DOJ awards $8.16M contract to ICF for administrative management consulting, with 4 bids received

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,163,379 ($8.2M)

Contractor: ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2023-05-24

End Date: 2026-05-01

Contract Duration: 1,073 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COLLECTIVE FOR THE USDOJ/OJP/OVC - TASK ORDER AWARD TO ICF, INC.

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $8.2 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. for work described as: TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COLLECTIVE FOR THE USDOJ/OJP/OVC - TASK ORDER AWARD TO ICF, INC. Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can pose cost control risks if not managed closely. 3. ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. is the awardee, a known entity in government contracting. 4. The contract duration is over 3 years, indicating a need for sustained support. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to general management consulting services. 6. The award is a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle, suggesting it's part of a broader framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $8.16 million over approximately 3 years for administrative management consulting appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services within the Department of Justice or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates careful monitoring to ensure costs remain within expected parameters and do not escalate due to inefficiencies or scope creep. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the competitive award suggests a baseline level of fair pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Four bids were received, which suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific task order. While four bidders is not exceptionally high, it does provide a basis for price comparison and indicates that the government did not limit the pool of potential contractors unnecessarily. The competition level is sufficient to provide some assurance of fair market pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by allowing multiple companies to bid, driving down costs through competitive pressure. The receipt of four bids suggests that the government received a reasonable range of pricing options.

Public Impact

The Office of Justice Programs (OJP) within the Department of Justice is the primary beneficiary, receiving administrative management and general management consulting services. These services are expected to support the operational efficiency and effectiveness of OJP programs. The contract is geographically located in Virginia, where ICF is based, but the impact could be nationwide through OJP's programs. The contract supports a professional services workforce, likely involving consultants and administrative support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative and general management consulting. This is a significant sector for federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of providing expertise. The DOJ's spending in this area is consistent with the need for specialized support to manage complex justice programs and initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary awardee is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether ICF utilizes small business subcontractors, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside within the Department of Justice, specifically the Office of Justice Programs. As a Delivery Order under a larger contract, the underlying contract vehicle likely has established oversight mechanisms. The Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates robust monitoring of labor hours and costs to ensure accountability and prevent overspending. Transparency would be enhanced through regular reporting requirements and performance reviews.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-justice, office-of-justice-programs, administrative-management-consulting, icf-incorporated-llc, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, professional-services, federal-contract, virginia

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $8.2 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C.. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COLLECTIVE FOR THE USDOJ/OJP/OVC - TASK ORDER AWARD TO ICF, INC.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Office of Justice Programs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-05-24. End: 2026-05-01.

What is ICF's track record with the Department of Justice and similar agencies?

ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. has a substantial history of contracting with the Department of Justice and other federal agencies, providing a range of services including management consulting, technical assistance, and program support. Their experience often spans areas related to justice, public safety, and health and human services. A review of federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their past performance, including contract values, performance ratings, and any past performance issues. This specific award suggests continued confidence in ICF's capabilities by the DOJ/OJP. Their established presence indicates a familiarity with government contracting processes and regulatory environments, which can be a positive signal for performance but also warrants scrutiny to ensure competitive pricing and innovation.

How does the $8.16 million value compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts?

The $8.16 million value for approximately three years of administrative management consulting services is within a typical range for federal contracts of this nature, especially those supporting specific program offices like the DOJ's Office of Justice Programs. Benchmarking against contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541611) awarded to large businesses by agencies of comparable size and mission (e.g., other components of the Department of Justice, Department of Homeland Security, or HHS) would provide a more precise comparison. Factors such as the specific tasks, required expertise, and duration influence the overall value. The fact that this was awarded under full and open competition with four bids suggests the pricing was deemed fair relative to the market at the time of award.

What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract of this size?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract, such as this $8.16 million award, is the potential for cost overruns if not managed diligently. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts pay the contractor for the actual time and materials used. This can incentivize longer task durations or less efficient work if oversight is weak. For the government, risks include difficulty in predicting the final cost, potential for scope creep where tasks expand without formal modification, and the need for robust monitoring of labor hours, rates, and material costs. To mitigate these risks, the DOJ/OJP must implement strong project management, conduct regular audits of timesheets and invoices, and clearly define task objectives and performance expectations.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring value for money for administrative consulting services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for money in federal procurement, including for administrative consulting services. By allowing all responsible sources to compete, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages contractors to offer their best value solutions. The receipt of four bids in this case indicates a reasonable level of competition, providing a basis for comparing proposals and pricing. While competition is a strong indicator of potential value, it's not a guarantee. The government must still conduct thorough evaluations of technical approach, past performance, and price to ensure the selected contractor offers the best overall value. Effective source selection and contract administration remain critical.

What is the historical spending trend for administrative management consulting services at DOJ/OJP?

Analyzing historical spending trends for administrative management consulting services at the DOJ/OJP requires access to detailed historical contract data. Generally, federal agencies like the DOJ utilize management consulting services to improve operational efficiency, implement new programs, conduct policy analysis, and provide technical assistance. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on agency priorities, budget allocations, and the initiation of new projects or initiatives. The $8.16 million award to ICF represents a specific investment in these services for a defined period. Understanding broader trends would involve examining annual spending reports, contract databases (like FPDS or USASpending), and agency budget justifications over several fiscal years to identify patterns, significant increases or decreases, and the primary drivers of such changes.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 15PVCD23Q00000001

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: ICF International, Inc.

Address: 1902 RESTON METRO PLAZA, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,093,535

Exercised Options: $8,163,379

Current Obligation: $8,163,379

Actual Outlays: $6,409,344

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $630,600

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F010CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-05-24

Current End Date: 2026-05-01

Potential End Date: 2028-05-01 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-04

More Contracts from ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.

View all ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending