DoD awards $9.8M for Military Working Dog Equipment, with EAI Corporation as the sole awardee
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,882,956 ($9.9M)
Contractor: EAI Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-03-30
End Date: 2009-12-30
Contract Duration: 1,006 days
Daily Burn Rate: $9.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: Defense
Official Description: MILITARY WORKING DOG EQUIPMENT
Place of Performance
Location: ABINGDON, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21009
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $9.9 million to EAI CORPORATION for work described as: MILITARY WORKING DOG EQUIPMENT Key points: 1. The contract value of $9.8M for specialized equipment suggests a significant investment in canine support capabilities. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a broad market search. 3. The duration of the contract (over 2 years) implies a need for sustained supply and support. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 423990 points to a wholesale trade of miscellaneous durable goods. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, highlighting its role in military logistics and operations. 6. The absence of small business set-aside indicates the primary contractor is not a small business, and subcontracting opportunities may be limited.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of $9.8M for Military Working Dog Equipment is challenging without specific itemization and market data. However, the contract duration of over two years suggests a steady supply chain requirement. The award amount appears reasonable for specialized equipment supporting a critical military function, but a detailed cost breakdown would be necessary for a definitive value assessment. Compared to similar contracts for specialized military equipment, the price point seems within a plausible range, assuming high-quality, durable goods.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 9 bids indicates a healthy level of interest and engagement from the market. This competitive process is generally expected to drive better pricing and innovation for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value by encouraging a wide range of offers and potentially lower prices through market forces.
Public Impact
Military working dogs and their handlers benefit from access to essential, high-quality equipment. The contract supports the operational readiness and effectiveness of military canine units. The services delivered likely include the provision of durable gear, training aids, and maintenance supplies for the dogs. The geographic impact is likely widespread, supporting military installations where working dogs are deployed globally. Workforce implications include ensuring the availability of necessary equipment for military personnel responsible for canine operations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on the equipment procured makes it difficult to assess if the $9.8M represents optimal value.
- The contract duration of over two years could lead to potential price increases if market conditions change significantly.
- Without a breakdown of awarded items, it's hard to confirm if the equipment meets the most current technological standards.
Positive Signals
- The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust market search.
- The receipt of 9 bids indicates significant vendor interest and a competitive environment.
- The award to EAI Corporation suggests they possess the capabilities to meet the specialized requirements for military working dog equipment.
Sector Analysis
The market for military working dog equipment falls within the broader defense logistics and specialized equipment sector. This sector is characterized by stringent quality requirements, long product lifecycles, and a demand for durable, reliable goods. Spending in this area is driven by the operational needs of military and law enforcement agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without detailed specifications, but the $9.8M award reflects a significant commitment to equipping these specialized units.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the awardee, EAI Corporation, is not listed as a small business. This suggests that the primary contract was awarded to a larger entity. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award, which could limit opportunities for smaller firms to participate in this specific contract's fulfillment.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would include performance monitoring, adherence to contract terms, and quality control of the delivered equipment. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific details of the equipment and pricing may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Military Equipment Procurement
- Defense Logistics Support
- Animal Care and Equipment
- Specialized Military Supplies
Risk Flags
- Contract Duration
- Lack of Specific Itemization
- Potential for Price Volatility Over Time
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, eai-corporation, military-working-dog-equipment, durable-goods, wholesale-trade, full-and-open-competition, multi-year-contract, maryland, non-small-business-award
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $9.9 million to EAI CORPORATION. MILITARY WORKING DOG EQUIPMENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EAI CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-03-30. End: 2009-12-30.
What specific types of equipment were procured under this $9.8M contract for Military Working Dog Equipment?
The provided data does not specify the exact types of equipment procured under this $9.8M contract. However, based on the description 'MILITARY WORKING DOG EQUIPMENT' and the NAICS code 423990 (Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers), it can be inferred that the contract likely covered a range of durable goods essential for the care, training, and operational deployment of military working dogs. This could include items such as specialized harnesses, protective gear (like vests and boots), muzzles, leashes, feeding and watering equipment, grooming tools, transport crates, and potentially training aids. The exact composition and quantity of these items would determine the overall value and suitability of the procurement.
How does the contract duration of over two years (1006 days) impact the value proposition for the government?
A contract duration of over two years for military working dog equipment suggests a need for sustained supply and potentially ongoing support or maintenance. From a value perspective, a longer duration can offer price stability, as the government locks in rates for an extended period, potentially shielding it from short-term market fluctuations. It also reduces the administrative burden and cost associated with frequent re-competition. However, it also carries risks, such as the possibility of technological obsolescence if the equipment is highly specialized and rapidly evolving, or potential price increases if raw material costs or manufacturing expenses rise significantly over the contract term. The government's ability to negotiate favorable terms for such a long period is crucial for maximizing value.
What does the fact that 9 bids were received under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' signify for price discovery?
The receipt of 9 bids under a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' is a strong positive indicator for price discovery. It signifies that the government's solicitation was widely disseminated, and a substantial number of potential vendors found the opportunity attractive enough to invest resources in preparing and submitting proposals. A larger pool of bidders generally leads to more robust competition, forcing each bidder to offer competitive pricing and terms to win the contract. This increased competition enhances the likelihood that the government will secure the best possible price for the required military working dog equipment, reflecting a more accurate market valuation.
What is the track record of EAI CORPORATION in supplying similar military equipment?
The provided data identifies EAI CORPORATION as the awardee but does not offer details on their specific track record in supplying military working dog equipment or similar items. To assess their track record, further investigation would be required, including reviewing past performance evaluations on federal contracts, examining their company history, and looking for any publicly available information regarding their experience in defense contracting, particularly in specialized equipment. Without this information, it is difficult to definitively gauge their reliability, quality of past work, and ability to meet the demands of this specific contract.
How does the spending of $9.8M on military working dog equipment compare to historical patterns or other agencies?
The provided data does not include historical spending patterns for military working dog equipment or comparative spending data from other agencies. To make such a comparison, one would need access to historical contract databases (e.g., FPDS) to analyze previous awards for similar equipment, potentially across different branches of the military or even federal law enforcement agencies that utilize working dogs. Analyzing the trend of spending over time and comparing the per-unit cost or total contract value against similar procurements would provide context on whether $9.8M represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in this capability.
Are there any specific risk indicators associated with this contract award to EAI CORPORATION?
Based solely on the provided data, there are no explicit risk indicators mentioned regarding this contract award to EAI CORPORATION. However, potential risks in any federal contract can include factors not detailed here, such as the contractor's financial stability, past performance issues (if any), the complexity of the equipment requiring specialized manufacturing or integration, or potential supply chain vulnerabilities. The fact that it was a full and open competition with multiple bids might mitigate some risks by ensuring a competitive selection process. A comprehensive risk assessment would require access to contractor performance data, financial health reports, and details about the specific nature of the equipment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers › Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: FIRE/RESCUE/SAFETY; ENVIRO PROTECT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1308 CONTINENTAL DRIVE, ABINGDON, MD, 01
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $9,882,956
Exercised Options: $9,882,956
Current Obligation: $9,882,956
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: M6700404D0039
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-03-30
Current End Date: 2009-12-30
Potential End Date: 2009-12-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2009-09-29
More Contracts from EAI Corporation
- Training Support — $140.8M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Managerial Services — $33.9M (Department of Defense)
- Upgrade Analytical Laboratory System — $29.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200309!000657!2100!AD13 !USA Materiel Command Acquisition!daad1303c0042 !A!N! !N! !20030530!20040430!042217141!042217141!042217141!n!eai Corporation !1308 Continental Drive !abingdon !md!21009!00200!025!24!abingdon !harford !maryland !+000000827160!n!n!000004842111!b541!defense Studies !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!1000!not Discernable or Classified !541690!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !b!b!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $28.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200606!009953!1700!m67004!commander !M6700404D0039 !A!N! !N!0030 ! !20060314!20060930!042217141!042217141!042217141!n!eai Corporation !1308 Continental Drive !abingdon !md!21009!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000012222742!n!n!000000000000!r707!contract, Procurement & Acquisition Support Svcs !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!009!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! !1727!N00052!0001! ! — $21.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)