EPA Awards $6M Remediation Contract to A and M Engineering for Washington County, MO

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,005,670 ($6.0M)

Contractor: A and M Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2023-07-28

End Date: 2025-06-18

Contract Duration: 691 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: WASHINGTON COUNTY, CONTRACT: 68HE0718D0005, SITE: WCLD (POTOSI, OLD MINES, FURNACE CREEK) RA OU01.

Place of Performance

Location: POTOSI, WASHINGTON County, MISSOURI, 63664

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $6.0 million to A AND M ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC for work described as: WASHINGTON COUNTY, CONTRACT: 68HE0718D0005, SITE: WCLD (POTOSI, OLD MINES, FURNACE CREEK) RA OU01. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for environmental remediation services at three sites in Washington County, MO. 2. A and M Engineering & Environmental Services, Inc. secured the $6.01M contract. 3. The contract falls under the Remediation Services NAICS code (562910). 4. This is a Firm Fixed Price contract, indicating a defined scope and cost. 5. The contract duration is approximately 23 months.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $6.01M for approximately 23 months of remediation services appears within a reasonable range for environmental cleanup projects of this nature. Benchmarking against similar EPA remediation contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This suggests that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of competition and impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for environmental cleanup, which is a necessary public service. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing the best value for taxpayers is a key consideration.

Public Impact

Improved environmental conditions at Potosi, Old Mines, and Furnace Creek sites. Potential for job creation related to remediation activities. Ensures compliance with environmental regulations. Addresses long-term environmental health concerns for the region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen environmental issues arise.
Contract duration may be insufficient for complex remediation.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical environmental remediation needs.
Utilizes a firm fixed-price contract to control costs.
Awarded to a company with relevant engineering and environmental services expertise.

Sector Analysis

Environmental remediation services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements and the need to address environmental hazards. Benchmarks vary widely based on project complexity and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that neither the prime contractor nor the award was specifically designated for small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the awarding and contracting agency, implying established oversight mechanisms. However, the 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method warrants scrutiny to ensure fairness and prevent potential impropriety.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
Lack of transparency regarding the exclusion criteria.
Potential for cost increases if unforeseen site conditions are encountered.
Contract duration may be tight for complex remediation projects.
No explicit small business participation noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $6.0 million to A AND M ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. WASHINGTON COUNTY, CONTRACT: 68HE0718D0005, SITE: WCLD (POTOSI, OLD MINES, FURNACE CREEK) RA OU01.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is A AND M ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-07-28. End: 2025-06-18.

What specific environmental hazards are being addressed at the WCLD sites, and how does the contract scope align with the remediation needs?

The contract is for Remediation Services (NAICS 562910) at the Washington County Lead District (WCLD) sites: Potosi, Old Mines, and Furnace Creek OU01. While the specific hazards are not detailed in the provided data, remediation services typically address contamination from hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. The contract's scope, valued at $6.01M over approximately 23 months, suggests a significant cleanup effort is planned, likely involving soil and/or groundwater remediation to meet regulatory standards.

What was the rationale for excluding certain sources during the full and open competition, and did this exclusion impact the final contract price?

The rationale for excluding sources during 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' is not provided. This procurement method suggests that a broader solicitation occurred, but specific vendors were deemed ineligible or unsuitable for reasons not detailed here. Without this information, it's impossible to definitively state the impact on price discovery. However, limiting the pool of potential bidders can sometimes lead to less competitive pricing compared to unrestricted full and open competition.

How will the effectiveness of the remediation efforts be measured and verified to ensure taxpayer value and environmental protection?

The effectiveness of remediation efforts will likely be measured through post-remediation sampling and analysis of soil, water, or air, compared against established cleanup standards set by the EPA or relevant state agencies. The contract's firm fixed-price nature incentivizes the contractor to complete the work efficiently. Oversight by the EPA, including site inspections and review of contractor reports, will be crucial for verifying that the remediation meets all technical and environmental objectives, ensuring accountability for taxpayer investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10010 E 16TH ST, TULSA, OK, 74128

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,005,670

Exercised Options: $6,005,670

Current Obligation: $6,005,670

Actual Outlays: $6,005,670

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0718D0005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline