Fluor Federal Solutions awarded $38M for facilities support services in Florida

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $38,066,719 ($38.1M)

Contractor: Fluor Federal Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-07-01

End Date: 2017-06-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $104.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF - OPTION YEAR 4 FFP

Place of Performance

Location: JACKSONVILLE, DUVAL County, FLORIDA, 32212

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $38.1 million to FLUOR FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF - OPTION YEAR 4 FFP Key points: 1. Contract provides essential facilities support, contributing to operational readiness. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. Option year 4 indicates a sustained need for these services. 5. Geographic concentration in Florida may offer localized economic benefits. 6. Contract value is substantial, requiring careful performance monitoring.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $38 million for a one-year period for facilities support services appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facilities management contracts for the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control when requirements are well-defined, indicating a good faith effort by the government to secure predictable pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. This process is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives competitive pricing. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the designation implies a robust competitive environment was sought.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process helps ensure taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

Benefits the Department of the Navy by ensuring operational facilities are maintained. Delivers comprehensive facilities support services, including maintenance and operations. Geographic impact is concentrated in Florida, supporting local infrastructure. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled trades and support staff in Florida.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs despite fixed-price.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure support.
Performance quality must be rigorously monitored to ensure standards are met.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract aligns contractor incentives with cost control.
Option year structure suggests satisfactory past performance.
Full and open competition indicates a competitive market was accessed.

Sector Analysis

Facilities support services represent a significant segment of the government contracting market, encompassing a wide range of maintenance, operations, and management functions. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale facilities management contracts within the Department of Defense can vary widely based on the specific services and geographic locations, but $38 million for a year of comprehensive support is a substantial investment.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While this contract itself is not directly set aside for small businesses, Fluor Federal Solutions, as a large prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors. The extent of subcontracting to small businesses would need further investigation to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting officers and program managers. Performance metrics and quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) are standard mechanisms to ensure contractor adherence to contract requirements. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support (BOS)
Logistics and Supply Chain Management
Facilities Engineering and Maintenance
Construction and Renovation Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed.
Performance quality requires continuous monitoring.
Contractor dependence for critical infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $38.1 million to FLUOR FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. IGF::OT::IGF - OPTION YEAR 4 FFP

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FLUOR FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $38.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-07-01. End: 2017-06-30.

What is the historical spending trend for Fluor Federal Solutions with the Department of Defense for facilities support services?

Analyzing Fluor Federal Solutions' historical spending with the Department of Defense for facilities support services requires accessing historical contract award data. This specific contract represents Option Year 4, indicating a multi-year relationship. To understand the trend, one would examine awards for similar services (NAICS code 561210) to Fluor Federal Solutions by the DoD over several fiscal years. This would reveal if spending has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and whether this $38 million award is an outlier or part of a steady pattern. It would also highlight the total value of contracts awarded to the company in this service category, providing context for the current award's significance and the contractor's sustained presence in this market segment.

How does the per-unit cost of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts awarded by the Navy?

Determining a precise per-unit cost comparison for this contract is challenging without detailed breakdowns of the services provided and their associated quantities (e.g., cost per square foot maintained, cost per service call). The contract is a firm-fixed-price award for comprehensive facilities support services, making direct per-unit benchmarking difficult. However, by analyzing the total contract value ($38,066,718.58) against the duration (364 days) and the known scope (facilities support services), one could derive an average daily or monthly cost. Comparing this average to similar large-scale facilities support contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy, adjusted for geographic location and specific service inclusions, would be necessary. A higher or lower average cost could indicate differences in efficiency, scope complexity, or market pricing.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Fluor Federal Solutions' performance under this contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for facilities support services contracts like this one typically focus on service delivery, responsiveness, and quality. Common KPIs include response times for maintenance requests (e.g., emergency, routine), completion rates for scheduled preventive maintenance, facility condition assessment scores, energy efficiency targets, and customer satisfaction ratings from facility occupants. The contract likely includes a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) outlining specific metrics, acceptable performance levels, and methods for monitoring and reporting. Failure to meet these KPIs could result in contractually defined remedies, such as price reductions or termination for default, ensuring accountability for service quality.

What is the risk profile associated with Fluor Federal Solutions as a contractor for this type of service?

Fluor Federal Solutions, as a large, established federal contractor, generally presents a moderate risk profile. Their extensive experience in government contracting, particularly in facilities support, suggests a strong understanding of requirements and compliance. However, risks can still exist. These may include potential performance issues if management or staffing levels are inadequate, financial stability concerns (though less likely for a large firm), or past performance issues on other contracts that might indicate a pattern. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract shifts performance risk to the contractor, but the government retains oversight risk related to ensuring adequate performance and preventing cost overruns due to contractor inefficiencies. A review of their past performance ratings and any significant contract disputes would provide a more granular risk assessment.

How has the total federal spending on facilities support services (NAICS 561210) evolved over the past five years?

Total federal spending on facilities support services, categorized under NAICS code 561210, has generally remained substantial, reflecting the government's ongoing need to maintain its vast infrastructure. Over the past five years, spending in this category has likely seen fluctuations influenced by factors such as base realignment and closure actions, new construction projects, and shifts in defense spending priorities. While specific year-over-year data requires detailed analysis of federal procurement databases, the overall trend indicates a consistent and significant investment in maintaining government facilities across various agencies. This sustained spending underscores the critical nature of these services and the competitive landscape among contractors vying for these long-term agreements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6945010R1255

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Fluor Corporation (UEI: 006907190)

Address: 100 FLUOR DANIEL DR, GREENVILLE, SC, 29607

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $38,066,719

Exercised Options: $38,066,719

Current Obligation: $38,066,719

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6945012D7582

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline