DoD Awards $48.9M for Facilities Support Services to Satellite Services Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $48,911,941 ($48.9M)
Contractor: Satellite Services Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2004-05-04
End Date: 2014-11-18
Contract Duration: 3,850 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200409!000041!5700!MA22 !914 AW/LGC !FA667004C0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20040504!20050531!050713650!050713650!050713650!N!SATELLITE SERVICES, INC !309 SOUTH FRONT ST !MARQUETTE !MI!49855!51060!063!36!NIAGARA FALLS INTERN!NIAGARA !NEW YORK !+000004388609!N!N!000004388609!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!005!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !Z! !B!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: NIAGARA FALLS, NIAGARA County, NEW YORK, 14304, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $48.9 million to SATELLITE SERVICES INC for work described as: 200409!000041!5700!MA22 !914 AW/LGC !FA667004C0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20040504!20050531!050713650!050713650!050713650!N!SATELLITE SERVICES, INC !309 SOUTH FRONT ST !MARQUETTE !MI!49855!51060!063!36!NIAGARA FALLS INTERN!NIAGARA !NEW YORK !+000004388609!N!N!000004388609!S216!FACILITIES O… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Satellite Services Inc. for facilities support. 2. The contract value is $48,911,940.68. 3. Competition method was 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'. 4. The contract duration is 3850 days. 5. The primary NAICS code is 561210.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $48.9M over approximately 10.5 years suggests a moderate annual spend. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts would be necessary to determine if this pricing is competitive.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', indicating a limited competition. This method may impact price discovery and potentially lead to higher costs compared to unrestricted full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for facilities support services. The limited competition raises questions about whether the best possible price was achieved.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness through essential facilities maintenance and support. Supports military personnel and operations at the specified Air Force installation. Provides a stable service provider for long-term facility needs. Potential for cost savings if competition were broader.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition raises cost concerns.
- Long contract duration may not reflect current market rates.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Provides essential services for operational continuity.
- Awarded to a single, established vendor for consistency.
- Clear contract scope for facilities operations.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a broad category encompassing a range of services essential for maintaining government and commercial properties. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on the scope and location of the facilities.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-aside opportunities were considered or if there were justifications for excluding them.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation suggests a specific justification was made for limiting the pool of potential bidders. Oversight should ensure this justification was valid and that the pricing remains competitive throughout the contract's life.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may lead to higher costs.
- Long contract duration could result in outdated pricing.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Potential for vendor lock-in due to specialized services.
- Need for robust performance monitoring.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, ny, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $48.9 million to SATELLITE SERVICES INC. 200409!000041!5700!MA22 !914 AW/LGC !FA667004C0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20040504!20050531!050713650!050713650!050713650!N!SATELLITE SERVICES, INC !309 SOUTH FRONT ST !MARQUETTE !MI!49855!51060!063!36!NIAGARA FALLS INTERN!NIAGARA !NEW YORK !+000004388609!N!N!000004388609!S216!FACILITIES OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!J!2!005!K! !C!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !Z! !B!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SATELLITE SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $48.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-05-04. End: 2014-11-18.
What was the specific justification for excluding other sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award?
The justification for excluding other sources would typically involve technical capabilities, unique requirements, or specific circumstances that limit the number of eligible contractors. Without the specific justification document, it's impossible to determine the exact reasons, but it implies that only Satellite Services Inc. met certain stringent criteria or that a prior contract existed which led to this approach.
How does the per-unit cost of services under this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar facilities support contracts?
A comprehensive comparison requires detailed line-item data from the contract and access to industry benchmark databases. Given the contract's duration and scope, a direct comparison is difficult without more granular information. However, the limited competition suggests a potential risk that the pricing may not be as optimized as it could be under broader competition.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of facilities support services provided by Satellite Services Inc. over the contract's long duration?
Effectiveness and quality are typically ensured through performance metrics, service level agreements (SLAs), regular inspections, and contractor performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS). The Department of Defense would have oversight mechanisms to monitor contractor performance and address any deficiencies to ensure the services meet the required standards throughout the contract term.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 309 SOUTH FRONT ST, MARQUETTE, MI, 49855
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $54,069,090
Exercised Options: $74,470,316
Current Obligation: $48,911,941
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-05-04
Current End Date: 2014-11-18
Potential End Date: 2014-11-18 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-03-10
More Contracts from Satellite Services Inc
- Base Operational Services AT March ARB CA — $69.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200507!000032!5700!fa4664!452msg/Lgc !FA466405C0001 !A!N! !N! ! !20050112!20060131!050713650!050713650!050713650!n!satellite Services, Inc !309 South Front ST !marquette !mi!49855!45680!065!06!march AFB !riverside !california!+000000091368!n!n!000025599644!m119!operation/Other Administrative & Service Buildings!s1 !services !000 !* !561210!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!006!k! !C!Y!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! !FA4664!0001! ! — $57.6M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $34.8M (Department of Labor)
- Federal Contract — $23.5M (Department of Labor)
- Airfield Mgmt Function — $22.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)