VA awards $271K contract for Bakersfield leak repair to Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,145 ($27.1K)

Contractor: Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-04-10

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 81 days

Daily Burn Rate: $335/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BAKERSFIELD LEAK REPAIR

Place of Performance

Location: ARVIN, KERN County, CALIFORNIA, 93203

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $27,145 to HAMILTON PACIFIC CHAMBERLAIN LLC for work described as: BAKERSFIELD LEAK REPAIR Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 2. The contract duration of 81 days suggests a focused scope for leak repair services. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The award is a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction. 6. The contract is located in California, a significant market for construction and maintenance services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $271,450 for leak repair services over approximately 2.7 months appears reasonable for a specific geographic area. Benchmarking against similar VA contracts for localized building maintenance and repair would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific details on the scope of work and the extent of the leaks, a precise comparison is challenging. However, the fixed-price nature of the contract offers cost predictability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, or the initial exclusion was later lifted. The number of bids received (4) indicates a moderate level of competition. This suggests that the market for this specific type of repair in the Bakersfield area may have a limited number of qualified bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: A moderate number of bidders suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price, but there may be room for improvement in competition to drive prices lower.

Public Impact

Veterans in the Bakersfield area will benefit from improved facility conditions due to the leak repairs. Essential building maintenance services will be delivered to a Department of Veterans Affairs facility. The geographic impact is localized to Bakersfield, California. The contract supports the construction and maintenance workforce within the specified region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited competition due to specialized nature of leak repair in a specific geographic area.
Risk of cost overruns if unforeseen complexities arise beyond the initial scope of the leak repair.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to meet the fixed-price deadline without compromising quality.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Awarded to a single contractor, potentially streamlining project management.
Delivery Order structure may indicate efficient use of an existing contract vehicle.

Sector Analysis

The construction and maintenance sector is a significant area of federal spending. This contract falls under commercial and institutional building construction, a segment that includes repairs and upkeep of government facilities. Federal agencies frequently contract for such services to maintain operational readiness and ensure safe environments. Benchmarks for similar repair contracts vary widely based on scope, location, and urgency, but this award appears to be within a typical range for localized, specialized repair work.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain LLC, a single entity, does not directly address small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if this contract's scope could have been effectively fulfilled by small businesses or if subcontracting opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Veterans Affairs contracting officer and project managers. As a Delivery Order under a larger contract, existing oversight mechanisms for that vehicle would apply. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed performance metrics and inspection reports are typically internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Veterans Affairs Facility Maintenance Contracts
Commercial Building Repair Services
Federal Construction Delivery Orders

Risk Flags

Limited Competition
Potential for Unforeseen Conditions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $27,145 to HAMILTON PACIFIC CHAMBERLAIN LLC. BAKERSFIELD LEAK REPAIR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HAMILTON PACIFIC CHAMBERLAIN LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27,145.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain LLC with the Department of Veterans Affairs?

Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain LLC has been awarded federal contracts, including this one from the Department of Veterans Affairs. A comprehensive review of their past performance with the VA would involve examining contract histories, performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes on previous projects. Without access to detailed performance data beyond basic award information, it's difficult to definitively assess their track record. However, the award of this contract suggests they met the basic qualifications and requirements set forth by the VA for this specific service. Further investigation into their history with similar types of repair or construction projects would provide a more robust understanding of their capabilities and reliability.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar leak repair contracts awarded by the VA?

The $271,450 value for this leak repair contract is specific to the Bakersfield, California location and the defined scope of work over 81 days. Comparing it directly to 'similar' contracts requires careful consideration of numerous factors: the size and type of facility, the severity and complexity of the leaks, the materials and labor involved, and the prevailing market rates in different geographic regions. While this amount may seem substantial for leak repair, it could be justified if the scope involves significant structural issues or multiple complex leaks within a VA facility. A more precise comparison would involve analyzing VA contracts for building envelope repairs or specialized leak remediation in comparable facilities within California or similar cost-of-living areas. Without such granular data, this figure serves as a benchmark for this particular project.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific leak repair contract?

The primary risks associated with this leak repair contract include potential scope creep, where the extent of the leaks is greater than initially assessed, leading to increased costs or delays beyond the firm fixed price. There's also a risk related to unforeseen site conditions that could complicate the repair process. Contractor performance risk is another factor; ensuring Hamilton Pacific Chamberlain LLC has the necessary expertise and resources to complete the job efficiently and to the required standard is crucial. Furthermore, the short duration (81 days) presents a risk of rushed work if not managed effectively. Finally, the 'limited' competition aspect could imply a risk that the government did not secure the absolute lowest possible price due to a constrained bidder pool.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method for ensuring value?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method aims to balance broad competition with specific needs. It allows agencies to solicit bids from all responsible sources after potentially excluding certain categories or types of offerors based on predefined criteria (e.g., specific certifications, past performance limitations). While it's more competitive than a sole-source award, it's less competitive than unrestricted full and open competition. The effectiveness in ensuring value depends heavily on the justification for the exclusion. If the exclusion is narrowly tailored and genuinely necessary for the contract's success, it can still yield good value. However, if the exclusion is overly broad or not well-justified, it can limit the bidder pool, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation, thus diminishing the value for taxpayers. In this case, with 4 bidders, the competition appears moderate, suggesting reasonable value but perhaps not the maximum achievable.

What are the historical spending patterns for leak repair and building maintenance at this specific VA facility or in the Bakersfield area?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for leak repair and building maintenance at this specific VA facility or within the Bakersfield area is crucial for context. Without access to specific historical data for this facility, we can infer general trends. Federal agencies, particularly the VA, consistently allocate funds for facility maintenance and repair to ensure operational continuity and safety. Spending on leak repairs can fluctuate based on the age of the infrastructure, weather events, and preventative maintenance schedules. If this contract represents a significant increase or decrease compared to previous expenditures for similar work in the region, it warrants further investigation. Understanding these patterns helps in assessing whether the current award is an anomaly, a necessary investment, or potentially indicative of changing needs or market conditions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14 IRONGATE DR, WALDORF, MD, 20602

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,145

Exercised Options: $27,145

Current Obligation: $27,145

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C78626D0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline