EPA Awards $9M+ for Lower Darby Creek Superfund Site Design Services to Tetra Tech

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,002,060 ($9.0M)

Contractor: Tetra Tech, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2021-09-29

End Date: 2027-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,192 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA (LDCA) SUPERFUND SITE (MULTIPLE OPERABLE UNITS (OUS) DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES (DES) THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO A VARIETY OF PLANNED ACTIVITIES RELATE

Place of Performance

Location: KING OF PRUSSIA, MONTGOMERY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19406

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $9.0 million to TETRA TECH, INC. for work described as: LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA (LDCA) SUPERFUND SITE (MULTIPLE OPERABLE UNITS (OUS) DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES (DES) THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO A VARIETY OF PLANNED ACTIVITIES RELATE Key points: 1. The contract focuses on design and engineering services for the Lower Darby Creek Superfund Site. 2. Tetra Tech, Inc. is the awardee under full and open competition. 3. The project spans nearly six years, indicating a long-term remediation effort. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for this environmental cleanup.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award amount of $9,005,059.58 for design and engineering services appears reasonable for a Superfund site remediation project of this duration. Benchmarking against similar EPA Superfund design contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for selecting the most qualified offeror. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is expected to yield a fair price for the taxpayer, ensuring funds are used efficiently for environmental remediation.

Public Impact

Public health and environmental safety are prioritized through the remediation of the Superfund site. Local communities in Pennsylvania will benefit from improved environmental conditions. Transparency in government spending is maintained through the competitive award process.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in long-term environmental projects.
Reliance on a single contractor for extensive design services.

Positive Signals

Clear contract duration and end date.
Firm fixed-price contract type for cost control.
Awarded under full and open competition.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the environmental consulting and remediation sector, a critical area for government spending focused on public health and ecological restoration. Spending in this sector is often driven by regulatory requirements and long-term cleanup initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this particular award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. The fixed-price nature of the award provides a degree of accountability for cost management, while the multi-year duration necessitates ongoing performance monitoring.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Environmental Protection Agency Contracting
Environmental Protection Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of cost overruns or scope changes.
Environmental remediation projects can be complex and face unforeseen challenges.
Potential for contractor performance issues over a multi-year engagement.
Dependence on specific regulatory approvals and timelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $9.0 million to TETRA TECH, INC.. LOWER DARBY CREEK AREA (LDCA) SUPERFUND SITE (MULTIPLE OPERABLE UNITS (OUS) DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES (DES) THE PURPOSE OF THIS TASK ORDER (TO) IS TO PROVIDE SUPPORT AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO A VARIETY OF PLANNED ACTIVITIES RELATE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TETRA TECH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-29. End: 2027-09-30.

What specific remediation technologies are being designed for the Lower Darby Creek Superfund Site under this contract?

The provided data focuses on the contract award details and does not specify the particular remediation technologies. Further documentation from the EPA or Tetra Tech would be required to identify the designed solutions for the Lower Darby Creek Superfund Site. This information is crucial for understanding the technical approach and potential effectiveness of the cleanup.

What are the key environmental risks associated with the Lower Darby Creek Superfund Site that necessitate this extensive design and engineering effort?

Superfund sites typically involve significant environmental risks such as soil and groundwater contamination from hazardous substances, posing threats to human health and ecosystems. The Lower Darby Creek site likely faces risks related to historical industrial activities or waste disposal, requiring comprehensive design services to address contamination pathways and implement effective cleanup strategies.

How will the effectiveness of the design and engineering services be measured to ensure successful remediation outcomes?

The effectiveness of design and engineering services is typically measured by adherence to project milestones, technical soundness of the designs, compliance with regulatory standards, and ultimately, the successful implementation and performance of the chosen remediation technologies. Post-remediation monitoring and validation studies confirm the long-term effectiveness of the cleanup, which is indirectly influenced by the quality of the initial design.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 68HE0321R0007

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 234 MALL BOULEVARD STE 260, KING OF PRUSSIA, PA, 19406

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,758,897

Exercised Options: $15,758,897

Current Obligation: $9,002,060

Actual Outlays: $3,914,973

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0318D0015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline