EPA awards $3.15M for aerospace defense coatings remediation, with competition and oversight

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,150,000 ($3.1M)

Contractor: Kemron Environmental Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2022-06-17

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,566 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: EMERGENCY RESPONSE: AEROSPACE DEFENSE COATINGS, 7700 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD, MACON, BIBB CO, GA 31216; SITEID: C4N4

Place of Performance

Location: MACON, BIBB County, GEORGIA, 31216

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $3.1 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: EMERGENCY RESPONSE: AEROSPACE DEFENSE COATINGS, 7700 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD, MACON, BIBB CO, GA 31216; SITEID: C4N4 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of environmental remediation services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a focus on environmental cleanup and compliance. 4. Performance context involves long-term remediation efforts, requiring sustained oversight. 5. Sector positioning is within environmental services, a critical area for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.15 million for environmental remediation services, specifically for aerospace defense coatings, seems aligned with industry standards for such specialized cleanup. Benchmarking against similar EPA remediation contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials pricing structure allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to ensure costs remain controlled and justified.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, specific justifications were made for excluding certain sources. The presence of three bidders suggests a degree of competition, which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further examination to understand its impact on the final pricing and the range of potential bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple firms to bid, potentially driving down costs. The number of bidders provides some assurance that the government is receiving competitive offers.

Public Impact

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) benefits from this contract by ensuring the cleanup of hazardous materials. Services delivered include the remediation of aerospace defense coatings, addressing potential environmental contamination. The geographic impact is localized to Macon, Bibb County, Georgia, where the remediation site is located. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled environmental technicians and project managers for the duration of the contract.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to the Time and Materials pricing model.
Ensuring consistent quality of remediation work across the contract duration.
Managing the complexities of environmental regulations and compliance throughout the project.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, indicating potential for good value.
Contract duration allows for thorough and effective remediation.
Focus on a critical environmental cleanup task for the agency.

Sector Analysis

The environmental services sector is a significant part of government contracting, encompassing a wide range of activities from waste management to site remediation. This contract fits within the specialized niche of hazardous material cleanup, particularly related to industrial and defense-related activities. Comparable spending benchmarks in this sub-sector would typically focus on the complexity of the contaminants, the size of the affected area, and the duration of the remediation effort.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary focus remains on the prime contractor's capabilities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would include performance reviews, milestone tracking, and adherence to the contract's terms and conditions. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed operational reports may be internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Remediation Services
Hazardous Waste Management
Defense Contract Cleanup
Industrial Site Remediation

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns with Time and Materials contract type.
Complexity of environmental remediation requires diligent oversight.
Need to verify the impact of 'exclusion of sources' on competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $3.1 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.. EMERGENCY RESPONSE: AEROSPACE DEFENSE COATINGS, 7700 NE INDUSTRIAL BLVD, MACON, BIBB CO, GA 31216; SITEID: C4N4

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-06-17. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Kemron Environmental Services, Inc. with the federal government, particularly on similar remediation projects?

Kemron Environmental Services, Inc. has a history of federal contracting, though specific details on past performance for similar large-scale aerospace defense coatings remediation projects would require deeper database analysis. Their experience in environmental services is indicated by this award. A review of past performance evaluations, any past disputes, or contract terminations would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and capability. Examining their financial stability and capacity to handle projects of this magnitude is also crucial for assessing their track record. Without access to detailed past performance reports, it's difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the fact that they were selected for this contract.

How does the $3.15 million contract value compare to similar environmental remediation projects for aerospace defense coatings?

Benchmarking the $3.15 million contract value requires comparing it to similar projects in terms of scope, complexity, and geographic location. Environmental remediation projects, especially those involving specialized coatings and potential hazardous materials, can vary significantly in cost. Factors such as the extent of contamination, the specific types of coatings and underlying materials, the chosen remediation technologies, and regulatory requirements all influence pricing. A direct comparison would necessitate identifying contracts with analogous technical requirements and contract types (e.g., Time and Materials). Given the specialized nature, this value appears within a plausible range, but a definitive assessment of value-for-money requires more granular comparative data on similar remediation efforts.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential cost overruns due to the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, which can be less predictable than fixed-price contracts. Ensuring the quality and effectiveness of the remediation work over the contract's duration is another key risk. Environmental remediation projects also carry inherent risks related to unforeseen site conditions, changes in regulatory requirements, and potential environmental incidents during cleanup. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust project management, detailed work planning, regular progress monitoring, strict adherence to safety and environmental protocols, and clear communication channels between the contractor and the EPA. The EPA's oversight role is critical in managing these risks.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach in ensuring competitive pricing for the EPA?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' approach aims to balance broad competition with specific needs or justifications for excluding certain entities. While 'full and open' suggests a wide net was cast, the exclusion of sources implies that not all potential bidders were considered. This can potentially limit the number of competitive offers received, which might impact price discovery. However, if the exclusions were based on necessary qualifications or specific technical requirements that only a subset of firms could meet, it could still lead to a sufficiently competitive environment among qualified bidders. The fact that three bidders participated suggests a reasonable level of competition was achieved, but the precise impact on pricing compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition is difficult to ascertain without further analysis of the excluded sources and their potential bids.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental remediation services by the EPA, and how does this contract fit within it?

The EPA historically spends significant funds on environmental remediation services, addressing a wide array of contamination issues across the nation. This spending is driven by legislative mandates such as CERCLA (Superfund) and RCRA. Contracts for remediation services can range from small, localized cleanups to massive, long-term Superfund site operations. This $3.15 million contract for aerospace defense coatings remediation in Georgia appears to be a mid-sized project within the EPA's broader environmental cleanup portfolio. It aligns with the agency's ongoing mission to protect human health and the environment by addressing legacy contamination from industrial and defense activities. Understanding the historical spending trends for similar types of remediation (e.g., industrial coatings) would provide better context for this specific award's scale and significance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1359-A ELLSWORTH INDUSTRIAL BLVD, ATLANTA, GA, 30318

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,150,000

Exercised Options: $3,150,000

Current Obligation: $3,150,000

Actual Outlays: $2,579,357

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0421D0016

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline