GSA awards $27K for elevator AC unit replacement at Tallahassee Courthouse, completed in 90 days
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,158 ($27.2K)
Contractor: Satellite Services Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-10
End Date: 2026-07-09
Contract Duration: 90 days
Daily Burn Rate: $302/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TITLE: ELEVATOR AC UNIT REPLACEMENT. LOCATION: TALLAHASSEE US COURTHOUSE 110 E. PARK AVE TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301
Place of Performance
Location: TALLAHASSEE, LEON County, FLORIDA, 32301
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $27,157.8 to SATELLITE SERVICES INC for work described as: TITLE: ELEVATOR AC UNIT REPLACEMENT. LOCATION: TALLAHASSEE US COURTHOUSE 110 E. PARK AVE TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized equipment replacement over a short duration. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process was utilized. 3. Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The contract duration of 90 days is appropriate for the scope of work. 5. This contract falls under facilities support services, a common need for federal buildings.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $27,157.80 for elevator AC unit replacement seems aligned with typical costs for such specialized maintenance in federal facilities. Benchmarking against similar projects for elevator system components in courthouses of comparable size would provide further validation. The firm-fixed-price structure is advantageous, locking in costs and reducing the risk of unexpected expenses for the General Services Administration (GSA). The 90-day performance period is standard for this type of repair or replacement work.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is expected to lead to more favorable pricing and terms for the government. The use of a BPA Call suggests a pre-negotiated agreement was leveraged, potentially streamlining the process while still allowing for competition among eligible vendors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by promoting a marketplace where multiple vendors vie for the contract, driving down costs and improving service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and visitors of the Tallahassee Courthouse, ensuring a comfortable and functional environment. The service delivered is the replacement of a critical elevator air conditioning unit. The geographic impact is localized to the Tallahassee Courthouse in Florida. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team of specialized technicians for installation and testing.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific bidder count prevents a full assessment of competitive intensity.
- No detailed breakdown of costs (labor, parts) is available for granular value analysis.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract limits financial risk for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
- BPA Call usage indicates potential for streamlined procurement and pre-negotiated terms.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, specifically addressing building maintenance and repair. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 561210, Facilities Support Services, encompasses a broad range of services including building operations and maintenance. Spending in this category is consistent across federal agencies managing physical infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for HVAC system replacements or major repairs in similar federal buildings across different regions.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the competition was open to all eligible firms, and the primary contractor, SATELLITE SERVICES INC, is likely not a small business or the nature of the work did not lend itself to a small business set-aside. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to participate as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a firm-fixed-price contract awarded through full and open competition, oversight would focus on ensuring timely completion, adherence to specifications, and quality of work. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
- HVAC System Replacements
- General Services Administration Procurement
- Courthouse Facility Management
Risk Flags
- Limited bidder information
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown
Tags
facilities-support-services, hvac, elevator-maintenance, general-services-administration, tallahassee, florida, firm-fixed-price, bpa-call, full-and-open-competition, courthouse, building-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $27,157.8 to SATELLITE SERVICES INC. TITLE: ELEVATOR AC UNIT REPLACEMENT. LOCATION: TALLAHASSEE US COURTHOUSE 110 E. PARK AVE TALLAHASSEE, FL 32301
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SATELLITE SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27,157.8.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-07-09.
What is the track record of SATELLITE SERVICES INC with the federal government?
Information regarding the specific track record of SATELLITE SERVICES INC with the federal government is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require accessing federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review past performance, contract history, types of services rendered, and any past performance evaluations or disputes. This would help assess their reliability, experience, and history of successful contract completion, particularly for similar facility maintenance or HVAC projects. Without this data, it's difficult to gauge their established performance level beyond this single award.
How does the awarded price compare to similar elevator AC unit replacement contracts?
The provided data does not include specific details on the components of the $27,157.80 cost (e.g., labor, parts, equipment). To benchmark this price, one would need to compare it against similar contracts for elevator AC unit replacements in federal courthouses or similar government buildings of comparable size and complexity, ideally within the same geographic region or with similar climate considerations. Factors such as the specific make and model of the AC unit, the complexity of the elevator system integration, and the labor rates in Tallahassee would influence the cost. A preliminary assessment suggests the price is within a reasonable range for specialized equipment replacement over a 90-day period, but a detailed comparison with publicly available contract data is necessary for a definitive conclusion.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?
The primary risks associated with this contract include potential delays in installation, unforeseen technical issues with the elevator system integration, or the possibility of the replacement unit not meeting performance specifications. The firm-fixed-price contract structure is a key mitigation strategy, as it caps the government's financial exposure regardless of cost overruns incurred by the contractor. The 90-day performance period also provides a defined timeframe, allowing for timely follow-up and accountability. Additionally, the use of full and open competition suggests a selection process that likely vetted the contractor's technical capability, further reducing performance risk.
How effective is the General Services Administration (GSA) in managing facility maintenance contracts like this one?
The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary agency responsible for managing federal real estate and facility maintenance. Their effectiveness in managing contracts like the elevator AC unit replacement can be assessed through various indicators, including contract performance metrics, cost-efficiency of their procurement processes, and the overall condition and functionality of the federal buildings they manage. GSA utilizes standardized procurement procedures, including competitive bidding, to ensure value. While specific performance data for this single contract isn't available, GSA's long-standing role suggests established processes for oversight, though like any large organization, performance can vary across different contracts and service areas.
What is the historical spending pattern for elevator maintenance and replacement at the Tallahassee Courthouse?
Historical spending data for elevator maintenance and replacement specifically at the Tallahassee Courthouse is not provided in this data snippet. To analyze this, one would need to query federal procurement databases for past contracts awarded to maintain or replace elevator systems at this specific facility. This would involve looking at the frequency of such awards, the contract values over time, and the contractors involved. Understanding historical spending can reveal trends in maintenance needs, potential cost escalations, and the reliability of previous solutions, providing context for the current award's value and necessity.
Does the use of a BPA Call impact the overall value for money compared to a direct award?
Using a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, as indicated here, generally enhances value for money compared to a sole-source or less competitive direct award. BPAs are established with pre-qualified vendors, often through a competitive process, allowing agencies to procure specific goods or services quickly and efficiently. A BPA Call leverages these pre-negotiated terms and pricing. When combined with full and open competition for the specific call (if applicable, or if the underlying BPA was competed broadly), it typically results in competitive pricing. The efficiency gained in procurement time and administrative costs also contributes to overall value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: EQPMAE-26-0128
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 309 S FRONT ST, MARQUETTE, MI, 49855
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,158
Exercised Options: $27,158
Current Obligation: $27,158
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47PE0720A0001
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-10
Current End Date: 2026-07-09
Potential End Date: 2026-07-09 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-02
More Contracts from Satellite Services Inc
- Base Operational Services AT March ARB CA — $69.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200507!000032!5700!fa4664!452msg/Lgc !FA466405C0001 !A!N! !N! ! !20050112!20060131!050713650!050713650!050713650!n!satellite Services, Inc !309 South Front ST !marquette !mi!49855!45680!065!06!march AFB !riverside !california!+000000091368!n!n!000025599644!m119!operation/Other Administrative & Service Buildings!s1 !services !000 !* !561210!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!006!k! !C!Y!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! !FA4664!0001! ! — $57.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200409!000041!5700!MA22 !914 Aw/Lgc !FA667004C0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20040504!20050531!050713650!050713650!050713650!n!satellite Services, Inc !309 South Front ST !marquette !mi!49855!51060!063!36!niagara Falls Intern!niagara !NEW York !+000004388609!n!n!000004388609!s216!facilities Operations Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!005!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !Z! !B!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $48.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $34.8M (Department of Labor)
- Federal Contract — $23.5M (Department of Labor)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)