DoD Awards $79M Contract for Architect-Engineering Services to URS Group, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,129,268 ($12.1M)

Contractor: URS Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-12-30

End Date: 2008-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,736 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 81

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TAS::57 3400::TAS 200404!000215!5700!GW05 !HSW/PKV !F4162403D8609 !A!N! !N!0096 ! !20031230!20050430!791684780!124252052!043271568!N!URS GROUP, INC !7101 WISCONSIN AVE SUITE !BETHESDA !MD!20814!44756!067!06!MCCLELLAN AFB !SACRAMENTO !CALIFORNIA!+000002582320!N!N!000000000000!C211!ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !ZBC !BRAC !541330!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!N!Y!2!081!D! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!Y! !N! !Y! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MCCLELLAN, SACRAMENTO County, CALIFORNIA, 95652

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $12.1 million to URS GROUP, INC. for work described as: TAS::57 3400::TAS 200404!000215!5700!GW05 !HSW/PKV !F4162403D8609 !A!N! !N!0096 ! !20031230!20050430!791684780!124252052!043271568!N!URS GROUP, INC !7101 WISCONSIN AVE SUITE !BETHESDA !MD!20814!44756!067!06!MCCLELL… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for architect-engineering services, primarily for construction-related activities. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is over 4 years, indicating a significant project timeline. 4. The awardee, URS Group, Inc., is a large business, with no indication of small business participation. 5. The contract falls under the Remediation Services NAICS code, suggesting environmental or facility-related work.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $79,168,478 is substantial for architect-engineering services. Without specific benchmarks for similar BRAC remediation projects, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the duration and scope suggest a potentially fair price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The use of Time and Materials pricing could introduce some cost uncertainty if not managed closely.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best value. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure cost efficiency.

Public Impact

Supports military base closure (BRAC) initiatives, potentially impacting environmental cleanup and facility redevelopment. Provides essential architectural and engineering expertise for complex government projects. The contract's success could influence future infrastructure development and environmental remediation efforts within the DoD.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 69 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials pricing can lead to cost overruns if not strictly managed.
Lack of small business participation noted.
Contract awarded during a period of significant government spending.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Significant contract value indicates a critical need for services.
Long-term contract duration allows for project continuity.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction and Engineering Services sector, specifically related to remediation. Government spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs, environmental regulations, and base realignment and closure (BRAC) initiatives. Benchmarks for similar large-scale remediation projects are essential for a complete value assessment.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was awarded to a large business (URS Group, Inc.) and does not show any specific set-asides or subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved in the subcontracting chain.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, part of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve contract officers, program managers, and potentially inspectors general to ensure compliance with terms, quality, and budget.

Related Government Programs

Remediation Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
Lack of explicit small business participation.
Contract awarded during a period of high government spending.
The specific nature of 'Remediation Services' can involve unforeseen environmental complexities.
Long contract duration increases exposure to changing requirements or economic conditions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $12.1 million to URS GROUP, INC.. TAS::57 3400::TAS 200404!000215!5700!GW05 !HSW/PKV !F4162403D8609 !A!N! !N!0096 ! !20031230!20050430!791684780!124252052!043271568!N!URS GROUP, INC !7101 WISCONSIN AVE SUITE !BETHESDA !MD!20814!44756!067!06!MCCLELLAN AFB !SACRAMENTO !CALIFORNIA!+000002582320!N!N!000000000000!C211!ARCHITECT-ENGINEERING SERVICES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !ZBC !BRAC !541330!E

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-12-30. End: 2008-09-30.

What specific remediation activities does this contract cover, and how do they align with BRAC objectives?

This contract is for Architect-Engineering Services, with a PSC code indicating Construction and a NAICS code for Remediation Services. It likely supports the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program by providing design, planning, and oversight for environmental cleanup, demolition, or redevelopment of former military facilities. The specific activities would depend on the site's needs, such as hazardous material abatement, soil remediation, or infrastructure design for new uses.

What are the potential risks associated with the Time and Materials pricing structure for this large contract?

The primary risk with Time and Materials (T&M) contracts is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for actual labor hours and material costs incurred by the contractor. Without robust oversight, cost ceilings, and clear task definitions, contractors may lack incentives to control expenses. For a contract of this size and duration, effective monitoring is crucial to ensure the government receives good value and avoids excessive spending.

How does the $79M award compare to typical spending on similar architect-engineering remediation services for BRAC projects?

Assessing the $79M award against typical spending requires detailed market research on similar BRAC remediation projects. Factors like geographic location, environmental complexity, and the scope of services (design, environmental assessment, construction oversight) significantly influence costs. While substantial, this figure could be reasonable if the project involves extensive environmental cleanup or complex facility redevelopment. Benchmarking against comparable projects is essential for a definitive comparison.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 81

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 2020 K STREET NW SUITE 300 HDQ CAGE WILLIAM R. SMITH, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: F4162403D8609

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline