DISA TIM III Enterprise contract awarded to M. C. Dean, Inc. for $6.19M, spanning over 5 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,193,380 ($6.2M)

Contractor: M. C. Dean, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-02-15

End Date: 2025-07-14

Contract Duration: 1,976 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DISA TIM III ENTERPRISE

Place of Performance

Location: GREENWOOD VILLAGE, ARAPAHOE County, COLORADO, 80111

State: Colorado Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $6.2 million to M. C. DEAN, INC. for work described as: DISA TIM III ENTERPRISE Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the 5-year duration and firm-fixed-price structure. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with a firm-fixed-price contract type generally transferring risk to the contractor. 4. Performance context is within facilities support services, a critical but often standardized area. 5. Sector positioning is within the IT and Facilities Support Services domain, supporting defense operations. 6. The contract's value is relatively modest for a multi-year federal award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $6.19 million over approximately 5 years suggests an average annual value of around $1.24 million. Without specific deliverables or service level agreements, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure implies that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for value if performance is met. The General Services Administration (GSA) often facilitates competitive pricing, but the specific market rates for these facilities support services would require further benchmarking.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The data shows 2 bids were received. A full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and innovation. The limited number of bids (2) might suggest specific requirements or a niche market, but the process itself is designed to maximize competition.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining services at competitive market prices, preventing potential overpayment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), receiving essential facilities support services. Services delivered include facility maintenance and support, crucial for the operational readiness of DISA. The geographic impact is centered in Colorado, where the services are likely performed. Workforce implications may include direct and indirect employment opportunities within the facilities support sector in Colorado.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited number of bids (2) could indicate potential barriers to entry or a concentrated market.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to fully assess value for money.
The contract duration of nearly 5 years requires ongoing monitoring to ensure continued alignment with agency needs.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type transfers cost risk to the contractor.
Contract is managed by the General Services Administration, a reputable agency for federal procurement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government facilities. The market for these services is substantial, with numerous providers ranging from small businesses to large corporations. The contract's value of $6.19 million over five years is moderate within the context of federal facilities management, which can involve much larger, multi-billion dollar programs. This specific award supports critical IT infrastructure operations for DISA.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses mandated by a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, M. C. Dean, Inc., may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their overall business strategy or to meet broader federal subcontracting goals, though this is not explicitly detailed in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the General Services Administration (GSA) or the serviced agency (DISA). Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG, where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

DISA Operations and Maintenance Contracts
GSA Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
Facilities Management Services
IT Infrastructure Support Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition (2 bidders)
Contract duration nearing completion

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $6.2 million to M. C. DEAN, INC.. DISA TIM III ENTERPRISE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M. C. DEAN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-02-15. End: 2025-07-14.

What is the track record of M. C. Dean, Inc. with federal contracts, particularly in facilities support?

M. C. Dean, Inc. is a significant federal contractor with a long history of performance across various agencies, including the Department of Defense and civilian departments. Their portfolio often includes complex facilities management, engineering, and technical services. While specific performance ratings for this particular contract (DISA TIM III) are not detailed here, their general track record suggests substantial experience. Federal procurement data (like FPDS-NG) would provide a more granular view of their past performance, including past performance evaluations, contract modifications, and any disputes or terminations. A review of these records would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and reliability for this specific requirement.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services?

Benchmarking the price of $6.19 million over approximately five years requires detailed knowledge of the specific services rendered under the DISA TIM III contract. Facilities support services can range widely in scope, from basic janitorial work to complex building systems maintenance and IT infrastructure support. Without a precise breakdown of the services and their associated labor categories and quantities, a direct comparison to market rates is difficult. However, given that the contract was awarded under full and open competition by GSA, it suggests that the pricing was deemed competitive at the time of award. Further analysis would involve comparing the contract's unit rates (if available) against industry benchmarks for similar government or commercial contracts in the Colorado region.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor (M. C. Dean, Inc.), cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price structure is not adequately managed, and potential changes in DISA's requirements over the contract's five-year duration. Performance risk is mitigated through the firm-fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and deliver services efficiently. Oversight by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and adherence to Service Level Agreements (SLAs) are crucial for monitoring performance. Changes in requirements are typically handled through contract modifications, which would be subject to negotiation and approval. The limited number of bidders (2) could also represent a risk if the contractor faces financial difficulties or decides to exit the market, potentially limiting options for future support.

How effective has this contract been in supporting DISA's mission objectives?

Assessing the effectiveness of this contract in supporting DISA's mission requires access to performance metrics, user feedback, and DISA's internal assessments, which are not provided in the summary data. However, the contract's purpose is to provide essential facilities support services, which are foundational to the reliable operation of DISA's IT infrastructure and overall mission. If M. C. Dean, Inc. has met the contract's requirements and SLAs, then the contract is contributing positively by ensuring a stable operational environment. Conversely, any performance issues would directly impact DISA's ability to execute its mission. Continued monitoring and evaluation by DISA and GSA are necessary to ensure ongoing effectiveness.

What are the historical spending patterns for facilities support services at DISA or similar agencies?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support services at DISA and similar defense agencies typically show significant and consistent investment due to the critical nature of their operations. Agencies like DISA require robust, secure, and continuously operational facilities to house sensitive IT systems and data centers. Spending in this category often fluctuates based on infrastructure upgrades, modernization efforts, and the overall defense budget. Contracts can range from small, localized maintenance agreements to large, enterprise-wide support solutions. The $6.19 million awarded here represents a specific component of DISA's broader facilities management budget, which likely encompasses numerous other contracts for various services and locations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID08200001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1765 GREENSBORO STATION PL, TYSONS, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,263,325

Exercised Options: $6,870,041

Current Obligation: $6,193,380

Actual Outlays: $-697

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 10

Total Subaward Amount: $535,506

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA18D0011

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline