DOJ awards $30.1M contract for computer systems design services to Innovative Management Concepts, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,159,355 ($30.2M)

Contractor: Innovative Management Concepts, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2021-09-03

End Date: 2026-09-02

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: BUSINESS CASE & BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS PARENT CLAUSES IN IMC'S VETS 2 CONTRACT (QTA0016AWA0001) ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED PRICING IS IAW REVISED QUOTE DATED: 08/06/2021 GOV POC: JAMES BROWN EMAIL: JAMES.BROWN9@USDOJ.GOV PHONE:703-740-0856

Place of Performance

Location: STERLING, LOUDOUN County, VIRGINIA, 20166

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $30.2 million to INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC for work described as: BUSINESS CASE & BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS PARENT CLAUSES IN IMC'S VETS 2 CONTRACT (QTA0016AWA0001) ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED PRICING IS IAW REVISED QUOTE DATED: 08/06/2021 GOV POC: JAMES BROWN EMAIL: JAMES.BROWN9@USDOJ.GOV PHONE:703-740-0856 Key points: 1. Contract focuses on business case and process analysis for the U.S. Marshals Service. 2. Pricing is based on a revised quote from August 2021. 3. The contract duration is five years, ending in September 2026. 4. This is a delivery order under a larger contract. 5. The award was made through full and open competition after exclusion of sources.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award amount is $30.1 million over five years. Benchmarking this against similar Computer Systems Design Services contracts requires more detailed service descriptions and performance metrics. Without specific deliverables or labor hour rates, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the five-year duration suggests a need for ongoing support in business case and process analysis.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This indicates that while the competition was open, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria, which warrants further investigation. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to fully assess the level of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging a wider range of offers and potentially driving down prices. However, the 'exclusion of sources' clause needs clarification to ensure maximum competition was achieved.

Public Impact

The U.S. Marshals Service will benefit from improved business case and process analysis. Services delivered include design and implementation of computer systems. The contract is geographically located in Virginia. The contract is structured as a delivery order, implying it fulfills specific needs within a broader framework.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess contractor performance.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause in the competition type requires further scrutiny to ensure fair market access.
Limited information on the number of bidders hinders a complete understanding of competitive dynamics.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a broad market search.
Long-term contract (5 years) indicates a stable, ongoing need for these services.
The contract is a delivery order, suggesting it's part of a larger, potentially strategic acquisition.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a significant segment of the IT industry. This sector encompasses a wide range of services, from custom software development to IT consulting and systems integration. The market size for such services is substantial, driven by government and commercial entities seeking to modernize operations and improve efficiency through technology. This specific contract addresses the need for analytical and design services related to business processes within a law enforcement agency.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, Innovative Management Concepts, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Marshals Service and the Department of Justice. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance data may be less accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would likely extend to this contract as part of the DOJ's overall oversight responsibilities.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice IT Services
U.S. Marshals Service Technology Modernization
Computer Systems Design Services Contracts
Business Process Analysis Services
Federal IT Consulting

Risk Flags

Competition clause requires clarification
Lack of detailed performance metrics
Limited public information on specific deliverables

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $30.2 million to INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC. BUSINESS CASE & BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS PARENT CLAUSES IN IMC'S VETS 2 CONTRACT (QTA0016AWA0001) ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED PRICING IS IAW REVISED QUOTE DATED: 08/06/2021 GOV POC: JAMES BROWN EMAIL: JAMES.BROWN9@USDOJ.GOV PHONE:703-740-0856

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-03. End: 2026-09-02.

What specific business cases and processes are being analyzed under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the exact business cases or processes that Innovative Management Concepts, Inc. is analyzing. The contract mentions 'BUSINESS CASE & BUSINESS PROCESS ANALYSIS PARENT CLAUSES IN IMC'S VETS 2 CONTRACT (QTA0016AWA0001)'. This suggests the services are related to evaluating and improving the operational workflows and strategic justifications for various initiatives within the U.S. Marshals Service. Further details would likely be found in the SOW (Statement of Work) or PWS (Performance Work Statement) associated with the delivery order, which are not included in the provided data. Understanding these specifics is crucial for assessing the contract's impact and value.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar government contracts for computer systems design services?

A direct pricing comparison is difficult without detailed breakdowns of labor categories, hours, and rates, or specific deliverables. The total award of $30.1 million over five years averages to $6.02 million per year. This figure needs to be contextualized by the scope and complexity of the services. For instance, contracts involving complex system integration or large-scale software development would command higher prices than those focused purely on analysis and design. Benchmarking would require access to similar contracts' SOWs and pricing structures, ideally from the same agency or for comparable tasks, to determine if this contract represents good value for money.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or details on how Innovative Management Concepts, Inc.'s performance is being measured. Typically, contracts for computer systems design services would include metrics related to the quality of analysis, timeliness of deliverables, accuracy of process mapping, and effectiveness of proposed solutions. Performance is usually assessed through regular progress reports, client feedback, and adherence to contract milestones. Without these details, it's challenging to evaluate the contractor's effectiveness and the overall success of the contract in achieving its objectives.

What is the significance of 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' for this contract?

The term 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' is somewhat contradictory. 'Full and open competition' implies that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. However, 'after exclusion of sources' suggests that certain potential bidders were disqualified or not considered prior to the competition phase, possibly due to specific requirements or pre-qualification criteria. This could limit the breadth of competition compared to a standard full and open process. Understanding the rationale behind the exclusion is key to determining if it was justified and if it potentially impacted the final price and innovation achieved.

What is the track record of Innovative Management Concepts, Inc. with similar government contracts?

Information on the specific track record of Innovative Management Concepts, Inc. with similar government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their past performance, one would typically look at contract history databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) for previous awards, contract values, performance ratings (e.g., CPARS), and any past performance issues or successes. Their experience with the U.S. Marshals Service or the Department of Justice, particularly in areas of business case and process analysis, would be highly relevant. A strong track record suggests a lower risk of performance issues.

How does this contract's spending compare to historical spending on similar services by the U.S. Marshals Service?

The provided data does not offer historical spending figures for the U.S. Marshals Service on similar computer systems design or business process analysis services. To make such a comparison, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded by the agency for comparable services over several fiscal years. This would involve identifying similar contract vehicles, their values, durations, and scopes of work. Comparing the current $30.1 million, five-year contract against this historical baseline would help determine if current spending is consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether it reflects market trends or specific program needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 15M10421QA4700007

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 428 HONAKER RD, BLAIRSVILLE, GA, 30512

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $52,925,602

Exercised Options: $30,159,355

Current Obligation: $30,159,355

Actual Outlays: $14,171,503

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 4

Total Subaward Amount: $23,561,379

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCH18D0028

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline