GSA awards $4.5M for project management and technical support, with AECOM Technical Services Inc. securing the contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,552,682 ($4.6M)

Contractor: AECOM Technical Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-09-28

End Date: 2027-02-11

Contract Duration: 1,597 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, VARIOUS LOCATIONS REGION 5.

Place of Performance

Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60604

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4.6 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. for work described as: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, VARIOUS LOCATIONS REGION 5. Key points: 1. The contract value of $4.5M over approximately 5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 3. The contract is firm-fixed-price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The services are for project management and technical support, crucial for infrastructure operations. 5. The geographic scope is Region 5, suggesting a focus on a specific operational area. 6. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is the awardee, implying a known entity in the engineering services sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.5M over nearly 5 years averages around $910,000 annually. Without specific benchmarks for similar project management and technical support contracts within GSA Region 5, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for the government, as it caps potential cost overruns. The number of bidders (3) suggests some level of competition, which can help in achieving reasonable pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Three bids were received. This level of competition, while not extensive, suggests that the General Services Administration sought to leverage market capabilities and achieve competitive pricing. The presence of multiple bidders allows for a degree of price discovery and selection of the most advantageous offer.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality services compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Federal agencies within GSA Region 5 will benefit from enhanced project management and technical support for their facilities. The contract supports the operational efficiency and maintenance of public buildings. The geographic impact is concentrated within GSA Region 5, which includes Illinois. The services provided are essential for the upkeep and modernization of federal infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited number of bidders (3) may not represent the full spectrum of market capabilities.
Potential for scope creep in project management services if not tightly managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical support functions could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Award to an established firm (AECOM) suggests a degree of confidence in their capabilities.
Full and open competition provides a baseline for market price discovery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting project management and technical functions for federal facilities. The market for these services is broad, encompassing numerous firms capable of providing specialized expertise. GSA's Public Buildings Service often procures such services to ensure the effective management and maintenance of its vast real estate portfolio. Benchmarking would require comparison to similar contracts for facility management and technical support within the federal government or large-scale private sector projects.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and the awardee is AECOM Technical Services, Inc., a large business. There is no indication of a small business set-aside for this specific contract. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist if AECOM chooses to utilize them, but this is not guaranteed by the contract terms. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless significant subcontracting occurs.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. As a firm-fixed-price contract, performance monitoring will focus on adherence to scope, schedule, and quality standards. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, with potential remedies for non-performance. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

GSA Facilities Management Contracts
Federal Engineering Services
Public Buildings Service Operations
Project Management Support Services

Risk Flags

Limited number of bidders
Potential for scope creep

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4.6 million to AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES, U.S. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, VARIOUS LOCATIONS REGION 5.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-28. End: 2027-02-11.

What is the historical spending pattern for project management and technical support services by the GSA?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently spends significant amounts on project management and technical support services to manage its vast portfolio of federal buildings and real estate. While specific historical data for this exact contract type and region is not provided, GSA's annual spending across various service categories, including engineering, architectural, and facilities management, typically runs into billions of dollars. This contract, valued at $4.5M over approximately five years, represents a relatively small portion of GSA's overall operational budget for such services. Analyzing past GSA solicitations and awards for similar services would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services most frequently procured, providing context for the current award.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar services procured by other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the pricing of this $4.5M contract against similar services procured by other federal agencies requires access to detailed pricing data and service scope comparisons, which are not fully available in the provided data. However, the contract's firm-fixed-price nature suggests that the contractor, AECOM Technical Services, Inc., has assumed the cost risk. The average annual value of approximately $910,000 for project management and technical support services within GSA Region 5 can be compared to industry benchmarks for engineering and management consulting services. Factors such as geographic location, specific technical requirements, and the level of competition can significantly influence pricing. Without more granular data on the specific tasks and deliverables, a precise comparison is difficult, but the presence of three bidders suggests a degree of market validation for the proposed pricing.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s performance under this contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not explicitly detailed in the provided data. However, for project management and technical support services, typical KPIs would likely include adherence to project timelines, budget management, quality of deliverables (e.g., reports, plans, technical assessments), responsiveness to GSA requests, and overall client satisfaction. Given the firm-fixed-price nature, meeting schedule milestones and delivering services within the agreed-upon scope without cost overruns would be critical performance areas. GSA's Public Buildings Service would establish specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) KPIs during the contract's performance period to monitor AECOM's effectiveness and ensure value for taxpayer money.

What is AECOM Technical Services, Inc.'s track record with the federal government, particularly with GSA?

AECOM Technical Services, Inc. is a significant federal contractor with a substantial history of performing work for various government agencies, including the General Services Administration (GSA). Their portfolio typically includes large-scale engineering, construction management, and technical support services for infrastructure projects. While specific details of their past performance on GSA contracts are not provided here, AECOM generally has a well-established presence and a broad range of capabilities relevant to managing and supporting federal facilities. Their track record would be assessed by GSA during the procurement process, and any past performance issues or successes would influence the award decision and ongoing contract management.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Potential risks for this contract include scope creep, where the project's requirements expand beyond the initial agreement, potentially leading to cost increases or schedule delays, although the firm-fixed-price structure mitigates direct cost impact on the government. Another risk is contractor performance failure, where AECOM may not deliver services to the required standard. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract management by GSA, including clear definition of scope, regular performance reviews, and established procedures for addressing issues. The limited number of bidders (three) could also be seen as a risk if it implies insufficient market competition, potentially leading to less favorable pricing or innovation. GSA mitigates this by ensuring the solicitation is widely advertised under full and open competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PF0022Q0220

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 300 S GRAND AVE FL 9, LOS ANGELES, CA, 90071

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,333,562

Exercised Options: $4,552,682

Current Obligation: $4,552,682

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $1,815,554

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PD0319A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline