VA awards $33.6M construction contract for Roseburg HCS, exercising option 2

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $33,652 ($33.7K)

Contractor: PVH Construction LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-05-04

End Date: 2026-06-18

Contract Duration: 45 days

Daily Burn Rate: $748/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE ROSEBURG HCS IN ROSEBURG, OR. EXERCISE OPTION 2. UPDATE CLAUSES

Place of Performance

Location: ROSEBURG, DOUGLAS County, OREGON, 97471

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $33,652.43 to PVH CONSTRUCTION LLC for work described as: INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE ROSEBURG HCS IN ROSEBURG, OR. EXERCISE OPTION 2. UPDATE CLAUSES Key points: 1. Contract focuses on construction services, indicating a need for facility upgrades or maintenance. 2. The award is a single-award task order, suggesting a specific project scope rather than broad service needs. 3. The contract duration is relatively short (45 days), implying a focused scope of work. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which transfers risk to the contractor. 5. The agency is the Department of Veterans Affairs, highlighting investment in healthcare infrastructure for veterans. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $33.6 million for a 45-day construction task order appears substantial. Benchmarking this against similar construction projects for healthcare facilities would be necessary for a precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor has committed to a specific price, which can be advantageous for the government if the scope is well-defined and the contractor's bid is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This indicates that while the competition was initially broad, certain sources were excluded, which warrants further investigation into the rationale behind the exclusion. The specific number of bidders is not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally aims to achieve competitive pricing. However, the exclusion of sources could potentially limit the number of competitive bids received, which might impact the final price achieved for taxpayers.

Public Impact

Veterans receiving services at the Roseburg Health Care System (HCS) will benefit from improved or maintained facilities. The contract delivers essential construction services, likely related to infrastructure upgrades or repairs at the facility. The geographic impact is localized to Roseburg, Oregon, directly benefiting the local community and veteran population there. The contract supports the construction workforce in Oregon, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in the skilled trades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The exclusion of sources in a 'full and open' competition needs clarification to ensure no potential bidders were unfairly disadvantaged.
The specific nature of the construction work is not detailed, which could lead to scope creep or change orders if not precisely defined.
The relatively high dollar amount for a short duration task order may warrant scrutiny to ensure efficient use of funds.

Positive Signals

The use of a Firm Fixed Price contract transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
The Department of Veterans Affairs is investing in its healthcare infrastructure, which is a positive signal for veteran care.
The contract was awarded after a competitive process, suggesting an effort to secure a reasonable price.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220). This sector is a significant part of the broader construction industry, encompassing the building of non-residential structures like hospitals, government buildings, and commercial offices. Spending in this sector is often driven by government investments in public infrastructure and facilities, as well as private sector development. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or cost per project for similar healthcare construction projects across different federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a stated requirement or outcome for this specific contract. There is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting plans. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best offer from the available pool of contractors, without a specific mandate to engage small businesses for this particular task order.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, which obligates the contractor to complete the work for the agreed-upon price. Transparency would be enhanced by public contract databases and the VA's Inspector General's office, which can investigate waste, fraud, and abuse in federal contracts.

Related Government Programs

VA Medical Facility Construction
Federal Building Construction Contracts
Construction Services for Government Institutions
Task Order Contracts
Infrastructure Modernization Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep due to short duration and high value.
Lack of detail on specific construction services.
Rationale for source exclusion in competition needs clarification.
Limited information on the number of bidders.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $33,652.43 to PVH CONSTRUCTION LLC. INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE ROSEBURG HCS IN ROSEBURG, OR. EXERCISE OPTION 2. UPDATE CLAUSES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PVH CONSTRUCTION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $33,652.43.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-05-04. End: 2026-06-18.

What specific construction services are being procured under this task order, and how do they align with the needs of the Roseburg HCS?

The provided data describes this as an 'INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY SINGLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AT THE ROSEBURG HCS IN ROSEBURG, OR.' While the specific services are not detailed, the NAICS code 236220 (Commercial and Institutional Building Construction) suggests the work could involve general construction, renovation, repair, or maintenance of the healthcare facility. The exercise of 'Option 2' implies that this task order is part of a larger IDIQ contract, and the services are likely defined within the base contract's scope. To understand the alignment with HCS needs, one would need to review the original contract statement of work and any modifications or task order directives.

How does the $33.6 million cost compare to similar construction projects for VA healthcare facilities of comparable size and scope?

A direct comparison of the $33.6 million cost requires detailed project specifications, square footage, and the specific types of construction (e.g., new build, renovation, specialized medical equipment installation). However, for a 45-day task order, this amount is substantial. Benchmarking would involve researching recent VA construction contracts for similar facilities, looking at metrics like cost per square foot, cost per bed, or cost per specific system upgrade. Without access to detailed project scope and comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or questionable value. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government sought price certainty.

What is the rationale behind the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' and how many bidders were considered?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' implies that the solicitation was initially intended for all responsible sources, but specific entities were subsequently excluded from consideration. The reasons for exclusion could range from failure to meet minimum qualifications, past performance issues, or specific regulatory requirements. The data does not specify the number of bidders that participated or were excluded. Understanding the specific reasons for exclusion and the number of actual bidders is crucial to assess whether the competition was robust enough to ensure fair pricing and prevent potential collusion or lack of innovation.

What are the potential risks associated with a 45-day construction task order valued at $33.6 million, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

A significant risk with a high-value, short-duration task order is the potential for poorly defined scope leading to change orders that increase costs and extend timelines beyond the initial 45 days. Another risk is the contractor's ability to mobilize resources and complete complex construction within such a compressed timeframe. Mitigation strategies typically include rigorous pre-award review of the contractor's proposal, detailed technical specifications, clear performance metrics, and active project management oversight during execution. The firm-fixed-price contract itself mitigates cost overrun risk for the government, provided the scope is accurately defined and managed.

What is the historical spending pattern for construction services at the Roseburg HCS or similar VA facilities?

Historical spending data for construction at the Roseburg HCS or similar VA facilities would provide context for the current $33.6 million award. Analyzing past contracts, including their values, durations, types of work, and competition levels, can reveal trends in facility maintenance, upgrades, and expansion. For instance, consistent high-value awards might indicate ongoing infrastructure needs or a pattern of significant capital investment. Conversely, sporadic or smaller awards might suggest routine maintenance. Without access to this historical data, it's challenging to determine if this contract represents a typical investment or an anomaly.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 15825 NE SPRINGBROOK RD, NEWBERG, OR, 97132

Business Categories: Category Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $33,652

Exercised Options: $33,652

Current Obligation: $33,652

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36C26022D0007

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline