Air Force's $23.4M training contract with Engility Corporation awarded under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,387,509 ($23.4M)
Contractor: Engility Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2010-09-26
End Date: 2011-09-25
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $64.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FFP ACADEMICS, INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING
Place of Performance
Location: HURLBURT FIELD, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32544
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.4 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: FFP ACADEMICS, INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING Key points: 1. Contract awarded for professional and management development training services. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests predictable costs for the government. 3. Awarded to a single vendor, Engility Corporation, indicating a focused procurement. 4. Contract duration of one year (364 days) allows for agile adjustments. 5. Geographic location of performance in Florida may indicate specific training facility needs. 6. The NAICS code 611430 points to a specialized training and education services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of approximately $23.4 million for a one-year training program appears reasonable given the scope of professional and management development. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the absence of detailed performance metrics makes a definitive value judgment challenging without further context on the quality and impact of the training delivered.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is generally expected to yield fair market prices and encourage innovation. The award to a single entity, Engility Corporation, implies they offered the best value proposition among the bidders. Further details on the number of bids received would clarify the intensity of the competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and ensuring the government receives competitive offers, maximizing the value of public funds.
Public Impact
Military personnel and civilian employees of the Department of the Air Force are the primary beneficiaries, receiving enhanced professional and management skills. The services delivered are crucial for leadership development and operational efficiency within the Air Force. Performance is located in Florida, potentially supporting local training infrastructure and personnel. The contract supports a workforce of instructors and administrative staff involved in delivering the training.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and impact of the training.
- Potential for vendor lock-in if similar training needs arise in the future without re-competition.
- Geographic concentration in Florida might limit broader access or create logistical challenges for personnel outside the region.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Specialized training services address critical development needs within the Air Force.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Professional and Management Development Training sector, a subset of the broader education and training services industry. This sector is characterized by specialized knowledge transfer and skill development. The market size for government training services is substantial, driven by the need for continuous upskilling and professionalization across various agencies. This specific contract represents a significant investment in human capital development for the Department of the Air Force.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (SB: false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without this data, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though larger prime contracts often have indirect benefits through supply chains.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified training services. Transparency is facilitated by contract award data, but detailed performance reporting and Inspector General involvement would depend on specific program requirements and any identified issues.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Training Programs
- Air Force Professional Development
- Management and Leadership Training Services
- Federal Education and Training Contracts
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Performance Location Specificity
- Lack of Detailed Performance Metrics
Tags
dod, air-force, training-services, professional-development, management-training, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, florida, naics-611430, contract-award, fiscal-year-2010
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.4 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. FFP ACADEMICS, INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-09-26. End: 2011-09-25.
What was the specific nature of the professional and management development training provided under this contract?
The contract data specifies 'ACADEMICS, INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING' under NAICS code 611430 (Professional and Management Development Training). While the exact curriculum is not detailed, this typically encompasses courses aimed at enhancing leadership skills, strategic thinking, project management, communication, and other competencies essential for effective management and professional growth within the Air Force. This could include anything from basic supervisory training to advanced executive leadership programs, tailored to the specific needs and ranks of the personnel being trained.
How does the $23.4 million contract value compare to similar Air Force training initiatives?
Benchmarking the $23.4 million value requires comparing it to contracts for similar scope, duration, and type of training within the Air Force or Department of Defense. Without access to a comprehensive database of comparable contracts, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a one-year duration, this value suggests a substantial program, likely serving a significant number of personnel or covering highly specialized, intensive training modules. The firm fixed-price nature implies cost certainty, which is a positive factor, but the ultimate value depends on the effectiveness and impact of the training delivered, which is not detailed in the provided data.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this training contract?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, for training contracts, KPIs might include trainee satisfaction scores, pre- and post-training knowledge assessments, observed behavioral changes in the workplace, or the achievement of specific learning objectives outlined in the Statement of Work. The absence of this information makes it challenging to quantitatively assess the effectiveness and return on investment of the training provided by Engility Corporation.
What is Engility Corporation's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in training services?
Engility Corporation (prior to its acquisition by SAIC) had a significant history of contracting with the Department of Defense across various service areas, including IT, engineering, and professional services. Their track record in training services would be reflected in past performance evaluations within their contract history. While this specific contract award is a data point, a comprehensive assessment would require reviewing multiple past performance reviews, contract modifications, and any documented issues or commendations related to their training delivery for the DoD.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award to Engility Corporation for this training requirement?
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' not sole-source. Therefore, the primary risk associated with a sole-source award does not apply here. The risks inherent in any large contract, such as potential cost overruns (mitigated by FFP), performance deficiencies, or vendor responsiveness issues, still exist. However, the competitive award process suggests that these risks were assessed and deemed acceptable based on Engility's proposal. The main risk moving forward would be ensuring the continued quality and relevance of the training provided.
How has federal spending on professional and management development training evolved over the years, and where does this contract fit?
Federal spending on professional and management development training is a consistent and significant expenditure across agencies, driven by the need to maintain a skilled civilian and military workforce. This contract, awarded in 2010 for approximately $23.4 million, represents a notable investment for the Air Force in that specific fiscal year. Analyzing historical spending trends would reveal fluctuations based on budget priorities, force structure changes, and evolving training methodologies. This contract fits within the broader category of human capital development, a critical component of overall defense readiness and operational effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Business Schools and Computer and Management Training › Professional and Management Development Training
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: FA489006R0179
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 3750 CENTERVIEW DR, CHANTILLY, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,387,509
Exercised Options: $23,387,509
Current Obligation: $23,387,509
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA489008D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-09-26
Current End Date: 2011-09-25
Potential End Date: 2011-09-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-11-18
More Contracts from Engility Corporation
- IT Support for Network Operation and Security Center for Usafcent — $150.8M (General Services Administration)
- [piin: W912cm-05-D-0011-0011] Migrated Award & Mods UP to 0005 — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !naval AIR Warfare Center Trainin!n6133900d0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 Communications Government !3750 Centerview Drive !chantilly !va!20151!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000039861464!n!n!000000000000!6930!operational Training Devices !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!2afx!f-18 Hornet !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!a!u!m!2!002!b! !Z!N!F! ! !n!b!y!n! ! !Z! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $91.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000084!5700!GV68 !esc/Ack !gs35f5396h !C!N! !N!F1962802F8162 !20020409!20040131!081080707!011147928!048341838!n!the Titan Corporation !1900 Campus Commons Drive !reston !va!20191!01375!037!24!andover Estates !ST. Mary S !maryland !+000011005449!n!n!000000000000!r499!other Professional Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $86.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)