GSA's $303K LED lighting upgrade for 23 courtrooms awarded to LB & B Associates Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $303,355 ($303.4K)

Contractor: LB & B Associates Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-07

End Date: 2026-07-07

Contract Duration: 91 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS REQUIRED TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING IN TWENTY-THREE (23) DESIGNATED COURTROOMS TO MODERN, ENERGY-EFFICIENT LED LIGHTING.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10007

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $303,354.62 to LB & B ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS REQUIRED TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING IN TWENTY-THREE (23) DESIGNATED COURTROOMS TO MODERN, ENERGY-EFFICIENT LED LIGHTING. Key points: 1. Focuses on energy efficiency improvements in federal court facilities. 2. Contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating defined costs. 3. Awarded under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting pre-negotiated terms. 4. Duration of 91 days for completion of work. 5. Geographic focus on New York. 6. Facilities Support Services sector, aligning with building operations and maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $303,354 for upgrading lighting in 23 courtrooms appears reasonable given the scope of work. This includes labor and materials for a transition to modern, energy-efficient LED lighting. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment, but the fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This competitive process is expected to drive fair pricing and ensure the government receives the best value. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the method of competition suggests a robust selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and higher quality services.

Public Impact

Federal court operations in New York will benefit from modernized lighting. Improved energy efficiency is expected to reduce long-term utility costs for the government. The project supports the modernization of federal infrastructure. Potential for enhanced working conditions for judges, staff, and the public within courtrooms.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for delays if unforeseen issues arise during the upgrade process.
Ensuring minimal disruption to ongoing court proceedings during the upgrade.
Verification of the long-term energy savings achieved by the LED conversion.

Positive Signals

Focus on energy efficiency aligns with federal sustainability goals.
Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost predictability.
Award through full and open competition suggests a competitive selection process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, which encompasses a broad range of services related to the operation and maintenance of buildings. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the continuous need for upkeep, modernization, and energy efficiency improvements in government and commercial properties. This specific project addresses the growing trend towards energy-efficient lighting solutions.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, this specific award does not directly impact the small business ecosystem through set-asides or mandated subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and quality assurance. As a public building service contract, it would likely be subject to GSA's internal review processes and potentially oversight from the GSA Inspector General to ensure compliance and proper execution.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Modernization Programs
Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants
General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for project delays
Risk of disruption to court operations
Ensuring long-term performance of LED fixtures

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $303,354.62 to LB & B ASSOCIATES INC. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS REQUIRED TO UPGRADE THE EXISTING FLUORESCENT LIGHTING IN TWENTY-THREE (23) DESIGNATED COURTROOMS TO MODERN, ENERGY-EFFICIENT LED LIGHTING.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LB & B ASSOCIATES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $303,354.62.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-07-07.

What is the track record of LB & B Associates Inc. with the General Services Administration?

Information regarding LB & B Associates Inc.'s specific track record with the General Services Administration (GSA) is not detailed in the provided data. However, their selection for this contract, awarded through full and open competition, suggests they met the necessary qualifications and demonstrated capability to perform the required facilities support services. Further analysis would require accessing GSA's contract database or performance evaluation reports for this contractor to understand their past performance, any issues encountered, and their overall reliability on similar federal contracts.

How does the cost per courtroom for this LED upgrade compare to similar federal projects?

The total contract value is approximately $303,354 for 23 courtrooms, equating to roughly $13,189 per courtroom. Without specific data on comparable federal LED lighting upgrade projects, a direct cost-per-unit comparison is challenging. However, this figure encompasses labor, materials, and project management for a full upgrade. Factors such as the complexity of existing infrastructure, the specific type of LED fixtures chosen, and the geographic location can significantly influence costs. A benchmark analysis against similar GSA or other agency projects would be necessary to definitively assess if this represents excellent, fair, or concerning value.

What are the primary risks associated with this LED lighting upgrade project?

The primary risks associated with this LED lighting upgrade project include potential disruptions to ongoing court operations during installation, the possibility of unforeseen technical challenges with existing electrical systems, and ensuring the selected LED fixtures meet long-term performance and energy-saving expectations. There's also a risk related to the contractor's ability to complete the project within the 91-day timeframe, especially if material procurement or labor availability becomes an issue. Ensuring proper disposal of old lighting components and adherence to safety protocols are also critical risk areas.

How effective is the current fluorescent lighting in these courtrooms in terms of energy consumption?

The provided data does not quantify the energy consumption of the existing fluorescent lighting systems in the 23 designated courtrooms. However, the contract explicitly states the upgrade is to 'modern, energy-efficient LED lighting,' implying that the current fluorescent systems are less efficient and consume more energy. LED technology is known for its significantly lower energy usage compared to fluorescent lighting, often resulting in savings of 50% or more. The effectiveness of the upgrade will be measured by the realized energy savings post-installation.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in New York?

The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for facilities support services by the GSA's Public Buildings Service in New York. To analyze this, one would need access to historical GSA procurement data, looking at contracts awarded under NAICS code 561210 (Facilities Support Services) within the New York region over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the distribution of awards among contractors, providing context for the current $303K LED lighting upgrade.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQPMAG-26-0171-AM0001

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 9891 BROKEN LAND PKWY, COLUMBIA, MD, 21046

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $303,355

Exercised Options: $303,355

Current Obligation: $303,355

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0622A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline