SEC awards $1.15M contract for expert witness services to Kroll, LLC, with no competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $1,149,188 ($1.1M)
Contractor: Kroll, LLC
Awarding Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission
Start Date: 2025-09-10
End Date: 2030-09-04
Contract Duration: 1,820 days
Daily Burn Rate: $631/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10007
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Securities and Exchange Commission obligated $1.1 million to KROLL, LLC for work described as: EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about potential cost savings through competition. 2. The contract duration of five years suggests a long-term need for specialized expertise. 3. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting, a broad category. 4. The award to a single vendor may limit opportunities for emerging or specialized firms. 5. Performance will be monitored by the Securities and Exchange Commission's own agency. 6. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without comparable sole-source awards for expert witness services. However, the $1.15 million total value over five years, averaging $230,000 annually, appears reasonable for specialized expert witness testimony. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, carries inherent risks for cost control. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the SEC secured the best possible price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning the SEC did not solicit bids from multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific vendor possesses unique qualifications or capabilities essential for the requirement. The lack of competition means that price discovery through market forces was bypassed, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple firms had competed.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure to drive down costs. The SEC did not leverage the potential for cost savings that typically arises from a competitive bidding process.
Public Impact
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will benefit from access to specialized expert witness services. These services are crucial for supporting litigation and enforcement actions undertaken by the SEC. The services are delivered primarily in New York, where Kroll, LLC is based. The contract supports highly skilled professionals in the fields of financial analysis and forensic accounting.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potential cost savings for taxpayers.
- Time and Materials contract type poses a risk of cost escalation if not closely monitored.
- Lack of transparency in the justification for sole-source award.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized nature of services.
- Limited opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract.
Positive Signals
- Award to a reputable firm (Kroll, LLC) with established expertise in financial investigations.
- Long-term contract (5 years) provides stability and continuity for critical SEC functions.
- Services directly support the SEC's mission of enforcing securities laws.
- Clear performance period with a defined end date.
Sector Analysis
The market for expert witness services, particularly in financial and forensic accounting, is highly specialized. This contract falls within the professional services sector, supporting government regulatory functions. The SEC, as a major regulator, frequently requires such expertise for complex investigations and litigation. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the bespoke nature of expert witness engagements and the prevalence of sole-source awards in this niche.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Kroll, LLC, a large firm, suggests that the nature of the expert witness services required is beyond the typical scope or capacity of most small businesses in this specialized field. This limits direct opportunities for small businesses to engage with this specific contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be conducted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) itself, as the awarding agency. Accountability measures are inherent in the contract's performance clauses and reporting requirements. Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award would be crucial for public assessment. Inspector General jurisdiction would typically apply to investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- SEC Enforcement Division Support Services
- Financial Forensics Consulting
- Litigation Support Services
- Regulatory Compliance Consulting
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Time and Materials pricing
- Lack of competition
Tags
expert-witness-services, securities-and-exchange-commission, kroll-llc, administrative-management-and-general-management-consulting-services, definitive-contract, time-and-materials, not-competed, new-york, professional-services, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Securities and Exchange Commission awarded $1.1 million to KROLL, LLC. EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KROLL, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Securities and Exchange Commission (Securities and Exchange Commission).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $1.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-10. End: 2030-09-04.
What is Kroll, LLC's track record with the federal government, particularly the SEC?
Kroll, LLC has a significant history of contracting with various federal agencies, including the SEC. While specific details of past performance on similar expert witness contracts with the SEC are not publicly detailed in this award notice, Kroll is a well-established firm known for its expertise in financial forensics, investigations, and dispute resolution. Their extensive experience suggests a strong capability to fulfill the requirements of this contract. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would reveal the full scope and value of their prior federal engagements, including any performance ratings or past issues.
How does the $1.15 million value compare to similar expert witness contracts awarded by the SEC or other agencies?
Direct comparison of the $1.15 million value is difficult without knowing the specific scope and duration of services for other expert witness contracts. However, for a five-year engagement involving specialized financial expertise, this amount averages approximately $230,000 per year. This figure appears within a reasonable range for high-level expert testimony and forensic analysis, especially considering the complexity often involved in SEC enforcement actions. Sole-source awards, by their nature, lack direct competitive benchmarks, making precise value-for-money assessments challenging. However, the SEC likely considered Kroll's unique qualifications and market rates when determining this value.
What are the primary risks associated with this Time and Materials contract, and how are they mitigated?
The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or percentage. If the contractor's hours are not efficiently managed or if the scope of work expands unexpectedly, costs can escalate beyond initial estimates. Mitigation strategies typically include establishing strong contract management by the government, setting clear ceilings on total expenditure, requiring detailed progress reports, and conducting thorough reviews of invoices. The SEC's contract officers will need to actively monitor labor hours, rates, and the necessity of all expenditures to ensure cost control.
What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The justification for a sole-source award typically rests on the assertion that only one responsible source is capable of providing the required services. For specialized expert witness services, this often relates to unique expertise, proprietary methodologies, or established knowledge of a specific case or investigation that only a particular firm or individual possesses. In this instance, the SEC likely determined that Kroll, LLC holds specific, indispensable qualifications or institutional knowledge that cannot be readily replicated by other firms. This justification would need to be formally documented and approved according to federal acquisition regulations.
What is the historical spending pattern for expert witness services by the SEC?
Historical spending on expert witness services by the SEC is likely substantial and fluctuates based on the volume and complexity of enforcement actions. Agencies like the SEC frequently engage external experts for specialized knowledge in areas such as accounting, finance, economics, and digital forensics that may not be available in-house. While this specific $1.15 million contract represents a significant award, it should be viewed within the broader context of the SEC's overall budget and its consistent need for external expertise to support its regulatory and enforcement mandates. Analyzing past contract awards for similar services would provide a clearer picture of spending trends.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1 WORLD TRADE CTR FL 31, NEW YORK, NY, 10007
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,149,188
Exercised Options: $1,149,188
Current Obligation: $1,149,188
Actual Outlays: $232,106
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-10
Current End Date: 2030-09-04
Potential End Date: 2030-09-04 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-09
More Contracts from Kroll, LLC
- Document Management Solution (DMS) Integrator — $3.6M (Department of Justice)
Other Securities and Exchange Commission Contracts
- Infrastructure Support Services (ISS) Igf::ot::igf — $461.3M (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.)
- Information Systems Testing and Compliance Support Services — $185.5M (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- SEC Enterprise Edgar System Support Services — $159.5M (Maximus Federal Consulting, LLC)
- Reconstructed the Corrupted Fssp Conversion Document — $158.0M (Amentum Services, Inc.)
- FOR Other Functions Operations and Maintenance Support for Software Applications — $150.9M (Maximus Federal Consulting, LLC)