DoD's $27.2M Remediation Services Contract Awarded to TOLTEST, INC. for Environmental Cleanup
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,214,031 ($27.2M)
Contractor: Toltest, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-08-31
End Date: 2006-11-30
Contract Duration: 456 days
Daily Burn Rate: $59.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 40
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.2 million to TOLTEST, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Value for money assessed against comparable environmental remediation contracts. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, potentially driving competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are being monitored for project completion and environmental compliance. 4. Performance context is crucial for understanding the effectiveness of remediation efforts. 5. Sector positioning places this contract within the broader environmental services market for defense. 6. The contract duration of 456 days suggests a significant scope of work.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $27.2 million for remediation services appears within a typical range for large-scale environmental cleanup projects. Benchmarking against similar Department of Defense contracts for hazardous waste management and site remediation indicates that the pricing structure, while not detailed here, is likely competitive given the full and open competition. However, without specific details on the scope of work and the types of remediation required, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Further analysis would require comparing the unit costs for specific remediation activities against industry standards.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of a competitive bidding process is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring that the government receives the best possible value. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust competition.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of companies to compete, which typically leads to lower prices and more innovative solutions, maximizing the return on public funds.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense benefits from environmental compliance and reduced liability. Services delivered include remediation of contaminated sites, ensuring environmental safety. Geographic impact is localized to the specific military installation requiring remediation. Workforce implications include employment for environmental scientists, engineers, and technicians.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen environmental conditions arise.
- Ensuring long-term effectiveness of remediation techniques requires ongoing monitoring.
- Compliance with evolving environmental regulations could impact project scope and cost.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Contractor has experience in remediation services, indicated by the award.
- Clear contract end date provides a defined project timeline.
Sector Analysis
The environmental remediation services sector is a critical component of the broader industrial services market, supporting government and private entities in managing environmental liabilities. This contract falls within the government's significant spending on environmental cleanup and compliance, particularly for defense installations. Comparable spending benchmarks in this sector often vary widely based on the complexity and scale of the contamination, but contracts in the tens of millions are common for large-scale projects.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this prime contract is likely minimal unless TOLTEST, INC. engages them as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be necessary to assess the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program management office within the Department of the Air Force. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to milestones. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Restoration, Superfund
- Hazardous Waste Management
- Site Remediation Services
- Defense Environmental Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions.
- Ensuring long-term effectiveness of remediation technologies.
- Compliance with evolving environmental regulations.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, air-force, remediation-services, environmental-services, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, large-contract, environmental-cleanup, hazardous-waste
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.2 million to TOLTEST, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TOLTEST, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-08-31. End: 2006-11-30.
What is the specific nature of the environmental remediation required under this contract, and what types of contaminants are being addressed?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Remediation Services' (NAICS 562910) awarded to TOLTEST, INC. by the Department of the Air Force. While the specific contaminants and remediation techniques are not detailed in the summary data, this NAICS code typically covers establishments primarily engaged in cleaning up contaminated sites, including soil, groundwater, and surface water. This can involve a wide range of activities such as hazardous waste treatment, site closure, demolition, and environmental consulting. Common contaminants addressed in such contracts include petroleum hydrocarbons, heavy metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other industrial pollutants. The scope would likely involve site assessment, feasibility studies, design of remediation systems, implementation of cleanup technologies (e.g., soil vapor extraction, bioremediation, pump-and-treat), and long-term monitoring to ensure compliance with environmental regulations.
How does the awarded amount of $27.2 million compare to the typical cost of similar environmental remediation projects for military installations?
The $27.2 million award for remediation services is a substantial amount, reflecting the complexity and scale often associated with environmental cleanup at military installations. Such projects can involve extensive site investigations, the removal or treatment of hazardous materials, and long-term monitoring. Comparing this to similar contracts requires access to a database of historical awards for environmental remediation services within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. However, based on general industry knowledge, projects of this magnitude are not uncommon for addressing legacy contamination issues, such as those arising from past industrial activities or fuel storage. The cost is heavily influenced by factors like the type and extent of contamination, the chosen remediation technologies, regulatory requirements, and the duration of the project. Without more specific details on the scope, a precise comparison is difficult, but the figure is within the expected range for significant environmental restoration efforts.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of TOLTEST, INC. in fulfilling this remediation contract?
Key performance indicators (KPIs) for environmental remediation contracts typically focus on achieving specific cleanup goals, adhering to regulatory standards, and managing project timelines and budgets. For this contract, KPIs would likely include the successful reduction of contaminant levels in soil and groundwater to meet or exceed established cleanup standards (e.g., EPA or state environmental agency regulations). Performance would also be measured by the timely completion of project milestones, adherence to the approved budget, and the effectiveness of the chosen remediation technologies. Safety performance, including incident rates and compliance with environmental health and safety protocols, is also a critical KPI. Furthermore, the contractor's ability to provide accurate and timely reporting on progress, environmental monitoring data, and project status would be evaluated. The contract itself would outline specific deliverables and acceptance criteria that serve as the basis for performance evaluation.
What is the track record of TOLTEST, INC. in handling large-scale federal environmental remediation contracts, and have they encountered significant performance issues in the past?
Assessing the track record of TOLTEST, INC. requires a review of their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving environmental remediation. Publicly available contract databases and performance assessment reports (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) can provide insights into their history. Without direct access to such detailed performance data for TOLTEST, INC., it's difficult to definitively state their track record. However, being awarded a $27.2 million contract by the Department of the Air Force suggests they possess the necessary qualifications, experience, and financial stability to undertake such projects. Companies in this sector often have a portfolio of completed projects, and their performance is typically evaluated based on factors like quality of work, timeliness, cost control, and adherence to regulations. Any significant past performance issues, such as major cost overruns, schedule delays, or regulatory non-compliance, would likely be documented in performance reviews and could influence future contract awards.
What is the historical spending pattern for remediation services by the Department of the Air Force, and how does this contract fit into that trend?
The Department of the Air Force, like other branches of the military, has a long history of significant spending on environmental remediation due to the extensive use and historical operations of its installations. This spending is driven by federal mandates such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Historical spending patterns often show consistent investment in addressing legacy contamination, managing hazardous waste, and ensuring compliance with environmental regulations. The $27.2 million award to TOLTEST, INC. for remediation services fits within this ongoing trend of substantial federal investment in environmental cleanup. It represents a portion of the Air Force's broader environmental restoration program, which aims to identify, assess, and remediate contaminated sites across its global infrastructure. The specific amount reflects the scale and complexity of the particular site or sites requiring attention under this contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 40
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lakeshore Toltest Corporation (UEI: 962400151)
Address: 1915 N 12TH STREET, TOLEDO, OH, 09
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,214,031
Exercised Options: $27,214,031
Current Obligation: $27,214,031
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA890304D8678
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-08-31
Current End Date: 2006-11-30
Potential End Date: 2006-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-09-27
More Contracts from Toltest, Inc.
- Repair Runway 14/32, Dover AFB, DE — $54.8M (Department of Defense)
- Construction Repair/Replacement of Runway 06/24 AT Mcguire AFB, NJ — $51.6M (Department of Defense)
- Renovate Vandenberg Hall — $37.7M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $35.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200611!001894!5700!fa8903!hsw/Pkv !FA890306D8519 !A!N! !N!0006 ! !20060825!20070405!047306055!047306055!047306055!n!toltest, Inc !1480 Ford ST !maumee !OH!43537!00000! !IZ! ! !iraq !+000017401054!n!n!000000000000!y199!other Miscellaneous Buildings !C2 !construction !000 !NOT Discernable !236220!E! !5!B!M! !A!A!20110501!B! ! !A! !a!u!u!2!006!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!M!N! ! ! ! ! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $34.2M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)