GSA awards $8.4M contract for USMS security upgrades at Donahue F.O.B. to Henry General Contractors

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,397 ($8.4K)

Contractor: Henry General Contractors Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-08-04

End Date: 2025-12-04

Contract Duration: 122 days

Daily Burn Rate: $69/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: USMS SECURITY UPGRADE AT THE DONAHUE F.O.B

Place of Performance

Location: WORCESTER, WORCESTER County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01608

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,396.84 to HENRY GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC for work described as: USMS SECURITY UPGRADE AT THE DONAHUE F.O.B Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 3. Short performance period of 122 days indicates a focused project scope. 4. Contractor Henry General Contractors Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts. 5. The project falls under commercial and institutional building construction NAICS code. 6. Geographic location in Massachusetts may influence local labor and material costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8.4 million for security upgrades at a federal building appears reasonable given the scope of construction and security enhancements. Without specific details on the nature of the upgrades, direct comparison is challenging. However, for a project of this duration and type, the price point is within expected ranges for federal construction contracts. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government, mitigating the risk of cost overruns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, this method generally promotes a competitive environment, allowing the government to solicit proposals from a wide range of qualified contractors. This approach is designed to ensure fair pricing and access to the best available solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down prices and encouraging contractors to offer their best value propositions.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) personnel who will operate in a more secure facility. The contract will deliver enhanced security infrastructure at the Donahue Federal Office Building. The geographic impact is localized to the facility in Massachusetts where the Donahue F.O.B. is located. The project will likely involve local construction labor and potentially local material suppliers, providing economic stimulus.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the U.S. economy. Federal spending in this area supports the maintenance and modernization of government facilities nationwide. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other federal building renovation or construction projects, with costs varying based on size, complexity, and location. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of such services.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses is likely limited unless Henry General Contractors Inc. utilizes small business subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting plans and their adherence to small business utilization goals.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for construction contracts, including project management, site inspections, and contract close-out procedures. The Public Buildings Service (PBS) within GSA is responsible for managing federal building projects. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General oversight may be involved if performance issues or potential fraud are identified.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, general-services-administration, us-marshals-service, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, federal-building, security-upgrade, massachusetts, commercial-institutional-building-construction, delivery-order

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,396.84 to HENRY GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC. USMS SECURITY UPGRADE AT THE DONAHUE F.O.B

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HENRY GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,396.84.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-04. End: 2025-12-04.

What is the track record of Henry General Contractors Inc. with federal contracts, particularly with the GSA?

Henry General Contractors Inc. has a history of performing federal contracts, as indicated by its presence in federal procurement databases. While specific details on past performance with the GSA or similar security upgrade projects are not provided in this summary, the award of this contract suggests they met the qualification criteria set forth by the agency. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations, past performance on similar projects, and any history of disputes or contract terminations, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and capability for this specific security upgrade.

How does the $8.4 million cost compare to similar security upgrade projects at federal buildings?

Benchmarking the $8.4 million cost requires detailed comparison with similar security upgrade projects. Factors such as the size of the facility, the specific security technologies implemented (e.g., access control, surveillance, structural hardening), the duration of the project, and the prevailing labor and material costs in the project's geographic location (Massachusetts) are critical. Without these specifics, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a project of 122 days focused on security enhancements at a federal office building, this value appears within a reasonable range for federal construction procurement, assuming a moderate scope of work.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential delays in material or equipment delivery, unforeseen site conditions requiring scope adjustments, and ensuring the contractor meets the stringent security standards required by the U.S. Marshals Service. Mitigation strategies likely involve the firm fixed-price contract structure, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and timelines effectively. The GSA's oversight, including regular site inspections and progress reviews, will also play a crucial role in identifying and addressing issues proactively. The short performance period, while efficient, also necessitates tight project management to avoid schedule slippage.

What is the expected effectiveness of the security upgrades delivered under this contract?

The effectiveness of the security upgrades will depend on the specific nature of the enhancements undertaken. Assuming the contract addresses identified vulnerabilities and implements appropriate security measures, the upgrades are expected to improve the overall security posture of the Donahue F.O.B., enhancing the safety of personnel and the protection of sensitive information or assets. The U.S. Marshals Service, as the end-user, would have defined the requirements based on their operational needs and threat assessments, aiming to achieve a specific level of security enhancement.

What are the historical spending patterns for security upgrades at federal buildings managed by the GSA?

Historical spending patterns for security upgrades at federal buildings managed by the GSA are substantial and vary widely based on the size and age of the facility, the scope of the upgrades, and the specific security threats being addressed. GSA consistently invests in maintaining and modernizing its portfolio of federal buildings, which includes significant expenditures on security infrastructure. These investments are often driven by evolving security directives, threat assessments, and the need to comply with federal security standards. Analyzing past GSA contracts for similar projects would reveal trends in cost per square foot, technology adoption, and project durations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTYMAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQ1PS-25-0239

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 57 OBSERVER ST, SPRINGFIELD, MA, 01104

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,397

Exercised Options: $8,397

Current Obligation: $8,397

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0023D0020

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-08-04

Current End Date: 2025-12-04

Potential End Date: 2025-12-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

More Contracts from Henry General Contractors Inc

View all Henry General Contractors Inc federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending