VA awards $7M contract for strategic and facility planning to Concourse Federal Group LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $6,999,014 ($7.0M)
Contractor: Concourse Federal Group LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Start Date: 2025-09-28
End Date: 2026-09-27
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: EO14042 - STRATEGIC AND FACILITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90073
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $7.0 million to CONCOURSE FEDERAL GROUP LLC for work described as: EO14042 - STRATEGIC AND FACILITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of strategic and facility planning services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of one year with a potential for renewal indicates ongoing need. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The contractor has experience in federal contracting, though specific performance data is limited. 6. Geographic focus on California may indicate a specific regional need for these services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $6,999,014 for a one-year period seems aligned with typical federal contracts for strategic and facility planning. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facility management and real estate advisory services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure offers cost predictability. Without more detailed scope of work or performance history, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the initial figures do not raise immediate red flags.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that the solicitation was publicly advertised and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific details of the competition, such as the number of bids received and the evaluation process, are not provided in the summary data. However, the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competitive environment, which is favorable for price discovery and achieving fair market value.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions.
Public Impact
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is the primary beneficiary, receiving strategic and facility planning services. Services delivered are expected to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of VA facility management and strategic planning. The contract has a geographic focus on California, suggesting benefits for VA facilities and operations within that state. The contract supports the federal workforce involved in facility management and strategic planning within the VA.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited public information on contractor's specific past performance on similar large-scale federal contracts.
- Scope of work details are not fully elaborated in the provided data, making it difficult to assess potential risks.
- The contract's success hinges on the contractor's ability to deliver actionable strategic insights and effective facility management plans.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
- Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.
- The contract duration allows for sustained strategic planning and facility management support.
- The contractor, Concourse Federal Group LLC, is an established entity in the federal contracting space.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically focusing on real estate and facility management advisory services. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 531390 ('Other Activities Related to Real Estate') encompasses a range of services including property management, real estate consulting, and facility support. Federal spending in this area is crucial for optimizing the vast real estate portfolios managed by agencies like the VA, ensuring efficient operations and strategic alignment with agency missions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader government-wide analyses of professional services procurement.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The focus on full and open competition suggests that large and small businesses alike were eligible to bid. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small business participation would likely be through prime contracting if they were successful bidders, or potentially through subcontracting if the prime contractor voluntarily includes them in their team, though this is not mandated by the contract type.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the contracting agency, the Department of Veterans Affairs. Specific oversight mechanisms are not detailed in the provided data but typically include contract administration, performance monitoring, and regular reporting requirements. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, which incentivizes the contractor to meet defined deliverables within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- VA Facility Management Services
- Federal Real Estate Advisory Contracts
- Strategic Planning Services for Government Agencies
- Professional Services Procurement by VA
Risk Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
- Dependence on contractor's expertise for critical planning functions.
- Limited visibility into specific past performance details.
Tags
professional-services, facility-planning, strategic-planning, department-of-veterans-affairs, va, california, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, real-estate-services, >$1m, 1-year-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $7.0 million to CONCOURSE FEDERAL GROUP LLC. EO14042 - STRATEGIC AND FACILITY PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CONCOURSE FEDERAL GROUP LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-28. End: 2026-09-27.
What is the track record of Concourse Federal Group LLC in delivering similar strategic and facility planning services to the federal government?
Concourse Federal Group LLC has a history of performing federal contracts, including those related to facility support and management. However, detailed public records specifically outlining their performance on large-scale strategic and facility planning contracts comparable to this VA award are limited. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance evaluations (if available through federal databases like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and client testimonials would be necessary to fully assess their track record. Their experience in areas like real estate services and general consulting suggests a foundational capability, but the specific expertise for complex strategic planning within the VA's unique operational context requires further verification.
How does the awarded amount of approximately $7 million for a one-year contract compare to similar federal contracts for strategic and facility planning services?
The awarded amount of $6,999,014 for a one-year contract for strategic and facility planning services appears to be within a reasonable range for federal procurements of this nature, especially considering the scale and complexity often associated with the Department of Veterans Affairs' infrastructure. Benchmarking against similar contracts awarded by other federal agencies for facility management, real estate consulting, and strategic planning would provide a more precise comparison. Factors such as the specific deliverables, geographic scope (in this case, California), and the level of expertise required significantly influence pricing. Without access to a detailed scope of work and a comprehensive market analysis of comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents exceptional value, but it does not immediately suggest overpricing.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics that will be used to evaluate the success of this contract. Typically, for strategic and facility planning services, KPIs might include the timely delivery of strategic plans, the accuracy and feasibility of facility assessments, cost savings identified or achieved through planning recommendations, adherence to budget and schedule for planning deliverables, and client satisfaction. The contracting officer's representative (COR) at the VA would be responsible for monitoring the contractor's performance against the contract's requirements and any established KPIs. A thorough review of the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) would reveal the specific performance standards and evaluation criteria.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the VA's ability to manage its facilities and execute its strategic goals?
This contract is intended to directly support the VA's ability to manage its facilities and execute its strategic goals by providing expert analysis and planning services. Effective strategic and facility planning can lead to optimized resource allocation, improved operational efficiency, better utilization of existing infrastructure, and informed decision-making regarding future investments or divestitures. For the VA, this could translate into more cost-effective facility operations, enhanced support for healthcare delivery, and better alignment of its physical assets with its long-term mission objectives. The focus on California suggests a targeted effort to address specific planning needs within that region's VA facilities.
Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Potential risks associated with this contract could include the contractor's ability to deliver high-quality, actionable strategic recommendations, potential cost overruns if the scope expands beyond initial estimates (though mitigated by the fixed-price structure), and challenges in integrating the contractor's plans with existing VA processes and personnel. Mitigation strategies are typically embedded within the contract's terms and oversight. The firm-fixed-price nature helps control costs. The VA's contract administration and COR will monitor performance closely. Furthermore, the requirement for full and open competition aims to select a capable contractor, reducing performance risk. Specific risk mitigation plans would be detailed in the contract's SOW and associated management documents.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Real Estate and Rental and Leasing › Activities Related to Real Estate › Other Activities Related to Real Estate
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1001 CONNECTICUT AVE NW SUITE 704, WASHINGTON, DC, 20036
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,999,014
Exercised Options: $6,999,014
Current Obligation: $6,999,014
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 36C26219D0065
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-28
Current End Date: 2026-09-27
Potential End Date: 2026-09-27 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-23
More Contracts from Concourse Federal Group LLC
- EO14042 - Strategic and Facility Planning and Management Services — $9.5M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- EO14042 - Strategic and Facility Planning and Management Services — $6.2M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- EO14042 - Strategic and Facility Planning and Management Services — $5.3M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Activation Services for NEW the NEW Long Beach Inpatient and Outpatient Mental Health Facility and the Community Living Center — $3.4M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Initial Outfitting Transition and Activation (iot&a) Services for the VA SAN Diego Healthcare System Spinal Cord Injury/Community Living Center — $2.8M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts
- CCN Region 3 Express Report — $5.2B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Express Report for FY22 Region 2 — $5.1B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Fiscal Year 2022 Express Report for Region 1 — $4.2B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Express Report for the Patient Centered Community Care (PC3) Contract — $3.3B (Triwest Healthcare Alliance Corp)
- CCN Region Three FY21 Express Report — $3.1B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)