GSA awards $9,551 for hot water pump repair, highlighting facilities support services needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,551 ($9.6K)

Contractor: Corporate Source, Inc the

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-07-10

Contract Duration: 91 days

Daily Burn Rate: $105/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REBUILD HOT WATER PUMP # 2$

Place of Performance

Location: GARDEN CITY, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11530

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $9,551.22 to CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE for work described as: REBUILD HOT WATER PUMP # 2$ Key points: 1. Contract focuses on essential facility maintenance, ensuring operational continuity. 2. Limited competition suggests potential for higher pricing or specialized contractor needs. 3. Short duration indicates a targeted repair rather than a long-term service agreement. 4. Fixed-price contract shifts risk to the contractor for cost overruns. 5. Geographic focus on New York highlights regional infrastructure requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $9,551 award for a hot water pump repair appears to be a routine maintenance task. Benchmarking this specific repair cost is challenging without more detail on the pump's model and the scope of work. However, for a single pump repair, the amount is within a reasonable range for specialized facilities maintenance, assuming it includes parts and labor. Compared to larger infrastructure projects, this is a minor expenditure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not openly competed. This could be due to the specialized nature of the repair, the urgency of the need, or a pre-existing relationship with a qualified vendor. The lack of competition means the government did not benefit from multiple bids to drive down the price or explore alternative solutions, potentially leading to a higher cost than if it had been competed.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit the government's ability to secure the best possible price through competitive bidding, potentially resulting in less value for taxpayer dollars on this specific repair.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors in the New York facility benefit from a functional hot water system. Essential facility services are maintained, ensuring a safe and comfortable working environment. The repair supports the operational continuity of the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service in New York. Local technicians or specialized repair services may be engaged for the work.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price competition.
Lack of detailed scope may obscure true value.
Short contract duration might indicate recurring issues.

Positive Signals

Addresses critical infrastructure need (hot water).
Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Clear end date for the service delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational services for government buildings. The market for these services is diverse, ranging from small local providers to large national corporations. Spending in this sector is consistent across federal agencies to maintain their physical infrastructure. This specific award is a small component of the overall federal spending on facilities management.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside. Given the sole-source nature and the specific task, it's unlikely that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would be significant unless the primary contractor utilizes them for specialized parts or labor. The impact on the small business ecosystem is minimal for this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. Accountability is managed through the contract terms and the fixed-price structure. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature and the relatively small dollar amount, which may not trigger extensive public reporting beyond basic award data. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if fraud or significant mismanagement were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Building Operations Support
General Services Administration Contracts
Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award may limit price competition.
Lack of detailed scope requires further clarification.
Contractor's specific expertise for this pump model is assumed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $9,551.22 to CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE. REBUILD HOT WATER PUMP # 2$

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9,551.22.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-07-10.

What is the specific type and model of the hot water pump being repaired?

The provided data does not specify the exact make or model of the hot water pump. This level of detail is crucial for accurately assessing the complexity of the repair and benchmarking the cost against similar services. Without this information, it's difficult to determine if the $9,551 is appropriate for the specific equipment involved. Further inquiry with the GSA would be needed to obtain the pump's specifications and the detailed scope of work for the repair.

What specific services are included in the $9,551 award for the hot water pump repair?

The award description 'REBUILD HOT WATER PUMP # 2' suggests a repair or refurbishment of a specific pump. However, the exact scope of work is not detailed. It could include diagnosis, parts replacement, labor, testing, and potentially system flushing or related plumbing work. The fixed-price nature implies the contractor is responsible for all costs to complete the defined scope. Clarification from the GSA would be necessary to understand the full extent of services covered by this award.

Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis?

The contract was designated as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source award. Common reasons for sole-sourcing include urgency, unique capabilities of a single contractor, or when only one source is reasonably available. For a pump repair, it might be that only one vendor has the proprietary knowledge, parts, or certifications to service this specific type of pump, or that the repair was needed immediately to prevent further damage or service disruption, precluding a lengthy competitive process.

What is the historical spending pattern for hot water pump repairs at this GSA facility in New York?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for this specific type of repair at the New York facility. To assess this, one would need to query federal procurement databases for similar contracts awarded to the same agency (GSA) and location (New York) over previous fiscal years, focusing on keywords related to 'hot water pump repair' or 'HVAC maintenance.' Analyzing past expenditures would help determine if this $9,551 award is consistent with previous investments or represents an increase.

What is the track record of Corporate Source, Inc. in performing similar facilities maintenance services for the federal government?

The data indicates that 'CORPORATE SOURCE, INC THE' is the contractor. To assess their track record, one would need to search federal contract databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for previous awards to this company. This would reveal their past performance history, including the types of services rendered, contract values, agencies served, and any reported performance issues or commendations. A review of their past performance is essential to gauge their reliability and capability for this hot water pump repair.

What is the potential risk associated with a sole-source award for a critical facility component like a hot water pump?

The primary risk of a sole-source award for a critical component like a hot water pump is the potential for inflated pricing due to the lack of competition. Without competing bids, the government may pay more than necessary. Additionally, there's a risk of vendor lock-in, where the agency becomes reliant on a single provider, potentially limiting future options or flexibility. However, if the sole-source justification is valid (e.g., unique expertise required), it can ensure the necessary specialized skills are applied, mitigating the risk of improper repair.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: EQPMAG-26/0230

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1225 FRANKLIN AVE STE 335, GARDEN CITY, NY, 11530

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,551

Exercised Options: $9,551

Current Obligation: $9,551

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0724D0001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline