GSA awards $1.1M patio renovation contract to Integrated Construction Enterprises Inc. in New York

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,119,018 ($1.1M)

Contractor: Integrated Construction Enterprises Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-06-05

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,060 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TMCH PATIO RENOVATION

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10007

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $1.1 million to INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC for work described as: TMCH PATIO RENOVATION Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a renovation project of this scope. 2. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Project duration of 1060 days indicates a long-term commitment for the awarded contractor. 4. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $1.12 million for a patio renovation seems within a reasonable range for a project of this nature, especially considering it spans over 1000 days. Benchmarking against similar public building renovations would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, without specific details on the scope of work (e.g., materials, size, features), a definitive comparison is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be favorable for the government if managed effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, or the solicitation was not universally advertised. The number of bidders (3) is relatively low, which could suggest limited competition. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: A limited number of bidders may result in higher prices for taxpayers compared to a scenario with extensive, open competition. The government may not have secured the most cost-effective solution available in the market.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors to the facility in New York will benefit from improved outdoor amenities. The project will deliver renovation services for a patio area, enhancing the usability and aesthetics of the space. The geographic impact is localized to New York, where the facility is located. The contract supports jobs within the commercial and institutional building construction sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition (3 bidders) could lead to suboptimal pricing.
The 'after exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation into the rationale for excluding potential bidders.
Long project duration (1060 days) increases the risk of scope creep or unforeseen cost increases if not meticulously managed.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract type shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Awarded to a contractor with experience in commercial building construction.
Project aims to improve federal facilities, enhancing user experience.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically commercial and institutional building construction (NAICS 236220). The market for federal construction projects is substantial, with agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) managing numerous renovation and new build projects annually. Benchmarking this $1.12 million renovation against similar GSA patio or outdoor space projects would be ideal, but generally, projects of this scale require specialized contractors capable of managing complex logistics and adhering to federal building codes and standards.

Small Business Impact

The contract details indicate that small business participation was not a primary set-aside consideration (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the contract was not specifically targeted towards small businesses. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without this, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though larger prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized construction tasks.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Public Buildings Service. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Accountability measures would include adherence to the project schedule, quality standards, and contract specifications. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal contract databases, though detailed project progress reports may not be publicly available. The Inspector General for GSA would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

GSA Building Renovation Projects
Federal Public Works Construction
Commercial and Institutional Building Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Potential for cost escalation due to long duration
Ambiguity in 'Exclusion of Sources' clause

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $1.1 million to INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC. TMCH PATIO RENOVATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INTEGRATED CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-06-05. End: 2026-04-30.

What specific scope of work is included in the $1.12 million patio renovation?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the TMCH PATIO RENOVATION contract. Typically, such renovations could include demolition of existing structures, installation of new paving materials (e.g., concrete, pavers, wood decking), landscaping, installation of outdoor furniture, lighting, drainage systems, and potentially accessibility upgrades. The total contract value of $1,119,017.84 suggests a significant undertaking. To fully assess value for money, a detailed breakdown of materials, labor, and project phases would be necessary. Without this, comparisons are limited to general construction cost indices.

How does the number of bidders (3) compare to similar GSA patio renovation contracts?

The data indicates 3 bidders for this specific contract. Without access to a comprehensive database of GSA patio renovation contracts, a direct comparison is difficult. However, generally, for federal construction contracts, the number of bidders can vary significantly based on project complexity, geographic location, and market conditions. A competition with only 3 bidders might be considered moderate to low, depending on the specific solicitation and the number of potential qualified contractors in the New York area. A higher number of bidders typically suggests more robust competition and potentially better pricing for the government.

What are the potential risks associated with a 1060-day project duration?

A project duration of 1060 days (approximately 3 years) for a patio renovation presents several potential risks. These include increased likelihood of material cost escalation over time, potential for contractor resource reallocation to other projects, and a higher chance of encountering unforeseen site conditions or regulatory changes. Furthermore, extended project timelines can lead to 'scope creep,' where additional features or changes are requested, potentially increasing costs beyond the initial firm-fixed-price agreement if not managed strictly. Maintaining consistent oversight and communication throughout this extended period is crucial for successful project completion within budget and scope.

What does 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' imply for this contract?

The term 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' is somewhat contradictory and requires careful interpretation. It generally means that the solicitation was intended for full and open competition, but specific sources were excluded from consideration prior to the solicitation being issued. This exclusion must be justified by the agency, often based on factors like national security, specific technical requirements, or prior performance issues. While it aims for competition among the remaining eligible sources, it inherently limits the pool of potential bidders compared to unrestricted full and open competition, potentially impacting price discovery and the range of solutions considered.

What is the track record of Integrated Construction Enterprises Inc. with federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Integrated Construction Enterprises Inc. with federal contracts is not provided in the given data snippet. To assess their performance, one would need to consult federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) to review their past awards, contract values, performance ratings, and any history of disputes or terminations. A positive track record with similar construction projects would indicate a lower risk for this current contract. Conversely, a history of issues could raise concerns about their ability to deliver on time and within budget.

How does the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type benefit the government in this scenario?

The Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract type is generally advantageous for the government, especially for projects with well-defined scopes like a patio renovation. Under an FFP contract, the contractor agrees to a total price for a well-defined product or service. This shifts the risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. If the contractor's costs exceed the agreed-upon price, the government is not obligated to pay more. This provides cost certainty for the government and incentivizes the contractor to manage their costs efficiently and complete the work within the stipulated budget. However, FFP contracts often include higher initial prices to compensate contractors for taking on this risk.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PC0223R0027

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 259 STEPHENS ST, BELLEVILLE, NJ, 07109

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,119,018

Exercised Options: $1,119,018

Current Obligation: $1,119,018

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0220D0008

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline