USDA awards $10,000 contract for wired telecommunications services to Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,000 ($10.0K)

Contractor: Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-09-29

Contract Duration: 173 days

Daily Burn Rate: $58/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: METTEL UTILITY ADMINISTRATIVE FEES PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 04/09/2026 - 09/29/2026, REFERENCE USDA BPA # 12314419A0013, PRIOR PO# 12639526F0033

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10041

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $10,000 to MANHATTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LLC for work described as: METTEL UTILITY ADMINISTRATIVE FEES PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 04/09/2026 - 09/29/2026, REFERENCE USDA BPA # 12314419A0013, PRIOR PO# 12639526F0033 Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused service need. 2. Short performance period indicates a potential for task-order based or interim support. 3. Wired telecommunications services are essential for agency operations. 4. The contract falls under the 'Wired Telecommunications Carriers' NAICS code. 5. Awarded under a broader BPA, suggesting a pre-vetted vendor pool. 6. Fixed-price contract type limits cost overrun risk for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $10,000 is minimal, making direct value-for-money assessment difficult without more context on the specific services rendered. Given the short performance period and the nature of telecommunications services, this amount could represent a reasonable cost for a limited scope of work or a specific service period. Benchmarking is challenging due to the small award amount and lack of detailed service descriptions.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This suggests a competitive environment, which typically drives better pricing and service offerings. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competition type implies a robust process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring the government receives competitive pricing and the best available services for the funds expended.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS). Provides essential wired telecommunications services. Services are delivered within New York. Supports the agency's operational infrastructure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm fixed-price contract type mitigates cost escalation risks.
Contract is a call against an existing BPA, suggesting vendor pre-qualification.

Sector Analysis

The wired telecommunications carriers sector involves companies that provide telecommunications services to businesses and consumers via wired networks. This contract, under NAICS code 517110, represents a small expenditure within this broad industry. The government often procures such services through larger agreements like Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to streamline the acquisition process for recurring needs.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to be specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information indicating subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The awardee, Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation LLC, is a significant telecommunications provider, suggesting it is not a small business itself. Further analysis would be needed to determine the overall impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Agriculture's contracting officers and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. As a call against a BPA, the initial vetting and oversight were likely conducted during the establishment of the BPA. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed service delivery oversight is an internal agency function.

Related Government Programs

USDA BPA # 12314419A0013
Wired Telecommunications Services
Federal Telecommunications Contracts

Risk Flags

Short performance period may indicate temporary or interim need.
Limited award value makes detailed performance benchmarking difficult.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $10,000 to MANHATTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LLC. METTEL UTILITY ADMINISTRATIVE FEES PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: 04/09/2026 - 09/29/2026, REFERENCE USDA BPA # 12314419A0013, PRIOR PO# 12639526F0033

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANHATTAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-09-29.

What specific wired telecommunications services are being procured under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'METTEL UTILITY ADMINISTRATIVE FEES' and falls under the NAICS code 517110 for Wired Telecommunications Carriers. However, the specific nature of these administrative fees or the exact telecommunications services is not detailed. It could range from basic line access, data transmission, or related support services necessary for the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service's operations in New York. Without further documentation, the precise scope remains unclear, but it is tied to the broader USDA BPA # 12314419A0013.

How does the $10,000 award compare to typical spending on wired telecommunications by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service?

The $10,000 award is a very small amount in the context of federal agency spending on telecommunications. Agencies like APHIS typically have much larger contracts for enterprise-wide network infrastructure, voice services, and data connectivity, often running into hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars annually. This specific award, with a short performance period of approximately six months, likely represents a minor, localized, or specialized service requirement, possibly an add-on to existing services or a bridge contract, rather than core telecommunications infrastructure spending.

What is the track record of Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation LLC with the federal government?

Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation LLC has a history of federal contracting. While this specific award is small, the fact that they are a party to a USDA BPA suggests they have met certain pre-qualification criteria. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases would reveal the full extent of their contract history, including past performance, award values, and agencies served. Their presence as a provider under a BPA indicates a level of established capability and experience relevant to government telecommunications needs.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract?

Given the small value and short duration, the primary risks are minimal. However, potential risks could include service disruptions if the vendor fails to perform adequately, although the firm fixed-price nature limits financial risk to the government. If this is a critical service, any interruption could impact APHIS operations. The reliance on a single vendor for this specific service, even if small, carries inherent risk. Ensuring the administrative fees align with actual service usage and market rates is also a consideration.

How does the 'full and open competition' for this BPA call translate to taxpayer value?

The 'full and open competition' for this BPA call means that multiple qualified vendors were allowed to compete for the opportunity to provide wired telecommunications services. This competitive process generally drives down prices and encourages vendors to offer higher quality services to win the contract. For taxpayers, this translates to a greater likelihood that the government is obtaining these services at a fair market price, maximizing the value of the appropriated funds. It prevents sole-source awards where prices might be inflated due to a lack of competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Information › Wired and Wireless Telecommunications (except Satellite) › Wired Telecommunications Carriers

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 55 WATER ST FL 32, NEW YORK, NY, 10041

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,000

Exercised Options: $10,000

Current Obligation: $10,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 12314425A0013

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline