EPA awards $2M contract for environmental remediation at Stanley, NY site

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,000,000 ($2.0M)

Contractor: Kemron Environmental Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Environmental Protection Agency

Start Date: 2025-08-18

End Date: 2027-01-26

Contract Duration: 526 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONDUCT MITIGATION CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES AT THE ECO OPERATIONS SITE, IN STANLEY, NY UNDER SITE ID A2AZ, INCLUDING IMPLEMENTING MEASURES TO CONTAIN LEAKING MATERIAL, DEVELOPMENT OF A SAMPLING PLAN, SECURING THE SITE, PERFORMING BENCH SCALE TESTING AN

Place of Performance

Location: STANLEY, ONTARIO County, NEW YORK, 14561

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Environmental Protection Agency obligated $2.0 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: CONDUCT MITIGATION CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES AT THE ECO OPERATIONS SITE, IN STANLEY, NY UNDER SITE ID A2AZ, INCLUDING IMPLEMENTING MEASURES TO CONTAIN LEAKING MATERIAL, DEVELOPMENT OF A SAMPLING PLAN, SECURING THE SITE, PERFORMING BENCH SCALE TESTING AN Key points: 1. Contract focuses on containment, sampling, and site security for environmental hazards. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control challenges. 3. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate process. 4. The duration of over 500 days indicates a significant, long-term remediation effort. 5. Performance is expected in New York, impacting local environmental conditions and potentially workforce. 6. The contract is for remediation services, a critical environmental protection function.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $2 million for a period of approximately 2 years appears reasonable for environmental remediation services. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants close monitoring to ensure costs remain within projected limits. Benchmarking against similar remediation contracts would provide a clearer picture of value for money, as specific details on the scope of work and complexity are limited. The absence of a fixed price or ceiling could lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources may have been excluded for specific reasons, possibly related to qualifications or prior performance. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests an effort to solicit a wide range of qualified offerors, which generally promotes competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: This procurement method aims to ensure that taxpayers receive the best value by allowing all responsible sources to compete, while also allowing for specific exclusions if justified, potentially leading to a more efficient use of funds.

Public Impact

The local community in Stanley, NY, and surrounding areas will benefit from the containment and remediation of leaking materials. Services delivered include containment of hazardous substances, development of sampling plans, site security, and bench-scale testing. The geographic impact is localized to the ECO Operations Site in Stanley, NY. Potential workforce implications may arise from the need for specialized environmental remediation personnel.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type increases risk of cost overruns without strict oversight.
Exclusion of sources in a 'full and open' competition warrants understanding the justification to ensure fairness and optimal competition.
Limited public information on the specific environmental hazards and the full scope of remediation activities.

Positive Signals

Awarded by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), a key agency for environmental protection.
Contract duration of over 500 days suggests a comprehensive approach to remediation.
Focus on containment and development of sampling plans indicates a proactive and systematic approach to environmental management.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Environmental Remediation Services sector, a critical component of the broader environmental services industry. This sector involves cleaning up contaminated sites and managing hazardous materials. The market is driven by regulatory compliance, government contracts, and private sector environmental responsibility. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar EPA remediation projects would typically vary widely based on site complexity, contaminant type, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. Given the specialized nature of environmental remediation, it is possible that larger, more experienced firms are typically awarded such contracts. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the scope of this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracting officers and technical representatives. Accountability measures are inherent in the contract's performance requirements and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases, though detailed operational specifics may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Remedial Actions
RCRA Corrective Actions
Brownfields Program
Defense Environmental Remediation Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Need for clear justification for exclusion of sources in competition.
Environmental remediation projects can face unforeseen technical challenges.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Environmental Protection Agency awarded $2.0 million to KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.. CONDUCT MITIGATION CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES AT THE ECO OPERATIONS SITE, IN STANLEY, NY UNDER SITE ID A2AZ, INCLUDING IMPLEMENTING MEASURES TO CONTAIN LEAKING MATERIAL, DEVELOPMENT OF A SAMPLING PLAN, SECURING THE SITE, PERFORMING BENCH SCALE TESTING AN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KEMRON ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Environmental Protection Agency (Environmental Protection Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-18. End: 2027-01-26.

What is the specific nature of the leaking material and the environmental risks associated with the ECO Operations Site in Stanley, NY?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the leaking material or the precise environmental risks. However, the contract's objective to 'CONDUCT MITIGATION CONTRACTING ACTIVITIES...INCLUDING IMPLEMENTING MEASURES TO CONTAIN LEAKING MATERIAL' strongly suggests the presence of hazardous substances. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contracts of this nature typically address contaminants such as volatile organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals, petroleum products, or other industrial byproducts. The risks could range from groundwater contamination and soil pollution to potential air quality degradation and ecological damage. Further details would likely be found in the site's specific environmental assessment reports and the detailed statement of work for this contract.

How does the Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure compare to other contract types for similar environmental remediation projects?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts are often used when the scope of work is not clearly defined at the outset or is expected to change significantly. For environmental remediation, T&M can be suitable for initial site assessments or emergency response where the extent of contamination is unknown. However, compared to fixed-price contracts, T&M carries a higher risk of cost overruns for the government because the contractor is reimbursed for labor hours and material costs incurred. This necessitates robust oversight and detailed tracking of all expenditures. Other contract types like Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) offer greater cost certainty but require a well-defined scope. Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) is another option where the contractor is reimbursed for costs plus a fixed fee, providing some incentive for cost control.

What does 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' imply for the bidding process and potential cost savings?

This contract type signifies that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective contractors (full and open competition). However, specific sources were excluded from consideration. The reasons for exclusion are not detailed but could include factors like past performance issues, lack of specific certifications, or proprietary technology limitations. While aiming for broad competition, the exclusion of certain entities might limit the overall number of bidders. This could potentially impact the intensity of price competition compared to a scenario with no exclusions. The EPA would have had to justify these exclusions, likely to ensure the best technical solution or to mitigate specific risks, aiming to balance competitive breadth with specialized requirements.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental remediation services by the Environmental Protection Agency?

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) consistently allocates significant funding towards environmental remediation, particularly through programs like Superfund and RCRA. Historical spending data reveals a substantial and ongoing commitment to addressing contaminated sites across the United States. While specific annual figures fluctuate based on site needs, budget appropriations, and emergency responses, the EPA's remediation budget typically runs into billions of dollars over multi-year periods. This contract, valued at $2 million, represents a relatively small portion of the EPA's overall remediation expenditure but is indicative of the agency's continuous efforts to manage and mitigate environmental hazards at various operational sites.

What are the potential long-term implications of this contract for environmental cleanup efforts in New York?

This contract signifies a direct investment in addressing specific environmental contamination issues within New York State. Successful execution of the remediation activities at the Stanley, NY site could lead to improved local environmental quality, reduced risks to public health and ecosystems, and potentially enable the site for future beneficial reuse. Furthermore, the data and methodologies employed in this contract could inform future environmental management strategies within the state and for the EPA. It contributes to the broader goal of environmental restoration and compliance, aligning with state and federal environmental protection mandates.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1359-A ELLSWORTH INDUSTRIAL BLVD, ATLANTA, GA, 30318

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,000,000

Exercised Options: $2,000,000

Current Obligation: $2,000,000

Actual Outlays: $426,669

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 68HE0220D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline