EPA Awards $4.05M Task Order to Tetra Tech for Westside Lead RIFS

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,050,870 ($4.1M)

Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2021-09-15

End Date: 2026-07-14

Contract Duration: 1,763 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Environmental

Official Description: INITIATE SITE-SPECIFIC TASK ORDER (ASSESSMENT/INSPECTION ACTIVITIES) FOR WESTSIDE LEAD REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY (RIFS) UNDER START V CONTRACT 68HE0519D0006.

Place of Performance

Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30303

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $4.1 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: INITIATE SITE-SPECIFIC TASK ORDER (ASSESSMENT/INSPECTION ACTIVITIES) FOR WESTSIDE LEAD REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY (RIFS) UNDER START V CONTRACT 68HE0519D0006. Key points: 1. The task order focuses on critical environmental assessment and inspection activities for lead remediation. 2. Tetra Tech, Inc. is the awardee, suggesting established expertise in environmental consulting. 3. The contract is under the START V vehicle, indicating a potentially competitive procurement process. 4. The project addresses lead contamination, a significant public health and environmental concern.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The $4.05 million award for a 5-year task order appears reasonable for specialized environmental consulting services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale remedial investigation contracts would provide further validation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Awarded under full and open competition, this method likely fostered competitive pricing. The use of a Time and Materials contract type allows flexibility for the evolving needs of an assessment and inspection project.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for a critical environmental cleanup effort, aiming to mitigate long-term health and ecological risks.

Public Impact

Protects public health by addressing potential lead exposure risks. Contributes to environmental restoration and compliance with regulations. Supports the remediation of contaminated sites, improving community well-being. Ensures thorough investigation and feasibility studies for effective cleanup strategies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns with Time and Materials contract.
Long duration (5 years) may require ongoing oversight.
Complexity of lead remediation can lead to unforeseen challenges.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Addresses a significant environmental and public health issue.
Utilizes an established contract vehicle (START V).
Long-term engagement allows for comprehensive study.

Sector Analysis

Environmental consulting services are crucial for regulatory compliance and site remediation. Spending in this sector is driven by environmental regulations and the need to address legacy contamination, with benchmarks varying widely based on project scope and complexity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this award was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Larger prime contractors like Tetra Tech may subcontract portions of the work, potentially creating opportunities for small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is the awarding and contracting agency, suggesting robust oversight mechanisms are in place. The use of a task order under a larger contract vehicle also implies a degree of pre-qualification and oversight.

Related Government Programs

Environmental Consulting Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost creep due to Time and Materials contract.
Long contract duration requires sustained oversight.
Complexity of lead remediation can lead to scope changes.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in provided data.
No explicit small business participation noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $4.1 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. INITIATE SITE-SPECIFIC TASK ORDER (ASSESSMENT/INSPECTION ACTIVITIES) FOR WESTSIDE LEAD REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FEASIBILITY STUDY (RIFS) UNDER START V CONTRACT 68HE0519D0006.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-15. End: 2026-07-14.

What is the estimated total cost of the entire RIFS project, and how does this task order fit into the overall budget?

The provided data only details this specific task order valued at $4.05 million. Information regarding the total estimated cost for the entire Westside Lead Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RIFS) project is not available. This task order represents a significant portion, likely covering the initial assessment and inspection phases, but a comprehensive budget overview is needed to understand the full financial commitment and how this award aligns with it.

What are the specific performance metrics and deliverables for this task order, and how will Tetra Tech's performance be evaluated?

The data specifies 'assessment/inspection activities' for the RIFS. However, detailed performance metrics and specific deliverables are not provided. Effective oversight would require clear milestones, quality standards for reports and inspections, and a defined evaluation process by the EPA to ensure the work meets scientific and regulatory requirements for lead remediation.

How does the cost of this task order compare to similar environmental consulting contracts for lead remediation investigations of comparable scale and complexity?

While the $4.05 million award for a 5-year task order seems substantial, a direct cost comparison is difficult without more specific benchmarks for lead RIFS projects. Factors like site complexity, historical contamination levels, and regulatory requirements significantly influence costs. A detailed analysis of unit costs for specific activities (e.g., per sample analysis, per inspection hour) against industry standards would be necessary for a robust pricing assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1955 EVERGREEN BLVD STE 300, DULUTH, GA, 30096

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,050,870

Exercised Options: $4,050,870

Current Obligation: $4,050,870

Actual Outlays: $3,487,968

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $366,397

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0519D0006

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline