General Motors awarded $71,088 contract for 4x4 SUVs by GSA, highlighting fleet acquisition needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $71,088 ($71.1K)

Contractor: General Motors LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-07-05

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $790/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X4 SUV, FULL SIZE, 4 DR, 8 PASS, MIN 7000 LBS GVWR

Place of Performance

Location: DETROIT, WAYNE County, MICHIGAN, 48243

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $71,088 to GENERAL MOTORS LLC for work described as: 4X4 SUV, FULL SIZE, 4 DR, 8 PASS, MIN 7000 LBS GVWR Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 3. Delivery order issued against an existing contract, indicating potential for streamlined procurement. 4. The vehicle specification points to a need for robust, high-capacity utility vehicles. 5. The short duration of the delivery order suggests a specific, immediate requirement. 6. The awardee, General Motors, is a major automotive manufacturer with extensive government contracting experience.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $71,088 for a single 4x4 SUV appears within a reasonable range for a full-size, heavy-duty vehicle. Benchmarking against similar government fleet purchases or commercial sales of comparable models would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overruns for this specific acquisition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 10 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this requirement, which typically leads to better pricing and value for the government. The specific number of bidders provides a good indication of market interest.

Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition for this vehicle acquisition likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring robust, multi-passenger utility vehicles for operational needs will benefit from this contract. The contract facilitates the acquisition of essential transportation assets for government fleet operations. The vehicles are likely to be utilized across various government functions, potentially including law enforcement, logistics, or field operations. The procurement supports the automotive manufacturing sector and associated supply chains.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for future contract modifications or extensions that could increase overall spending.
Dependence on a single manufacturer for specific vehicle types could limit future flexibility.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Delivery order against an existing contract suggests efficient procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

The automotive manufacturing sector is a significant industry, with government fleet procurement representing a consistent, albeit small, portion of overall sales. This contract falls within the broader category of vehicle manufacturing and supply, supporting the production and distribution of specialized vehicles. Benchmarking against other government vehicle procurements would reveal trends in pricing and demand for similar utility vehicles.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (SS=false, SB=false). While General Motors is a large business, the procurement process itself could potentially involve small business subcontractors in the manufacturing or supply chain. However, without specific subcontracting plans detailed in the award, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not immediately apparent from this data alone.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms. As a delivery order against a larger contract, it likely falls under existing GSA oversight for contract performance and compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases, and any issues would be subject to GSA's administrative and potentially Inspector General review.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Purchasing
Federal Vehicle Acquisition Programs
Department of Defense Vehicle Procurement
Law Enforcement Vehicle Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions affecting delivery timelines.
Ensuring vehicle meets all specialized operational requirements upon delivery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $71,088 to GENERAL MOTORS LLC. 4X4 SUV, FULL SIZE, 4 DR, 8 PASS, MIN 7000 LBS GVWR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL MOTORS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $71,088.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-07-05.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar 4x4 SUVs by the General Services Administration?

Analyzing historical GSA spending on 4x4 SUVs requires accessing detailed procurement data over several fiscal years. Typically, GSA procures vehicles through various contract vehicles, including indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts and specific delivery orders. Spending patterns can fluctuate based on agency needs, budget allocations, and the availability of competitive pricing. For instance, if GSA has consistently awarded similar vehicles to multiple manufacturers over the years, it suggests a stable demand and competitive market. Conversely, a significant increase or decrease in spending on such vehicles might indicate shifts in federal fleet modernization efforts or changes in operational requirements. Without specific historical data for this exact vehicle type and configuration, it's difficult to provide precise figures, but GSA's role as a central procurement agency implies a continuous, albeit variable, demand for fleet vehicles.

How does the awarded price compare to commercial market prices for similar vehicles?

Comparing the awarded price of $71,088 for a 4x4 SUV to commercial market prices requires identifying the exact model and trim level offered by General Motors. Full-size, 4-door, 8-passenger SUVs with a minimum 7000 lbs GVWR are typically high-end models. Commercial pricing for such vehicles, especially when equipped with specific packages for government use (e.g., heavy-duty alternators, specific communication pre-wiring), can vary significantly. Government contracts often include negotiated discounts or fleet pricing that may differ from retail sticker prices. However, a direct comparison to MSRP or dealer pricing for a similarly equipped civilian model would be necessary. If the awarded price is substantially lower than commercial equivalents, it suggests effective price negotiation or competitive bidding. If it's higher, it might indicate specialized government requirements or less competitive pricing for this specific configuration.

What are the potential risks associated with this specific contract award?

Potential risks associated with this contract include delivery delays if General Motors faces production or supply chain issues, which are common in the automotive industry. Another risk is the possibility of the vehicle not meeting all specific operational requirements once deployed, leading to potential modification costs or dissatisfaction. Given it's a firm-fixed-price contract, any cost overruns due to unforeseen manufacturing challenges would be borne by the contractor, but this could incentivize cutting corners on quality if not properly monitored. Furthermore, if this vehicle becomes a critical part of a specific agency's operations, any disruption in its availability or performance could impact mission readiness. The short delivery window also presents a risk if unforeseen circumstances prevent timely delivery.

What is the track record of General Motors in fulfilling federal vehicle contracts?

General Motors has a long and extensive track record of fulfilling federal vehicle contracts across various agencies and branches of the U.S. government. As one of the largest automotive manufacturers globally, GM regularly competes for and wins contracts for a wide array of vehicles, from sedans and light trucks to specialized law enforcement and military vehicles. Their participation in GSA schedules and direct solicitations is common. Historically, GM has demonstrated the capacity to deliver large volumes of vehicles and meet stringent government specifications. While specific performance metrics for every contract are not publicly detailed, their continued presence as a major federal supplier indicates a generally reliable performance history. However, like any large contractor, there can be instances of contract disputes, delivery challenges, or performance issues on specific awards, which are typically managed through contract administration processes.

How does the number of bidders (10) influence the value for taxpayers?

A higher number of bidders, such as the 10 received for this contract, generally signifies robust competition. This increased competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie to win the award by offering more favorable terms and pricing. For taxpayers, this means a greater likelihood of obtaining the required vehicles at a cost that reflects market value, rather than a price potentially inflated by limited supplier options. The presence of multiple bidders also suggests that the government's requirements were clearly defined and accessible to a broad range of potential suppliers, fostering a more efficient and cost-effective procurement process. This scenario is ideal for ensuring that taxpayer funds are used judiciously.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA21R0008

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Motors Company

Address: 30400 VAN DYKE AVE, WARREN, MI, 48093

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $71,088

Exercised Options: $71,088

Current Obligation: $71,088

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA22D000Q

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline