DOJ's FBI awards $26.7M for security systems support, raising questions on value and competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,704,511 ($26.7M)

Contractor: Chenega Integrated Security Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2019-06-08

End Date: 2025-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,064 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: SECD SUPPORT SERVICES - BPA CALL 2

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99503

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $26.7 million to CHENEGA INTEGRATED SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: SECD SUPPORT SERVICES - BPA CALL 2 Key points: 1. Contract value of $26.7M over 5 years. 2. Competition method is 'Full and Open', but specific award mechanism is BPA Call. 3. Risk flags include potential for cost overruns and limited transparency in BPA call awards. 4. Sector is Security Systems Services, a niche but essential government function.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract is awarded via a BPA Call, making direct pricing comparisons difficult without knowing the underlying BPA terms. The labor hour pricing structure can lead to cost variability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

While the initial BPA was likely competed full and open, individual call awards can sometimes lack the same level of price discovery as a standalone competitive procurement. This method can streamline acquisition but may not always yield the lowest price.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for essential security services. The effectiveness of the competition method will determine the overall value for money.

Public Impact

Ensures critical security infrastructure for the FBI remains operational. Supports national security by maintaining secure facilities. Potential for cost efficiencies if managed well under the BPA call structure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
Potential for scope creep in labor hour contracts.
Limited visibility into the specific services rendered under the BPA call.

Positive Signals

Essential service for a critical agency.
Utilizes a pre-competed BPA, potentially saving administrative time.
Long-term contract provides stability for security operations.

Sector Analysis

The Security Systems Services sector (NAICS 561621) encompasses a range of services from installation to maintenance of security systems. Government spending in this area is consistent, driven by national security and facility protection needs.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Chenega Integrated Security Solutions, LLC. Information on whether this prime contractor utilizes small businesses in its subcontracting plan is not provided.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is crucial for labor hour contracts awarded via BPA calls to ensure adherence to scope and prevent cost overruns. The FBI's internal procurement and program management offices are responsible for this oversight.

Related Government Programs

Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths)
Department of Justice Contracting
Federal Bureau of Investigation Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to labor hour contract type.
Limited transparency in BPA call award pricing.
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
No indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $26.7 million to CHENEGA INTEGRATED SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLC. SECD SUPPORT SERVICES - BPA CALL 2

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHENEGA INTEGRATED SECURITY SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-06-08. End: 2025-01-31.

What is the average hourly rate compared to market benchmarks for similar security system services?

Without access to the specific labor categories and rates within the BPA call, a direct comparison is challenging. Market benchmarks for security system technicians and project managers vary by region and experience. A thorough analysis would require comparing the contracted rates against industry surveys and other government contracts for comparable services to assess if the pricing is competitive and reflects fair market value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being measured?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or the performance measurement methodology for this contract. Effective oversight requires clearly defined KPIs related to response times, system uptime, maintenance quality, and adherence to security protocols. Regular performance reviews against these metrics are essential to ensure the contractor is meeting requirements and delivering value.

How does the BPA call mechanism ensure cost-effectiveness compared to a traditional competitive solicitation for these services?

BPA calls can offer cost-effectiveness through streamlined acquisition processes and potentially leveraging pre-negotiated rates from the parent BPA. However, true cost-effectiveness depends on the initial competition for the BPA and diligent management of each call to ensure fair pricing and prevent scope creep. Without transparency into the BPA's original terms and the specific call's pricing, it's difficult to definitively assess its cost-effectiveness against other methods.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Investigation and Security Services › Security Systems Services (except Locksmiths)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14420 ALBEMARLE POINT PL STE 100, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $36,180,383

Exercised Options: $35,468,793

Current Obligation: $26,704,511

Actual Outlays: $25,373,195

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $3,150,336

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15F06718A0003001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline