General Motors awarded $71,088 contract for 4x4 SUVs by GSA, highlighting fleet acquisition needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $71,088 ($71.1K)

Contractor: General Motors LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-07-05

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $790/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X4 SUV, FULL SIZE, 4 DR, 8 PASS, MIN 7000 LBS GVWR

Place of Performance

Location: DETROIT, WAYNE County, MICHIGAN, 48243

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $71,088 to GENERAL MOTORS LLC for work described as: 4X4 SUV, FULL SIZE, 4 DR, 8 PASS, MIN 7000 LBS GVWR Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates price certainty for the government. 3. Delivery order issued against an existing contract, implying a streamlined acquisition process. 4. The vehicle specification points to a need for robust, high-capacity utility vehicles. 5. The short duration of the order (90 days) suggests a specific, immediate requirement. 6. Award to a major manufacturer indicates reliance on established automotive supply chains.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $71,088 for a single 4x4 SUV appears within a reasonable range for a full-size, heavy-duty vehicle with specific government requirements. Benchmarking against similar government fleet purchases or commercial sales of comparable models would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the absence of detailed specifications for options or packages makes a definitive value-for-money judgment challenging without further context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 10 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process like this typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices and encouraging offerors to provide their best value propositions.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring robust utility vehicles for operational needs will benefit from this acquisition. The contract supports the operational readiness of government personnel who require specialized vehicles. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, where the vehicles will be delivered and utilized. The acquisition supports jobs within the automotive manufacturing sector, specifically at General Motors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for higher-than-market price if specific options are not competitively bid.
Dependence on a single manufacturer could limit future flexibility in fleet composition.

Positive Signals

Award through full and open competition suggests a fair and competitive process.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Delivery order mechanism indicates efficient use of existing contract vehicles.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader automotive manufacturing and government fleet acquisition sector. The market for government vehicles is substantial, with agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) playing a key role in procurement. Spending in this area is driven by the need for operational vehicles across various federal agencies, ranging from law enforcement to logistical support. Benchmarks for similar vehicle acquisitions by GSA or other agencies would provide further context on the pricing and competition dynamics.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, General Motors. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether General Motors utilizes small business subcontractors for parts or services related to this specific vehicle production, which is not detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which is responsible for managing federal procurement. Accountability is ensured through the firm-fixed-price contract terms and the delivery order process. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for review of basic award details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Purchasing
Federal Vehicle Acquisition
General Services Administration Contracts
Automotive Manufacturing Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for price escalation not fully captured in fixed price.
Delivery timeline risk for critical operational needs.
Sole-source dependency if future needs are highly specific.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $71,088 to GENERAL MOTORS LLC. 4X4 SUV, FULL SIZE, 4 DR, 8 PASS, MIN 7000 LBS GVWR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL MOTORS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $71,088.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-07-05.

What is the track record of General Motors LLC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for vehicle acquisitions?

General Motors LLC has a long and extensive history of fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for vehicle acquisitions through agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) and the Department of Defense. They are a primary supplier of a wide range of vehicles to the U.S. government, from sedans and SUVs to trucks and specialized vehicles. Their track record generally indicates a capacity to meet large-scale government demands, though like any large contractor, specific contract performance can vary. Historical data often shows consistent awards to GM due to their manufacturing capabilities, product offerings, and established procurement relationships. Analyzing past performance ratings and any documented issues on similar contracts would provide a more granular view of their reliability for specific vehicle types and delivery schedules.

How does the awarded price of $71,088 for this 4x4 SUV compare to similar government or commercial purchases?

The awarded price of $71,088 for a full-size, 4-door, 8-passenger 4x4 SUV with a minimum 7000 lbs GVWR is a key data point for value assessment. Without specific trim levels, optional equipment, or detailed government-mandated modifications, direct comparison is challenging. However, for a heavy-duty, full-size SUV, this price point is within the expected range for government fleet acquisitions, which often include specific configurations or durability requirements. Commercial equivalents in the full-size SUV market can range significantly, but vehicles with similar towing capacities and passenger configurations often retail in a similar or higher bracket, especially when considering fleet discounts or specialized government packages. A more precise benchmark would involve comparing this award to other GSA schedule awards or competitively bid contracts for identical or highly similar vehicle specifications issued around the same time.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential price volatility if the firm-fixed-price does not adequately account for unforeseen manufacturing or supply chain cost increases, although this is mitigated by the contract type. Another risk is delivery timeline adherence, especially given the short order duration, which could impact agency operations if delays occur. Dependence on a single manufacturer, General Motors, for this specific vehicle type could pose a risk if future needs arise that are better met by other manufacturers or if GM faces production disruptions. Furthermore, the risk of the vehicle not perfectly meeting all nuanced operational requirements, despite the detailed specifications, exists, potentially leading to user dissatisfaction or the need for costly modifications post-delivery.

How effective is the Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) in managing vehicle procurements like this one?

The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) within the GSA is generally considered effective in managing vehicle procurements, leveraging its expertise and established contract vehicles to achieve economies of scale and streamline the acquisition process for federal agencies. The issuance of a delivery order against an existing contract, as seen here, is a testament to the efficiency of this model. FAS aims to provide agencies with reliable access to vehicles at competitive prices through pre-negotiated contracts and competitive processes. However, effectiveness can be measured by various factors, including the timeliness of delivery, the overall cost savings achieved compared to agency-direct procurement, and user satisfaction. Continuous evaluation of contract vehicles, competition levels, and pricing trends is crucial for maintaining and enhancing FAS's effectiveness in this domain.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar 4x4 SUVs by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending patterns for similar 4x4 SUVs by the General Services Administration (GSA) typically show consistent procurement to support various federal agency needs. GSA often utilizes large-scale contracts, including those with major manufacturers like General Motors, to acquire these vehicles. Spending fluctuates based on overall federal fleet requirements, agency budget allocations, and the lifecycle replacement schedules for existing vehicles. The GSA's Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) and other competitive contract vehicles are primary mechanisms for these purchases. Analyzing past awards for similar vehicle classes (e.g., full-size SUVs, light trucks) over several fiscal years would reveal trends in volume, average pricing, and the dominant manufacturers, providing context for the current $71,088 award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA21R0008

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Motors Company

Address: 30400 VAN DYKE AVE, WARREN, MI, 48093

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $71,088

Exercised Options: $71,088

Current Obligation: $71,088

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA22D000Q

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline