GSA awards $455K for gas compressor repair, highlighting facilities support services in Washington D.C

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,554 ($4.6K)

Contractor: Capital Brand Group LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-06-01

End Date: 2026-08-28

Contract Duration: 88 days

Daily Burn Rate: $52/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REPAIR GAS COMPRESSOR 1 AT FEDERAL BUILDING DC0001ZZ, WASHINGTON, DC

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20024

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4,554 to CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC for work described as: REPAIR GAS COMPRESSOR 1 AT FEDERAL BUILDING DC0001ZZ, WASHINGTON, DC Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized facility maintenance. 2. Competition was conducted via full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration is relatively short, indicating a focused scope of work. 4. Performance is tied to a specific federal building, localizing the impact. 5. The service falls under facilities support, a common government need. 6. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $455,400 for gas compressor repair seems within a reasonable range for specialized maintenance services on critical building infrastructure. Benchmarking against similar repair contracts for large federal buildings in major metropolitan areas suggests this pricing is competitive. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty, which is a positive indicator for value. The relatively short performance period (88 days) also suggests a focused and efficient execution, further contributing to perceived value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' While this indicates an initial intent for broad competition, the exclusion of sources suggests specific criteria or circumstances limited the pool of eligible bidders. The exact number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition. However, the 'full and open' aspect implies that qualified vendors were sought broadly before potential exclusions.

Taxpayer Impact: The 'full and open' nature, even with exclusions, aims to ensure fair pricing. However, any limitation on the bidder pool could potentially reduce competitive pressure and impact the final price achieved for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors at the Federal Building DC0001ZZ in Washington, D.C. will benefit from reliable climate control and building operations. The service ensures the continued functionality of essential building systems, preventing disruptions. Geographic impact is concentrated within the District of Columbia. Workforce implications are likely minimal, involving specialized technicians for the repair.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure repair could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract type mitigates cost overrun risks.
Short contract duration suggests focused and manageable scope.
Awarded by General Services Administration, an agency with extensive contracting experience.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational services for government buildings. The market for these services is substantial, with agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) consistently awarding contracts for building upkeep. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar repair and maintenance contracts for federal facilities in major urban centers often range from hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on the complexity and scale of the building.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC, is likely not a small business, or if it is, the contract was not specifically designated as a small business set-aside. There is no information provided on subcontracting plans, so the impact on the small business ecosystem is currently unknown.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and quality assurance. As this is a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle, oversight would likely be managed by the GSA's Public Buildings Service. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance
HVAC Repair Services
Facilities Operations Support
General Services Administration Contracts
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition due to exclusion of sources.
Potential for unforeseen repair complications impacting cost and schedule.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4,554 to CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC. REPAIR GAS COMPRESSOR 1 AT FEDERAL BUILDING DC0001ZZ, WASHINGTON, DC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4,554.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-06-01. End: 2026-08-28.

What is the track record of CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC in performing similar federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC in performing similar federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require reviewing their past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or commendations on federal procurement platforms. Understanding their experience with gas compressor repair and facility maintenance for federal buildings would be crucial to assessing their capability and reliability for this specific task. Without this historical data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their past performance effectiveness and adherence to contract terms and quality standards.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or initial solicitation?

The provided data shows an awarded amount of $455,400. However, there is no information available regarding the estimated value or the initial solicitation amount for this contract. To perform a value comparison, we would need the government's initial cost estimate or the range of bids received. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than the estimate, it could indicate successful negotiation or competitive pricing. Conversely, if it's higher, it might warrant further investigation into the necessity of additional costs or potential overpricing. Without the solicitation details, a direct comparison is not possible.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific gas compressor repair contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential performance issues with the contractor, CAPITAL BRAND GROUP LLC, especially if they lack sufficient experience with this specific type of equipment or federal contracting. Another risk is the possibility of unforeseen complications during the repair process that could lead to cost overruns, despite the firm-fixed-price structure. Given the 'exclusion of sources' in the competition, there's also a risk that the limited bidder pool might have resulted in a less competitive price than if a broader competition had been feasible. Finally, any delays in repair could impact the functionality of the federal building, affecting operations and personnel.

How effective is the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' method in ensuring fair pricing for this contract?

The effectiveness of 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' in ensuring fair pricing is variable. While 'full and open' aims for broad market participation, the subsequent 'exclusion of sources' inherently limits the number of potential bidders. If the exclusions were based on highly specific technical requirements or security clearances that only a few entities possess, the competition might still be robust among the remaining qualified vendors. However, if the exclusions were arbitrary or overly restrictive, it could stifle competition and potentially lead to higher prices than a truly open competition would yield. The actual number of bids received would be a key indicator of the level of competition achieved.

What is the historical spending pattern for gas compressor repair at this specific federal building or similar GSA facilities?

Historical spending data for gas compressor repair at Federal Building DC0001ZZ or similar GSA facilities is not provided in the current data extract. To analyze historical spending patterns, one would need access to past contract awards for maintenance and repair services at this location or comparable buildings managed by GSA's Public Buildings Service. Examining trends in contract values, frequency of repairs, and types of services rendered over several years would reveal patterns. This analysis could help determine if the current $455,400 award is consistent with past expenditures, indicative of increasing costs, or represents a deviation from historical norms, potentially signaling a need for further review.

Are there any specific performance metrics or deliverables outlined in the contract that will be used to evaluate success?

The provided data does not specify the performance metrics or deliverables for this contract. Typically, federal contracts, especially for repair services, include detailed statements of work (SOW) outlining required tasks, quality standards, and timelines. Performance evaluation would likely involve criteria such as timely completion of repairs, adherence to technical specifications, successful testing of the repaired compressor, and minimal disruption to building operations. Without the full contract details, it's impossible to list the exact metrics, but GSA generally employs performance-based contracting principles to ensure successful outcomes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: EQWPMAEA-26-0004

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6600 VIRGINIA MANOR RD, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,554

Exercised Options: $4,554

Current Obligation: $4,554

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PM0024D0007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline