GSA awards $13.5M BPA Call for facilities engineering services at Kansas City federal buildings

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,483,346 ($13.5M)

Contractor: NV Enterprises, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-02-01

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ORDER OF BPA CALL TO PROVIDE FACILITIES ENGINEERING SERVICES AT THE CHARLES EVANS WHITTAKER US COURTHOUSE AND RICHARD BOLLING FEDERAL BUILDING, KANSAS CITY, MO. POP: 2/1/2022 - 07/31/2022

Place of Performance

Location: KANSAS CITY, JACKSON County, MISSOURI, 64106

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $13.5 million to NV ENTERPRISES, INC. for work described as: ORDER OF BPA CALL TO PROVIDE FACILITIES ENGINEERING SERVICES AT THE CHARLES EVANS WHITTAKER US COURTHOUSE AND RICHARD BOLLING FEDERAL BUILDING, KANSAS CITY, MO. POP: 2/1/2022 - 07/31/2022 Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. Services are for facilities engineering at two specific federal courthouses in Kansas City, MO. 4. The period of performance spans over 1800 days, indicating a long-term need. 5. The awardee, NV ENTERPRISES, INC., is a new entity in federal contracting based on available data. 6. The contract value is substantial, reflecting significant facility management requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this BPA Call is challenging without specific service details or comparable contract data. The total value of $13.5 million over approximately five years suggests an average annual spend of around $2.7 million. This figure needs to be assessed against the scope of facilities engineering services required for two large federal buildings. Without more granular information on the specific services (e.g., HVAC maintenance, electrical, plumbing, structural repairs), it's difficult to definitively assess pricing or value for money. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This BPA Call was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment. A competitive process is expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation as contractors vie for the award. The GSA's use of full and open competition for facilities services aligns with federal acquisition regulations aimed at maximizing value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that is intended to secure the best possible pricing and service quality for essential federal building operations.

Public Impact

Federal employees and the public using the Charles Evans Whittaker US Courthouse and Richard Bolling Federal Building will benefit from maintained and operational facilities. Essential facilities engineering services, likely including maintenance and repair of building systems, will be delivered. The geographic impact is concentrated in Kansas City, Missouri, supporting federal infrastructure in that region. The contract supports jobs within the facilities engineering and maintenance sector, potentially benefiting local workers in the Kansas City area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The awardee, NV ENTERPRISES, INC., appears to be a relatively new entity in federal contracting, raising questions about its past performance and capacity for large-scale federal projects.
Limited public information on NV ENTERPRISES, INC. makes it difficult to assess its track record, financial stability, and ability to meet the demands of this significant contract.
The specific scope of 'facilities engineering services' is broad and could encompass a wide range of activities, making it hard to gauge the true value and potential risks without further detail.

Positive Signals

The contract was awarded through a full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair selection process.
The Firm Fixed Price contract type transfers cost overrun risks to the contractor, providing budget predictability for the government.
The General Services Administration (GSA) is a reputable agency with established procurement processes, lending credibility to the award.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, represent a significant segment of the federal services market. This sector encompasses a wide range of activities from building operations and maintenance to specialized engineering services. Federal agencies, particularly those managing large portfolios of buildings like the GSA, are substantial consumers of these services. Spending in this area is driven by the need to maintain aging infrastructure, ensure operational efficiency, and comply with safety and environmental regulations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale facilities management contracts awarded by the GSA or other agencies for similar types of federal properties.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data indicates the awardee, NV ENTERPRISES, INC., is not listed as a small business. Therefore, there are no direct small business set-aside implications. However, the potential for subcontracting opportunities with NV ENTERPRISES, INC. could exist, depending on the contractor's strategy and the specific requirements of the BPA Call. Analysis of subcontracting plans would be necessary to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. The GSA has established contract administration and oversight mechanisms to monitor performance, ensure compliance with contract terms, and manage payments. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which penalizes the contractor for cost overruns. The specific Inspector General jurisdiction would likely be that of the GSA's Office of Inspector General, which investigates fraud, waste, and abuse in GSA programs and contracts.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Buildings Fund
Public Buildings Service Operations
Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Architectural and Engineering Services

Risk Flags

New Contractor Performance Risk
Scope Definition Ambiguity
Potential for Unforeseen Maintenance Issues

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $13.5 million to NV ENTERPRISES, INC.. ORDER OF BPA CALL TO PROVIDE FACILITIES ENGINEERING SERVICES AT THE CHARLES EVANS WHITTAKER US COURTHOUSE AND RICHARD BOLLING FEDERAL BUILDING, KANSAS CITY, MO. POP: 2/1/2022 - 07/31/2022

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NV ENTERPRISES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-02-01. End: 2027-01-31.

What is the specific track record of NV ENTERPRISES, INC. with federal contracts, particularly in facilities engineering?

Based on the provided data, NV ENTERPRISES, INC. appears to be a relatively new entrant into the federal contracting space. Detailed historical performance data, including past contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and any prior experience with similar facilities engineering services for federal agencies, is not readily available or extensive. This lack of a substantial federal contracting history makes it challenging to assess their proven capabilities, reliability, and capacity to successfully execute a multi-year, multi-million dollar BPA Call. Further due diligence would be required to understand their operational capacity, financial stability, and any relevant private sector or state/local government experience that might indicate their suitability for this federal role.

How does the $13.5 million value compare to similar facilities engineering contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

The $13.5 million value for a five-year BPA Call for facilities engineering services at two federal courthouses is a significant award. To benchmark this effectively, one would need to compare it against similar contracts for facilities management and engineering services awarded by the GSA or other agencies managing large federal building portfolios. Factors such as the size and complexity of the facilities, the specific services included (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing, structural, janitorial), the geographic location, and the contract duration are crucial for a meaningful comparison. Without these specific details, it's difficult to definitively state whether this represents a high, low, or average value. However, for large federal buildings, this level of spending is not uncommon for comprehensive facilities support.

What are the primary risks associated with awarding a large facilities engineering contract to a potentially less experienced contractor like NV ENTERPRISES, INC.?

The primary risks associated with awarding a significant facilities engineering contract to a contractor with limited federal experience, such as NV ENTERPRISES, INC., include potential performance deficiencies, cost overruns (despite the FFP structure, scope creep or unforeseen issues can arise), schedule delays, and inadequate responsiveness to critical maintenance needs. There's also a risk related to the contractor's financial stability and capacity to manage the operational demands of maintaining large federal facilities. Furthermore, if the contractor lacks robust safety protocols or experienced personnel, it could lead to workplace accidents or damage to government property. The government might also face challenges in exercising remedies or enforcing contract terms if the contractor proves unable to meet obligations.

How effective is the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type in managing costs and ensuring service quality for facilities engineering?

The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective for managing costs in services where the scope of work is well-defined and unlikely to change significantly. For facilities engineering, FFP shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, providing the government with budget certainty. This incentivizes the contractor to control costs and perform efficiently. However, for services that are inherently variable or require significant adaptation (e.g., emergency repairs, unforeseen structural issues), FFP can sometimes lead to contractors being hesitant to perform work outside the narrowly defined scope, potentially requiring change orders or impacting service quality if not managed carefully. Clear performance standards and quality assurance surveillance are crucial to ensure service quality under FFP.

What is the historical spending trend for facilities support services by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in Missouri?

Analyzing historical spending trends for facilities support services by the GSA's Public Buildings Service specifically within Missouri would require access to detailed historical contract data, likely from sources like FPDS or GSA's internal financial systems. This data would need to be filtered for the relevant NAICS codes (e.g., 561210) and geographic region (Missouri). Without direct access to such granular historical data, it's impossible to provide specific spending trends. However, it is generally understood that agencies like GSA manage vast real estate portfolios, and spending on facilities operations and maintenance is a consistent and substantial component of their budget, driven by the need to maintain federal properties across all states, including Missouri.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PG0121Q0006

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13800 COPPERMINE RD STE 301, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,278,071

Exercised Options: $13,483,346

Current Obligation: $13,483,346

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PG0122A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline