DO for Medical Services to Federal Prison System totaling $400K, awarded to Wellpath LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $400,000 ($400.0K)

Contractor: Wellpath LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-06-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 29 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: FY26- COMP. MEDICAL - JUNE DELIVERY/TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: NASHVILLE, DAVIDSON County, TENNESSEE, 37211

State: Tennessee Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $400,000 to WELLPATH LLC for work described as: FY26- COMP. MEDICAL - JUNE DELIVERY/TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the short duration and fixed-price nature of the task order. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the firm fixed-price contract type and short performance period. 4. Performance context is a single delivery order for medical services within a correctional facility. 5. Sector positioning is within the healthcare services sector, specifically for institutional settings.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The task order value of $400,000 for a one-month period of performance is within a reasonable range for specialized medical services in a federal correctional environment. Benchmarking against similar short-term medical support contracts for correctional facilities suggests this pricing is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure further supports value by capping the government's financial exposure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competitive nature of the award process suggests that the government sought the best value from the market. This approach typically leads to more favorable pricing and service offerings.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and improves service quality.

Public Impact

Inmates within the Federal Prison System in Tennessee will benefit from the provision of general medical and surgical hospital services. The services delivered are critical for maintaining the health and well-being of the incarcerated population. The geographic impact is localized to the specific federal correctional facility in Tennessee where the services are rendered. Workforce implications include the potential for temporary or contract medical professionals to support the delivery order.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service disruption if contractor performance is inadequate during the short period.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical medical services during the task order duration.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm fixed-price contract type limits cost uncertainty for the government.
Short duration minimizes long-term commitment risk.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the healthcare services sector, specifically serving the unique needs of correctional facilities. The market for providing medical services to government institutions is specialized, often requiring specific security clearances and operational protocols. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar short-term medical support in federal prisons are difficult to ascertain without more specific service details, but the $400,000 value for a month of service is indicative of a focused, high-need requirement.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was set aside for small businesses, nor is there information on subcontracting plans. As a delivery order under a larger potential contract, its impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on the overall structure and the prime contractor's subcontracting strategy, which is not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this delivery order would typically fall under the Federal Prison System's contracting and program management officials. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms and performance expectations. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available, though specific performance metrics are not detailed in this summary.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Medical Services
Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Contracts
Correctional Facility Medical Support

Risk Flags

Short performance period may limit contractor's ability to fully establish robust processes.
Dependence on contractor for critical health services requires diligent oversight.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $400,000 to WELLPATH LLC. FY26- COMP. MEDICAL - JUNE DELIVERY/TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WELLPATH LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $400,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-06-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Wellpath LLC in providing medical services to federal correctional facilities?

Wellpath LLC is a known provider of correctional healthcare services across various jurisdictions. Information regarding their specific track record with the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) would require a deeper dive into historical contract awards and performance reviews. Generally, companies in this space face scrutiny regarding quality of care, cost-effectiveness, and adherence to regulatory standards. Assessing Wellpath's specific performance with the BOP would involve examining past contract performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), any reported incidents or deficiencies, and their overall reputation within the correctional healthcare sector. Without access to these specific performance details for Wellpath's contracts with the BOP, a definitive assessment of their track record is limited to general industry knowledge.

How does the $400,000 value for a one-month delivery order compare to similar contracts for correctional healthcare?

The $400,000 value for a one-month delivery order for general medical and surgical hospital services within a federal correctional facility appears to be within a reasonable range, considering the specialized nature of the environment. However, a precise comparison is challenging without knowing the exact scope of services, patient population size, and specific medical needs addressed. Contracts for correctional healthcare can vary significantly based on the level of care required (e.g., primary care, specialty services, emergency response, mental health). A firm fixed-price contract for a short duration suggests a defined set of services or support. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this against other short-term, fixed-price delivery orders for similar medical support in federal or state correctional institutions, factoring in the number of individuals served and the complexity of medical requirements.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks associated with this specific contract award are relatively contained due to its nature as a short-term, firm fixed-price delivery order. Potential risks include inadequate service delivery by the contractor, leading to disruptions in inmate healthcare, although the short duration limits the impact. There's also a risk of unforeseen medical emergencies exceeding the scope or capacity anticipated, potentially requiring additional resources or emergency measures. Contractor performance issues, such as staffing shortages or quality of care concerns, are always a risk in healthcare contracts, but the limited timeframe mitigates the long-term exposure for the government. The government's risk is primarily tied to ensuring the contractor meets the defined service level for the one-month period.

How effective is a full and open competition for specialized medical services in a correctional setting?

A full and open competition for specialized medical services in a correctional setting is generally effective in promoting price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers. It allows a broad range of qualified providers to compete, potentially leading to better value and innovation. However, the effectiveness can be influenced by the specific requirements and the attractiveness of the contract to potential bidders. For correctional healthcare, the pool of qualified contractors might be limited due to the unique challenges and security requirements. While full and open competition is the preferred method, ensuring sufficient qualified bidders participate is crucial for its effectiveness in driving down costs and improving service quality in this niche market.

What are the historical spending patterns for medical services within the Federal Prison System?

Historical spending patterns for medical services within the Federal Prison System (FPS) indicate a significant and consistent investment in inmate healthcare. The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) manages a large population, necessitating substantial healthcare expenditures covering a wide range of services, from primary care to specialized treatments and mental health. Spending has generally trended upwards over the years, driven by factors such as an aging inmate population, increasing healthcare costs, and evolving medical standards. The BOP utilizes various contracting mechanisms, including indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts, task orders, and direct service contracts, to procure these services. Analyzing historical data reveals fluctuations based on specific needs, facility upgrades, and policy changes, but overall, healthcare remains a major operational cost for the FPS.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › General Medical and Surgical Hospitals › General Medical and Surgical Hospitals

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › GENERAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 15BFA022R00000020

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Boosted Commerce Inc.

Address: 3340 PERIMETER HILL DR, NASHVILLE, TN, 37211

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $400,000

Exercised Options: $400,000

Current Obligation: $400,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BFA024D00000019

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline