DOJ awards $12.3M for Victim Services Training, with ICF Inc. as prime contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,272,614 ($12.3M)

Contractor: ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2023-03-31

End Date: 2026-05-01

Contract Duration: 1,127 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: VICTIM SERVICES TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $12.3 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C. for work described as: VICTIM SERVICES TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable given the scope of training and technical assistance. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Potential risks include performance variability and adherence to delivery schedules. 4. This contract supports critical victim services, aligning with DOJ's mission. 5. The administrative management consulting sector sees significant federal investment. 6. Contract duration of nearly three years allows for sustained support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.3 million for victim services training and technical assistance appears to be within a reasonable range for a multi-year federal contract of this nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts for training and consulting services indicates that the pricing structure, likely based on time and materials, is a common approach. While specific per-unit cost data is not provided, the overall award amount suggests a commitment to comprehensive support for victim services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of two bids suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific requirement. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more aggressive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, but two bidders still provide a basis for price discovery and selection.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service quality, ensuring federal funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

Victim service providers nationwide will benefit from enhanced training and technical assistance. The contract will deliver improved capacity for organizations supporting victims of crime. Geographic impact is national, reaching various communities across the United States. Workforce implications include professional development for individuals working in victim services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The administrative management and general management consulting services sector (NAICS 541611) is a significant area of federal spending, encompassing a wide range of advisory and support functions. Federal agencies frequently contract for these services to improve operational efficiency, implement new programs, and provide specialized expertise. This contract fits within the broader trend of federal agencies seeking external support for program management and capacity building, particularly in sensitive areas like victim services.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The prime contractor, ICF Incorporated, L.L.C., is a large business. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this contract are likely limited to potential subcontracting roles, which are not explicitly detailed here. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore indirect, relying on the prime contractor's subcontracting decisions.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Office of Justice Programs within the Department of Justice, with specific contract officers and program managers responsible for monitoring performance and expenditures. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases. Accountability measures would typically involve performance reviews, milestone tracking, and adherence to the terms of the delivery order. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-justice, office-of-justice-programs, victim-services, training, technical-assistance, administrative-management-consulting, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, time-and-materials, icf-incorporated, virginia, federal-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $12.3 million to ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C.. VICTIM SERVICES TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ICF INCORPORATED, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Office of Justice Programs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-03-31. End: 2026-05-01.

What is ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Justice?

ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. has a substantial history of federal contracting across various agencies, including the Department of Justice. They have been awarded numerous contracts for services ranging from program management and technical assistance to research and data analysis. Their experience often involves supporting public health, social services, and environmental initiatives. Within the DOJ, ICF has previously been involved in projects related to criminal justice, victim services, and grant administration. A review of federal procurement data indicates a consistent pattern of awards, suggesting a generally positive performance history, though specific contract details and performance metrics would require deeper analysis of individual contract close-outs and performance evaluations.

How does the $12.3 million award compare to similar victim services training and technical assistance contracts?

The $12.3 million award for victim services training and technical assistance is a significant but not unprecedented figure for a multi-year federal contract. Similar contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for large-scale training and capacity-building initiatives can range from several million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope, duration, and complexity. The 'time and materials' pricing structure, common in such contracts, allows for flexibility but requires diligent oversight to manage costs. Without specific details on the number of individuals to be trained, the breadth of technical assistance, and the duration of support, a precise comparison is difficult, but the award appears aligned with the scale of comprehensive national support typically required for victim services.

What are the primary risks associated with this 'Time and Materials' contract type?

The primary risks associated with a 'Time and Materials' (T&M) contract type, such as this one, revolve around cost control and contractor efficiency. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts do not have a ceiling on the total cost, making them susceptible to cost overruns if not managed meticulously. The government bears the risk of increased costs due to inefficiencies or scope creep by the contractor. Key risks include: 1) Unpredictable final cost: The total expenditure can exceed initial estimates if labor hours or material costs escalate. 2) Contractor inefficiency: Without a fixed price incentive, there's less pressure on the contractor to optimize resource utilization. 3) Scope creep: T&M contracts can inadvertently encourage the expansion of work beyond the original intent if not carefully monitored. To mitigate these risks, robust government oversight, detailed tracking of labor hours and materials, and clear performance metrics are essential.

What is the expected effectiveness of the training and technical assistance provided under this contract?

The expected effectiveness of the training and technical assistance hinges on several factors, including the quality of the curriculum developed by ICF, the expertise of the trainers and technical advisors, and the engagement of the victim service providers receiving the support. The contract aims to enhance the capacity of organizations to better serve victims of crime, implying improvements in service delivery, case management, and victim advocacy. Success will be measured by the extent to which these enhanced capabilities translate into tangible benefits for crime victims, such as improved access to resources, more sensitive and effective support, and better navigation of the justice system. The Office of Justice Programs' oversight and evaluation of the program's outcomes will be critical in determining its ultimate effectiveness.

How has federal spending on victim services training and technical assistance evolved over the past five years?

Federal spending on victim services training and technical assistance has generally seen a steady increase over the past five years, driven by a bipartisan recognition of the importance of supporting victims of crime and enhancing the capacity of service providers. Agencies like the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are primary sources of this funding. While specific aggregate data for 'training and technical assistance' within victim services can be complex to isolate, overall federal outlays for victim assistance programs have trended upwards. This growth reflects an expanding understanding of victim needs, evolving best practices in victim support, and the continuous effort to professionalize the victim services field through enhanced training and expert guidance. The $12.3 million award to ICF is indicative of this ongoing investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 15PVCD23Q00000001

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: ICF International, Inc.

Address: 1902 RESTON METRO PLAZA, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,774,997

Exercised Options: $12,386,299

Current Obligation: $12,272,614

Actual Outlays: $10,037,923

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 9

Total Subaward Amount: $1,401,139

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F010CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-03-31

Current End Date: 2026-05-01

Potential End Date: 2028-03-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-19

More Contracts from ICF Incorporated, L.L.C.

View all ICF Incorporated, L.L.C. federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending