GIGA, INC. awarded $8,219 for pneumatic sanders, with 22 units procured under a GSA BPA Call

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,219 ($8.2K)

Contractor: Giga, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-04-18

Contract Duration: 8 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: SANDER, DISK, PNEUMATIC, PORTABLE: TYPE: MOTOR ONLY DRIVE TYPE: RIGHT ANGLE HANDLE TYPE: BODY GRIP THROTTLE TYPE: LEVEROPERATING AIR PRESSURE:90 PSI OPERATING AIR CONSUMPTION: 18 CFM AIR INLET: 1/4 INCH NPT NO LOAD SPEED: 10,000 RPM OVERALL LENGTH: 9

Place of Performance

Location: MACON, BIBB County, GEORGIA, 31216

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,219.34 to GIGA, INC. for work described as: SANDER, DISK, PNEUMATIC, PORTABLE: TYPE: MOTOR ONLY DRIVE TYPE: RIGHT ANGLE HANDLE TYPE: BODY GRIP THROTTLE TYPE: LEVEROPERATING AIR PRESSURE:90 PSI OPERATING AIR CONSUMPTION: 18 CFM AIR INLET: 1/4 INCH NPT NO LOAD SPEED: 10,000 RPM OVERALL LENGTH: 9 Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the fixed-price structure with economic price adjustments. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for these industrial supplies. 3. The contract duration of 8 days is short, indicating a tactical procurement. 4. Performance context is limited to a specific BPA Call, suggesting a smaller scope. 5. Sector positioning is within industrial supplies, a broad but essential category for government operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $8,219.34 for 22 units suggests a per-unit cost of approximately $373.61. This price point needs further benchmarking against similar pneumatic sander procurements to definitively assess value. However, the fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FPEPA) contract type offers some protection against significant cost overruns while allowing for market fluctuations.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $373.61 per unit (based on 22 units).

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 22 units procured through a BPA Call suggests that multiple vendors likely participated in the broader BPA, and this specific call likely saw competitive bidding among those BPA holders. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to better pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best prices to secure the contract.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring industrial supplies, specifically pneumatic tools, will benefit from this procurement. The services delivered include the provision of 22 portable pneumatic sanders. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as GSA procurements often serve various federal installations. Workforce implications include enabling maintenance and operational tasks for personnel using these tools.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the industrial supplies sector, specifically focusing on tools and equipment. The market for industrial supplies is vast, encompassing a wide range of products essential for government operations, manufacturing, and maintenance. Benchmarking this specific procurement against broader industrial supply contracts is challenging due to the specialized nature of the item (pneumatic sanders), but GSA's role suggests it aligns with established government purchasing channels for such goods.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this BPA Call (ss: false, sb: false). While GIGA, INC. is the prime contractor, there is no explicit information on subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this particular call. Further analysis of the overall BPA and GIGA, INC.'s subcontracting plan would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed through the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Federal Acquisition Service. As a BPA Call, it operates under the umbrella of a pre-existing Blanket Purchase Agreement, which itself is subject to GSA's procurement regulations and oversight. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, and accountability rests with GIGA, INC. to deliver the specified goods and GSA to ensure compliance.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

industrial-supplies, pneumatic-tools, gsa, federal-acquisition-service, bpa-call, fixed-price-with-economic-price-adjustment, full-and-open-competition, georgia, small-value-procurement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,219.34 to GIGA, INC.. SANDER, DISK, PNEUMATIC, PORTABLE: TYPE: MOTOR ONLY DRIVE TYPE: RIGHT ANGLE HANDLE TYPE: BODY GRIP THROTTLE TYPE: LEVEROPERATING AIR PRESSURE:90 PSI OPERATING AIR CONSUMPTION: 18 CFM AIR INLET: 1/4 INCH NPT NO LOAD SPEED: 10,000 RPM OVERALL LENGTH: 9

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GIGA, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,219.34.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-04-18.

What is the track record of GIGA, INC. as a federal contractor, particularly in supplying industrial equipment?

GIGA, INC. is listed as the contractor for this specific award. To assess their track record, a broader search of federal contract databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) would be necessary to identify other contracts awarded to GIGA, INC. This would reveal their history of performance, types of goods/services provided, agencies served, and any past performance issues or accolades. Without this broader search, their specific track record beyond this single BPA Call remains unknown. However, being awarded contracts, especially through competitive processes like full and open competition, suggests a baseline level of capability and compliance.

How does the per-unit cost of these pneumatic sanders compare to similar government or commercial purchases?

The per-unit cost for these pneumatic sanders is approximately $373.61 ($8,219.34 / 22 units). To benchmark this value, one would need to compare this price against recent federal procurements of similar pneumatic sanders (same or comparable brands, specifications, and quantities) and also against commercial retail prices. Factors like bulk discounts, delivery terms, and warranty can influence price. If this price is significantly higher than comparable commercial items or other federal contracts for similar tools, it could indicate a potential value concern. Conversely, if it aligns with or is lower than market rates, it suggests good value.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks for this contract are relatively low given its nature. One risk is potential price escalation due to the 'Economic Price Adjustment' clause, which allows for price changes based on market conditions. If the cost of raw materials or manufacturing increases significantly, the final price paid could be higher than initially anticipated. Another minor risk is delivery delays, although the short duration of the BPA Call (8 days) suggests an immediate need, making timely delivery crucial. Finally, ensuring the sanders meet the exact specifications and quality standards required by the end-user agency is a standard performance risk for any goods procurement.

How effective is the GSA's Federal Acquisition Service in ensuring competitive pricing for industrial supplies like these sanders?

The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) aims to ensure competitive pricing through various mechanisms, including establishing large-scale Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) with pre-vetted vendors and encouraging full and open competition for task orders under these BPAs. For this specific contract, the 'full and open competition' designation for the BPA Call is a positive indicator. However, the effectiveness can vary. While competition generally drives prices down, the specific market dynamics for niche industrial supplies, the number of active bidders on the BPA, and the negotiation power within each call all play a role. GSA's role is to provide the framework, but the actual price achieved depends on the specific competition realized for each order.

What is the historical spending pattern for pneumatic sanders or similar industrial tools by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending data for pneumatic sanders or similar industrial tools by the GSA would require a detailed analysis of past contract awards. GSA procures a vast array of industrial supplies through various mechanisms, including Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) and BPAs. To understand the pattern, one would look at the frequency of such procurements, the average contract values, the primary contractors, and the agencies utilizing these tools via GSA. This specific BPA Call for 22 units at $8,219.34 represents a relatively small transaction within GSA's overall spending. A trend analysis over several years would reveal if spending on such items is increasing, decreasing, or stable.

Are there any potential issues with the 'Economic Price Adjustment' clause in this fixed-price contract?

The 'Economic Price Adjustment' (EPA) clause in a fixed-price contract allows for modifications to the contract price based on fluctuations in specified economic factors, such as labor or material costs. For taxpayers, the primary concern with an EPA clause is the potential for increased costs if market prices rise significantly between the time of contract award and delivery. While it can protect contractors from unforeseen cost increases and ensure supply continuity, it introduces uncertainty in final expenditure. The specific index or formula used for adjustment, and the cap (if any) on adjustments, are critical details that determine the extent of this risk. Without knowing these specifics, it's difficult to quantify the exact risk, but it represents a deviation from a fully fixed price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale TradeMachinery, Equipment, and Supplies Merchant WholesalersIndustrial Supplies Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: HAND TOOLS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 22

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2448 INDUSTRIAL PARK DR, MACON, GA, 31216

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,219

Exercised Options: $8,219

Current Obligation: $8,219

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA21A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-10

Current End Date: 2026-04-18

Potential End Date: 2026-04-18 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-12

More Contracts from Giga, Inc.

View all Giga, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending