Navy Seabee ETS Units Contract Awarded to EAI Corporation for $17.57M
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,572,797 ($17.6M)
Contractor: EAI Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-07-31
End Date: 2009-07-31
Contract Duration: 731 days
Daily Burn Rate: $24.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: NAVY SEABEE ETS UNITS
Place of Performance
Location: ABINGDON, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21009
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.6 million to EAI CORPORATION for work described as: NAVY SEABEE ETS UNITS Key points: 1. Contract Value: $17.57 million for 731 days. 2. Competition: Full and open competition was utilized. 3. Risk: Firm Fixed Price contract type suggests moderate risk. 4. Sector: Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $17.57 million over two years for miscellaneous durable goods appears within a reasonable range for specialized equipment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale equipment procurements would be necessary for a definitive assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing by allowing all eligible vendors to submit proposals.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes market competition, potentially leading to lower prices and better value for government procurements.
Public Impact
Supports Navy construction and engineering operations. Procurement of specialized equipment for Seabee units. Potential impact on readiness and operational capabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Contract duration of 731 days may lead to obsolescence concerns for electronic equipment.
- Lack of specific details on the 'ETS UNITS' makes it difficult to assess true value.
- No indication of small business participation.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on defense needs and infrastructure projects. Benchmarks are difficult without specific product details.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award, as the 'ss' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed for small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army for the Navy, suggesting inter-service coordination. Oversight would focus on contract performance, delivery schedules, and adherence to specifications.
Related Government Programs
- Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific product details ('ETS UNITS').
- Potential for equipment obsolescence due to contract duration.
- No indication of small business involvement.
- Limited insight into the competitive landscape for these specific units.
Tags
other-miscellaneous-durable-goods-mercha, department-of-defense, md, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.6 million to EAI CORPORATION. NAVY SEABEE ETS UNITS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EAI CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-07-31. End: 2009-07-31.
What specific 'ETS UNITS' were procured, and what is their operational necessity for Seabee units?
The provided data lacks specificity regarding the 'ETS UNITS'. Understanding the exact nature of this equipment, its technological capabilities, and its direct role in supporting Seabee operations is crucial for assessing its true value and necessity. Without this information, it's challenging to determine if the $17.57 million expenditure aligns with critical mission requirements or represents an over-allocation of resources.
What are the potential risks associated with a two-year contract for potentially electronic equipment, given technological advancements?
A two-year contract duration for equipment, especially if it involves electronics, carries a risk of obsolescence. Rapid technological advancements could render the procured 'ETS UNITS' outdated before the contract's end or shortly thereafter. This could lead to reduced operational effectiveness and the need for premature replacement, diminishing the long-term value of the initial investment and potentially requiring additional, unplanned expenditures.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best possible price and value for these specialized units?
While full and open competition is designed to foster competitive pricing, its effectiveness in securing the best value for specialized 'ETS UNITS' depends on the market's ability to supply such items and the clarity of the solicitation's technical requirements. If the market for these specific units is limited or if the technical specifications were overly restrictive, the competition might not have yielded the most advantageous pricing or the most suitable technology available.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers › Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: FIRE/RESCUE/SAFETY; ENVIRO PROTECT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1308 CONTINENTAL DRIVE, ABINGDON, MD, 01
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,572,797
Exercised Options: $17,572,797
Current Obligation: $17,572,797
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: M6700404D0039
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-07-31
Current End Date: 2009-07-31
Potential End Date: 2009-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-04-29
More Contracts from EAI Corporation
- Training Support — $140.8M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Managerial Services — $33.9M (Department of Defense)
- Upgrade Analytical Laboratory System — $29.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200309!000657!2100!AD13 !USA Materiel Command Acquisition!daad1303c0042 !A!N! !N! !20030530!20040430!042217141!042217141!042217141!n!eai Corporation !1308 Continental Drive !abingdon !md!21009!00200!025!24!abingdon !harford !maryland !+000000827160!n!n!000004842111!b541!defense Studies !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!1000!not Discernable or Classified !541690!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !b!b!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $28.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200606!009953!1700!m67004!commander !M6700404D0039 !A!N! !N!0030 ! !20060314!20060930!042217141!042217141!042217141!n!eai Corporation !1308 Continental Drive !abingdon !md!21009!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000012222742!n!n!000000000000!r707!contract, Procurement & Acquisition Support Svcs !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!009!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! !1727!N00052!0001! ! — $21.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)