GSA awards $11.3M facilities support contract to M.C. Dean, Inc. for Oklahoma City operations

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,295,897 ($11.3M)

Contractor: M. C. Dean, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-02-15

End Date: 2025-08-14

Contract Duration: 2,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DISA TIM III OKLAHOMA CITY

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73145

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $11.3 million to M. C. DEAN, INC. for work described as: DISA TIM III OKLAHOMA CITY Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining federal facilities. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding process for this service. 3. Performance risk appears moderate given the nature of facilities support services. 4. This contract aligns with broader government efforts to ensure operational readiness of federal sites. 5. The sector for facilities support services is mature and highly competitive.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $11.3 million for facilities support services appears reasonable for a multi-year engagement. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities management in federal buildings of comparable size and scope would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific award. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, full and open competition generally ensures a fair process and access to a wide range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple companies to vie for the contract, potentially leading to more competitive pricing and better service offerings.

Public Impact

Federal agencies operating in Oklahoma City will benefit from reliable facilities support services. The contract ensures the continued operation and maintenance of essential federal facilities. Geographic impact is concentrated in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. The contract supports jobs within the facilities management and maintenance sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if not clearly defined in task orders.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical facility functions could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract structure incentivizes cost control by the contractor.
Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Long-term contract duration provides stability for service delivery.

Sector Analysis

The facilities support services sector is a significant component of the broader commercial real estate and government contracting industries. It encompasses a wide range of services including maintenance, repair, operations, and management of buildings and infrastructure. Government spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need to maintain a vast portfolio of federal properties across the nation. This contract fits within the typical spending patterns for facility operations and maintenance.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate specific subcontracting goals for small businesses in the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine if M.C. Dean, Inc. has a history of subcontracting with small businesses on similar contracts or if there are any mandated small business participation requirements associated with this award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

Federal Buildings Fund
Government Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Public Building Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues impacting facility operations.
Reliance on contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $11.3 million to M. C. DEAN, INC.. DISA TIM III OKLAHOMA CITY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M. C. DEAN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-02-15. End: 2025-08-14.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the General Services Administration in Oklahoma City?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the GSA in Oklahoma City would require access to detailed procurement data over several fiscal years. This would involve identifying all contracts awarded for similar services in that geographic region, noting the awarded amounts, contract types, and incumbent contractors. A trend analysis could reveal whether spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether M.C. Dean, Inc. or other firms have been historically dominant. Such an analysis would help contextualize the current $11.3 million award and assess if it aligns with past investment levels or represents a significant shift in GSA's procurement strategy for facilities support in the area.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar facilities support services in Oklahoma City?

To compare the awarded price to market rates, one would need to conduct a market survey of private sector providers offering comparable facilities support services in the Oklahoma City metropolitan area. This would involve gathering quotes or published rates for services such as building maintenance, HVAC repair, janitorial services, and groundskeeping for commercial properties of similar size and complexity. The $11.3 million contract value, spread over its duration, would then be benchmarked against these private sector rates. Factors like the specific scope of services, service level agreements, and the government's unique requirements would need to be considered for a fair comparison. A significant deviation from market rates could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing.

What is M.C. Dean, Inc.'s track record with federal facilities support contracts?

M.C. Dean, Inc. has a substantial track record in providing facilities support and engineering services to various government agencies. A review of their contract history would likely reveal numerous awards for similar services across different federal installations. Key aspects to examine would include past performance evaluations, any instances of contract disputes or terminations, and their success in meeting performance metrics on previous contracts. Understanding their experience with large-scale, multi-year federal contracts is crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute this $11.3 million award and manage the associated risks effectively.

What are the primary performance metrics and potential risks associated with this facilities support contract?

The primary performance metrics for this facilities support contract would likely revolve around maintaining operational readiness, ensuring timely response to maintenance requests, adherence to safety standards, and overall facility upkeep. Potential risks include unforeseen infrastructure failures requiring extensive repairs, contractor performance deficiencies leading to service disruptions, and challenges in managing a comprehensive scope of services. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts cost overrun risks to the contractor, but performance risks remain a key concern for the government. Effective oversight and clear communication channels are vital to mitigate these risks and ensure contract success.

How does this contract's value compare to other GSA facilities support contracts nationwide?

To compare this $11.3 million contract to other GSA facilities support contracts nationwide, one would need to analyze a broader dataset of GSA awards within the same service category (NAICS 561210). This comparison should consider contract duration, scope of services, and the size and type of facilities being supported. The value of this contract should be assessed relative to the average contract size and the range of contract values within the GSA's portfolio. This helps determine if the $11.3 million award is typical, high, or low for the services being procured, providing context on the government's investment in facilities management across different regions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID08200004

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1765 GREENSBORO STATION PL, TYSONS, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,195,891

Exercised Options: $12,899,760

Current Obligation: $11,295,897

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 15

Total Subaward Amount: $733,613

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSHA18D0011

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline