GSA awards $4.1M for fire pump room door replacement at Boston JFK Federal Building
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $4,089 ($4.1K)
Contractor: Satellite Services Inc
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-10
End Date: 2026-07-10
Contract Duration: 91 days
Daily Burn Rate: $45/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: BOSTON JFK FB REPLACE FIRE PUMP ROOM DOORS, BOSTON MA
Place of Performance
Location: BOSTON, SUFFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02203
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $4,089.03 to SATELLITE SERVICES INC for work described as: BOSTON JFK FB REPLACE FIRE PUMP ROOM DOORS, BOSTON MA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized facility maintenance. 2. Full and open competition suggests potential for competitive pricing. 3. Short performance period may indicate a focused scope of work. 4. Fixed-price contract shifts risk to the contractor. 5. Location in a major federal building implies critical infrastructure importance.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $4.1 million for replacing fire pump room doors at the Boston JFK Federal Building is within a reasonable range for specialized facility upgrades. While specific benchmarking is difficult without detailed scope, the fixed-price nature of the contract suggests the government has a clear understanding of the requirements and associated costs. The duration of 91 days for the performance period indicates a focused and potentially efficient execution plan. Compared to similar projects involving critical building systems, this award seems to represent fair value, assuming the scope aligns with industry standards for such replacements.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this procurement method generally fosters a competitive environment, which is beneficial for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing. The exclusion of sources clause might suggest specific technical requirements or past performance considerations that narrowed the field slightly from a purely open bid.
Taxpayer Impact: This competitive approach helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. A wider pool of bidders typically leads to more favorable pricing for the government.
Public Impact
Federal employees and visitors at the Boston JFK Federal Building will benefit from enhanced safety and operational reliability. The contract delivers essential infrastructure maintenance services, ensuring the continued functionality of critical building systems. The geographic impact is localized to Boston, Massachusetts, specifically within the JFK Federal Building. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for skilled tradespeople involved in construction and facility maintenance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific bidder count limits assessment of true competition intensity.
- Absence of detailed scope of work makes precise value benchmarking challenging.
- Potential for unforeseen issues in older building infrastructure could lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
- Short performance period indicates a focused and potentially efficient project timeline.
- Contractor is Satellite Services Inc., whose track record would need further review for performance history.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government buildings. The market for these services is substantial, driven by the government's extensive real estate portfolio. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar infrastructure upgrades in federal buildings can vary widely based on size, complexity, and location. This specific award for door replacement within a fire pump room addresses a critical safety and operational need, fitting into the broader category of building systems maintenance and upgrade contracts.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through set-asides is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor, Satellite Services Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors to fulfill parts of the contract requirements. An analysis of subcontracting plans would be necessary to fully assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service (PBS), which is responsible for federal building management. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to complete the work for the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed project progress reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
- Infrastructure Modernization Programs
- Public Facilities Management
- Safety Systems Upgrades
Risk Flags
- Potential for unforeseen conditions in older federal buildings.
- Reliance on contractor's past performance data (not provided).
Tags
facilities-support-services, general-services-administration, boston, massachusetts, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, infrastructure-maintenance, safety-systems, federal-building
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $4,089.03 to SATELLITE SERVICES INC. BOSTON JFK FB REPLACE FIRE PUMP ROOM DOORS, BOSTON MA
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SATELLITE SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $4,089.03.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-07-10.
What is the specific scope of work for replacing the fire pump room doors?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'BOSTON JFK FB REPLACE FIRE PUMP ROOM DOORS, BOSTON MA' with a value of $4,089.03 and a duration of 91 days. However, the specific scope of work is not detailed. This would typically include the removal of existing doors, installation of new fire-rated doors meeting specific safety codes (e.g., NFPA standards), associated hardware, potential modifications to the door frame, and ensuring proper sealing and functionality. The exact specifications for the doors (material, fire rating, size) and any required demolition or construction would be outlined in the detailed contract statement of work, which is not available in the provided summary data.
How does the contract value of $4.1 million compare to similar fire pump room door replacement projects?
Benchmarking the $4.1 million contract value for fire pump room door replacement is challenging without a detailed scope of work and specific project requirements. However, for a single federal building, this value suggests a significant undertaking, potentially involving more than just basic door replacement. Factors influencing cost include the size and number of doors, the required fire rating, specialized materials, the complexity of the existing structure, and the need for specialized safety protocols during installation in a critical area. If this includes substantial structural modifications or upgrades beyond simple door replacement, the cost could be justified. A more precise comparison would require data on similar projects with identical specifications and geographic locations.
What are the potential risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
Potential risks include unforeseen structural issues within the existing building infrastructure, delays in material procurement, contractor performance issues, and potential scope creep. The firm-fixed-price contract structure mitigates financial risk for the government by capping the cost. The short performance period (91 days) suggests a focused effort, potentially reducing the window for delays. The 'Full and Open Competition' award method implies the selection of a capable contractor, but ongoing oversight by the GSA would be crucial to monitor progress, ensure quality, and address any emerging issues promptly. A detailed statement of work and clear acceptance criteria are key to managing scope.
What is the track record of Satellite Services Inc. for similar government contracts?
The provided data identifies Satellite Services Inc. as the contractor but does not include details on their past performance or track record with similar government contracts. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their contract history, including past performance evaluations, any reported issues or disputes, and their experience with facility maintenance, particularly involving critical building systems like fire pumps. Without this information, it's difficult to gauge their reliability and expertise for this specific project. This information is typically available through government contract databases and past performance reporting systems.
What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at the Boston JFK Federal Building?
The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Boston JFK Federal Building. To analyze this, one would need to examine past contracts awarded for maintenance, repair, and upgrades at this specific location over several fiscal years. This would involve searching federal procurement databases for contracts issued to the GSA for the JFK Federal Building. Understanding historical spending would help contextualize the current $4.1 million award, revealing whether it represents a typical investment, an increase due to specific needs, or a deviation from past expenditure levels for similar services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 309 S FRONT ST STE 309, MARQUETTE, MI, 49855
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,089
Exercised Options: $4,089
Current Obligation: $4,089
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47PB0021D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-10
Current End Date: 2026-07-10
Potential End Date: 2026-08-10 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from Satellite Services Inc
- Base Operational Services AT March ARB CA — $69.2M (Department of Defense)
- 200507!000032!5700!fa4664!452msg/Lgc !FA466405C0001 !A!N! !N! ! !20050112!20060131!050713650!050713650!050713650!n!satellite Services, Inc !309 South Front ST !marquette !mi!49855!45680!065!06!march AFB !riverside !california!+000000091368!n!n!000025599644!m119!operation/Other Administrative & Service Buildings!s1 !services !000 !* !561210!A!B!3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!006!k! !C!Y!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !b!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! !FA4664!0001! ! — $57.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200409!000041!5700!MA22 !914 Aw/Lgc !FA667004C0003 !A!N! !N! ! !20040504!20050531!050713650!050713650!050713650!n!satellite Services, Inc !309 South Front ST !marquette !mi!49855!51060!063!36!niagara Falls Intern!niagara !NEW York !+000004388609!n!n!000004388609!s216!facilities Operations Support Services !S1 !services !000 !* !561210!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!005!k! !C!N!Z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !Z! !B!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $48.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $34.8M (Department of Labor)
- Federal Contract — $23.5M (Department of Labor)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)