GSA awards $30.5K BPA Call for lighting at Burlington Post Office and Courthouse to DAE SUNG LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,460 ($30.5K)

Contractor: DAE Sung LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-29

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 213 days

Daily Burn Rate: $143/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: LIGHTING REPLACEMENT AT THE BURLINGTON POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE IN BURLINGTON, VERMONT.

Place of Performance

Location: BURLINGTON, CHITTENDEN County, VERMONT, 05401

State: Vermont Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $30,459.51 to DAE SUNG LLC for work described as: LIGHTING REPLACEMENT AT THE BURLINGTON POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE IN BURLINGTON, VERMONT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 2. The fixed-price contract type suggests cost certainty for the government. 3. The contract duration of 213 days is relatively short, implying a focused scope of work. 4. The award to DAE SUNG LLC for facilities support services falls within a standard service category. 5. The contract value is modest, suggesting a localized or specific project rather than a large-scale initiative.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $30,459.51 for lighting replacement appears reasonable for a single federal building project. Without specific details on the scope of work (e.g., number of fixtures, type of lighting), a direct comparison to similar contracts is difficult. However, the use of a BPA Call suggests that pricing may have been benchmarked during the initial BPA establishment. The fixed-price nature of the award provides cost predictability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific mechanism used was a BPA Call, which is a task order against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. This implies that the initial BPA was competed, and this call represents a specific order placed against that agreement. The number of bidders for this specific call is not provided, but the initial BPA competition likely involved multiple offerors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers by encouraging a wider range of suppliers to bid.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and visitors of the Burlington Post Office and Courthouse in Vermont. The services delivered include the replacement of lighting systems, aiming to improve illumination, energy efficiency, and potentially reduce maintenance costs. The geographic impact is localized to Burlington, Vermont. Workforce implications are likely minimal, involving a small team for the installation and replacement of lighting fixtures.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed scope of work makes it difficult to assess if the price is truly competitive for the specific services rendered.
The specific performance metrics or quality standards for the lighting replacement are not detailed in the provided data.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
BPA Call mechanism implies a pre-vetted and potentially competitively established pricing framework.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector, specifically related to building maintenance and upgrades. The market for these services is broad, encompassing numerous small and large businesses. Federal spending in this area is consistent, as agencies continuously require maintenance and modernization of their physical infrastructure. This contract represents a small component of the overall federal spending on facilities management.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business set-aside was not utilized for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific benefits to the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The primary competition was full and open.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the General Services Administration's (GSA) Public Buildings Service, which manages federal real estate. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract type, requiring DAE SUNG LLC to complete the work as specified. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
General Services Administration Facilities Management
Post Office Infrastructure Upgrades
Courthouse Facility Services

Risk Flags

Limited scope detail
Lack of specific performance metrics

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $30,459.51 to DAE SUNG LLC. LIGHTING REPLACEMENT AT THE BURLINGTON POST OFFICE AND COURTHOUSE IN BURLINGTON, VERMONT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAE SUNG LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30,459.51.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-29. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the specific scope of work for the lighting replacement, and what types of fixtures are being installed?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the lighting replacement, nor does it specify the types of fixtures being installed. This information is crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. For instance, replacing basic fluorescent lights with energy-efficient LEDs would involve different costs and benefits than a more complex upgrade. Understanding the scope would allow for a more accurate comparison to industry benchmarks for similar projects, considering factors like the number of fixtures, square footage covered, and any associated electrical work required.

How does the per-unit cost of the lighting fixtures and installation compare to market rates for similar federal facilities?

Without specific details on the number and type of lighting fixtures, a precise per-unit cost comparison is not feasible. The total contract value of $30,459.51 for 213 days of work at the Burlington Post Office and Courthouse provides a general context. However, to benchmark effectively, we would need to know the quantity of fixtures replaced and the labor hours involved. Typically, GSA would have established rates or benchmarks for such services within their BPA framework. If this BPA Call's pricing deviates significantly from those internal benchmarks or publicly available cost data for similar government facilities, it could indicate a potential value concern.

What was the competitive landscape for the initial Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) against which this call was placed?

The data indicates that this contract was awarded via a BPA Call under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION'. This suggests that the initial BPA, against which this specific call was placed, was itself competed broadly. However, the number of bidders for the original BPA is not specified. A robust competition during the initial BPA establishment is generally positive for taxpayers, as it sets a foundation for competitive pricing on subsequent task orders. The effectiveness of this competition for this specific call depends on whether other BPA holders were solicited and if DAE SUNG LLC was the most advantageous offer.

What is the track record of DAE SUNG LLC in performing similar facilities support services for the federal government?

The provided data identifies DAE SUNG LLC as the contractor but does not offer details on their past performance or track record with the federal government. To assess risk and value, it would be beneficial to review their contract history, including past performance evaluations, any instances of contract disputes, or successful completion of similar lighting replacement projects. A contractor with a proven history of delivering quality services on time and within budget generally presents less risk and offers better assurance of value for taxpayer money.

Are there any specific performance metrics or quality standards associated with this lighting replacement contract?

The provided data does not specify any performance metrics or quality standards for this lighting replacement contract. While the contract is firm fixed-price, which implies a defined scope of deliverables, the absence of explicit performance metrics makes it challenging to objectively assess the quality of the work performed. Ideally, contracts of this nature would include measurable standards related to illumination levels, energy savings achieved, warranty periods for fixtures, and timely completion, allowing for better oversight and accountability.

How does this contract's value and duration compare to other similar lighting replacement projects managed by GSA's Public Buildings Service?

The contract value of $30,459.51 and a duration of 213 days are relatively modest for federal facilities projects. Without access to GSA's internal databases or more granular public contract data, a direct comparison is difficult. However, projects of this size often represent localized upgrades or replacements within a single building. Larger, multi-building, or agency-wide lighting modernization efforts would typically involve significantly higher dollar values and longer durations. The use of a BPA Call suggests this is a standard, perhaps recurring, type of service GSA procures.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ASR BTV 25-33

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 23808 W ANDREW RD, PLAINFIELD, IL, 60585

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,460

Exercised Options: $30,460

Current Obligation: $30,460

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0022A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline