GSA's $3M TIERED INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE (TIM) IV contract awarded to M. C. Dean, Inc. for engineering services in Utah

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,056,859 ($3.1M)

Contractor: M. C. Dean, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-06-15

End Date: 2026-11-14

Contract Duration: 517 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TIERED INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE (TIM) IV OGDEN

Place of Performance

Location: HILL AFB, DAVIS County, UTAH, 84056

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.1 million to M. C. DEAN, INC. for work described as: TIERED INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE (TIM) IV OGDEN Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a multi-year engineering services BPA call. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The contract duration of 517 days is standard for this type of service. 5. Engineering services are critical for maintaining federal infrastructure. 6. The contract is a BPA call, indicating it's part of a larger framework agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3.06 million for a period of 517 days (roughly 17 months) for engineering services appears to be within a reasonable range for a task order under a larger Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). Without specific details on the scope of work, direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the government has negotiated a set price, which is generally favorable for cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. With 4 bidders, this suggests a healthy level of competition for this specific task order. The presence of multiple bidders generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces to secure competitive pricing for essential engineering services.

Public Impact

Federal facilities in Utah will benefit from enhanced infrastructure maintenance and engineering support. Services delivered will likely include design, assessment, and potentially oversight of infrastructure projects. The geographic impact is primarily focused on Utah, where the General Services Administration (GSA) operates facilities. The contract supports the engineering sector workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs for skilled professionals.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the initial requirements are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant duration could pose risks if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type limits the government's exposure to cost increases.
Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process.
The contract is a BPA call, implying it aligns with a pre-negotiated, potentially advantageous master agreement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector supports the design, development, and maintenance of physical infrastructure across various domains. The market for engineering services supporting federal agencies is substantial, with significant spending allocated annually for facility management, upgrades, and new construction. This BPA call likely represents a portion of GSA's ongoing efforts to ensure the operational integrity and longevity of its managed properties.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of small business subcontracting requirements. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless M. C. Dean, Inc. voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further review of the BPA master agreement and the specific task order would be needed to confirm any subcontracting plans or goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Facility Management Contracts
Tiered Infrastructure Maintenance (TIM) Program
Federal Engineering Services Contracts
Public Buildings Service (PBS) Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for undefined scope impacting cost and schedule.
Reliance on contractor performance for critical infrastructure maintenance.
Need for clear deliverables and acceptance criteria.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.1 million to M. C. DEAN, INC.. TIERED INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE (TIM) IV OGDEN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M. C. DEAN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-15. End: 2026-11-14.

What is the specific scope of engineering services covered under this TIM IV BPA call?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'TIERED INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE (TIM) IV OGDEN' and falls under 'Engineering Services' (NAICS 541330). However, the precise details of the services are not specified. Typically, such contracts could encompass a range of activities including condition assessments, design services for repairs or upgrades, preventative maintenance planning, energy efficiency studies, and potentially construction oversight for infrastructure projects within GSA-managed facilities in the Ogden, Utah region. The 'Tiered' aspect suggests a structured approach to maintenance, possibly prioritizing critical systems or different levels of service based on need and funding.

How does the awarded amount of $3.06 million compare to similar engineering services contracts managed by GSA in Utah?

Benchmarking this $3.06 million contract value against similar GSA engineering services contracts in Utah requires access to a broader dataset of historical awards. However, for a contract duration of approximately 17 months (517 days), this amount suggests a moderate-sized task order. GSA manages a vast portfolio of facilities, and the scale of engineering support can vary significantly. Factors such as the complexity of the infrastructure, the specific services required (e.g., design vs. ongoing maintenance planning), and the number of facilities covered would influence the contract value. Without more granular data on comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate M. C. Dean, Inc.'s performance under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or evaluation metrics for this contract. However, for engineering services contracts, common KPIs often include adherence to project schedules, quality of deliverables (e.g., accuracy of designs, thoroughness of assessments), compliance with relevant codes and standards, cost control (especially if there are time and materials components or change orders), and client satisfaction. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests that meeting the defined scope within the agreed budget is a primary performance expectation. GSA likely has standard performance management processes that would be applied.

What is the historical spending pattern for Tiered Infrastructure Maintenance (TIM) contracts by GSA, and how does this award fit in?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for GSA's Tiered Infrastructure Maintenance (TIM) contracts. TIM IV suggests this is a continuation or iteration of a program. To understand the historical context, one would need to analyze previous TIM solicitations and awards (TIM I, II, III) and potentially other GSA infrastructure maintenance vehicles. This $3.06 million award represents a single task order under the TIM IV BPA. The overall spending on TIM would depend on the number of active BPAs, the number of task orders issued against them, and their individual values. This specific award appears to be a component of a larger, ongoing GSA strategy for infrastructure upkeep.

Are there any specific risks associated with M. C. Dean, Inc. as a contractor for this type of service, based on their track record?

The provided data does not include information on M. C. Dean, Inc.'s specific track record or any associated risks. A comprehensive risk assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), any past disputes or litigation, and their financial stability. M. C. Dean, Inc. is a large, established government contractor, often involved in complex electrical, mechanical, and systems engineering projects. While their size might suggest capability, it also means potential for larger-scale issues if performance falters. Without specific CPARS data or other performance history, it's impossible to identify contractor-specific risks beyond general contract management concerns.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFRA25Q0003

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1765 GREENSBORO STATION PL, TYSONS, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,646,857

Exercised Options: $3,619,442

Current Obligation: $3,056,859

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $38,962

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFRA25A0002

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline