GSA awards $62,305 contract for 4x2 vans, highlighting fleet vehicle sourcing efficiency

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $62,305 ($62.3K)

Contractor: Fleet Vehicle Source Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-08-06

Contract Duration: 120 days

Daily Burn Rate: $519/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X2 VAN WAGON, COMPACT, 7 PASSENGER

Place of Performance

Location: LAS VEGAS, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89118

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $62,305 to FLEET VEHICLE SOURCE INC for work described as: 4X2 VAN WAGON, COMPACT, 7 PASSENGER Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure transfers risk to the contractor, promoting cost certainty. 3. Delivery order placed against an existing contract vehicle, indicating streamlined procurement. 4. The contract duration of 120 days is relatively short, suggesting immediate fleet needs. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336111 points to automobile manufacturing. 6. The contract is for compact, 7-passenger vans, indicating specific operational requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $62,305 for a 4x2 van appears reasonable, especially considering it's a delivery order against a potentially larger contract vehicle. Benchmarking against similar government fleet vehicle procurements would provide more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government secured a predictable cost for the specified vehicles.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 10 offers suggests a healthy level of competition for this vehicle procurement. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and achieving market-based pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this contract likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring compact, 7-passenger vans for operational duties will benefit from this contract. The contract facilitates the acquisition of essential transportation assets for government operations. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, as GSA serves various federal agencies across the US. The contract supports the automotive manufacturing sector and associated supply chains.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for long-term fleet needs not fully addressed by this short-duration delivery order.
Reliance on a single vehicle type may not meet diverse agency transportation requirements.

Positive Signals

Efficient procurement through an established contract vehicle (Fleet Vehicle Source Inc.).
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for this specific acquisition.
Full and open competition likely secured competitive pricing.
Delivery order mechanism suggests responsiveness to immediate agency needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader automotive manufacturing and fleet vehicle supply sector. The General Services Administration (GSA) plays a crucial role in consolidating federal purchasing power for common goods and services, including vehicles. The NAICS code 336111 specifically relates to the manufacturing of automobiles, indicating the origin of these vehicles. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other GSA fleet vehicle procurements and agency-specific vehicle acquisition data.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While Fleet Vehicle Source Inc. is the awardee, further investigation would be needed to determine if they are a small business or if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within the automotive supply chain. The absence of a small business set-aside suggests the competition was open to all eligible offerors.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) oversees this contract through its Federal Acquisition Service. Oversight mechanisms likely include contract performance monitoring, adherence to delivery schedules, and quality assurance. Accountability is ensured through the firm-fixed-price contract terms and GSA's procurement regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases like FPDS.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Procurement
Federal Vehicle Acquisition Programs
Automotive Manufacturing Contracts
General Services Administration Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for price escalation if contract terms are not sufficiently robust.
Dependence on contractor's supply chain for timely delivery.
Need for detailed performance metrics to ensure vehicle quality.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $62,305 to FLEET VEHICLE SOURCE INC. 4X2 VAN WAGON, COMPACT, 7 PASSENGER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FLEET VEHICLE SOURCE INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $62,305.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-08-06.

What is the track record of Fleet Vehicle Source Inc. in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for vehicles?

Fleet Vehicle Source Inc. has been awarded federal contracts, as indicated by this delivery order. To assess their track record, a deeper dive into their past performance on similar contracts with GSA or other agencies would be necessary. This would involve reviewing contract completion history, any reported performance issues or awards, and customer satisfaction feedback if publicly available. Analyzing the number and value of previous contracts awarded to them can provide insight into their experience and capacity to handle government procurements. Without specific historical data on Fleet Vehicle Source Inc.'s performance, it is difficult to definitively assess their track record beyond their current award.

How does the $62,305 award for these vans compare to similar government fleet vehicle procurements?

The award of $62,305 for a 4x2 van, described as compact and 7-passenger, needs to be benchmarked against comparable government fleet vehicle procurements. Factors such as make, model, specific features, and volume significantly influence vehicle costs. If this is for a single unit or a small batch, the price might be within market expectations for a government purchase, which often includes specific compliance requirements. However, if this represents a larger quantity, the per-unit cost would be a critical metric. Comparing this to recent GSA schedule awards or other agency solicitations for similar vehicles would reveal if the pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government aimed for cost certainty, but the true value is determined by comparing the price to the prevailing market rates for equivalent vehicles purchased by other entities.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential delays in delivery, issues with vehicle quality or specifications not meeting requirements, and price fluctuations if the firm-fixed-price was set too low by the contractor. Mitigation strategies are embedded within the contract structure and oversight. The firm-fixed-price transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor. The relatively short duration (120 days) and the fact it's a delivery order against an existing contract vehicle suggest a streamlined process with potentially pre-vetted terms. GSA's oversight and the contractor's reputation (if positive) also serve as risk mitigators. However, specific risks related to the make/model of the van or the contractor's supply chain capacity would require more detailed information.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for money for this specific vehicle procurement?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally effective in ensuring value for money for vehicle procurements like this one. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages contractors to offer their best terms. The fact that 10 offers were received indicates a robust competition, which is a strong indicator that the government is likely to receive competitive pricing. This method allows the government to leverage market forces to its advantage, ensuring that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently. While the specific value is contingent on the final negotiated price and the quality of the vehicles received, the competitive process itself is a key mechanism for achieving good value.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar compact, 7-passenger vans by the General Services Administration?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar compact, 7-passenger vans by the GSA would provide crucial context for this $62,305 award. This would involve examining past contract awards for vehicles with comparable specifications (e.g., 4x2, 7-passenger capacity, compact size) over several fiscal years. Key metrics to review would include the average price per vehicle, the number of bids received on previous solicitations, the duration of those contracts, and the primary awardees. Understanding these patterns can reveal trends in pricing, identify fluctuations in demand, and highlight any shifts in the competitive landscape. Such analysis would help determine if the current award represents a fair market price and if spending in this category has been consistent or variable.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA21R0008

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6718 W SUNSET RD, LAS VEGAS, NV, 89118

Business Categories: American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $62,305

Exercised Options: $62,305

Current Obligation: $62,305

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA22D000U

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline