Army's $26.2M TSS Enterprise Mission Support Services contract awarded to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,204,134 ($26.2M)

Contractor: Calibre Systems Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2015-11-06

End Date: 2019-03-12

Contract Duration: 1,222 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF TSS ENTERPRISE MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FORT IRWIN, SAN BERNARDINO County, CALIFORNIA, 92310

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.2 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF TSS ENTERPRISE MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract was for mission support services, a broad category that can encompass various operational needs. 3. The duration of the contract (1222 days) indicates a medium-term engagement for service provision. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs by establishing a set price for services. 5. The award was a delivery order, implying it was part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar framework. 6. The contractor, CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, has a track record with federal contracts, as indicated by the award data. 7. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, for the specified period. 8. The contract was not set aside for small businesses, suggesting it was open to all eligible bidders.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $26.2 million contract is challenging without more specific details on the services rendered. The contract was awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, which generally provides cost certainty for the government. However, the raw dollar amount does not inherently indicate value for money. A comparison to similar mission support services contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or other defense agencies during the same period would be necessary to assess if the pricing was competitive. Without detailed performance metrics or a breakdown of services, it's difficult to definitively assess the efficiency and effectiveness of the spending.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data shows two bids were received (no: 2). A competitive process like this is generally expected to yield better pricing and service options for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards. The presence of multiple bidders suggests that the market had sufficient interest and capability to provide the required mission support services.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process as it typically drives down costs and encourages innovation, leading to more efficient use of public funds. The government can procure services at a price that reflects market conditions rather than a negotiated rate with a single provider.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries of this contract are likely components within the Department of the Army that require mission support services. Services delivered would have supported the operational readiness and administrative functions of the Army. The geographic impact is primarily within California, where the contractor is located, but the services could have supported Army operations nationwide or globally. The contract supported the workforce of CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, contributing to employment in the professional, scientific, and technical services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition (2 bidders) may not have fully explored the market's potential for cost savings.
The broad nature of 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' makes it difficult to assess specific performance outcomes and value.
The contract duration of over three years could lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it hard to gauge the quality of services delivered.
The contract was a delivery order, suggesting it might be part of a larger, potentially less scrutinized, IDIQ vehicle.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a fair and accessible bidding process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost predictability for the government.
The contractor, CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, is an established entity with experience in federal contracting.
The contract supported essential mission functions within the Department of the Army.
The services were provided over a defined period, allowing for structured engagement and oversight.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically NAICS code 541990 (All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services). This is a broad category encompassing a wide range of support functions for government agencies. The federal spending in this sector is substantial, with agencies frequently outsourcing specialized expertise and operational support. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for mission support, program management, and technical services awarded to various defense and civilian agencies, considering factors like contract duration, scope of work, and contractor size.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). The award to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, a presumably larger entity given its federal contracting history, suggests that the competition was open to businesses of various sizes. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses within the provided data. Without this, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though the absence of a set-aside implies that larger prime contractors were expected to compete.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of the Army. As a delivery order under a potential larger IDIQ, oversight might be integrated into the management of that parent contract. Accountability measures would be tied to the firm-fixed-price terms and any performance standards outlined in the contract's statement of work. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, where basic award information is published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Army Mission Support Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts
Department of Defense Enterprise Support Contracts
Federal IT and Management Support Services
Defense Agency Operational Support

Risk Flags

Limited competition (2 bidders)
Broad service category (NAICS 541990)
Delivery Order award mechanism

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.2 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. IGF::CT::IGF TSS ENTERPRISE MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-11-06. End: 2019-03-12.

What specific mission support services were provided under this contract?

The provided data classifies this contract under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' This is a very broad category and does not specify the exact services rendered. Typically, mission support services for the Department of the Army can encompass a wide array of functions, including but not limited to program management, administrative support, logistical assistance, technical consulting, training development, cybersecurity support, and operational planning. Without access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) or task orders, it is impossible to detail the precise nature of the services provided by CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. Further investigation into the specific delivery orders issued under this contract would be necessary to understand the granular details of the support provided.

How does the $26.2 million total award value compare to similar contracts for mission support services?

Comparing the $26.2 million award value requires identifying similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or other defense agencies for comparable mission support services during the 2015-2019 timeframe. Factors such as the scope of work, duration, number of personnel supported, and specific deliverables are crucial for a meaningful comparison. For instance, if other contracts for similar scope and duration ranged from $20 million to $30 million, this award would appear within the expected market range. Conversely, if comparable contracts were significantly lower, it might suggest potential overpricing or a more extensive scope. Accessing detailed contract databases and performing a comparative analysis of contract line item numbers (CLINs) and service descriptions is essential for a robust benchmark.

What is the track record of CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC with federal contracts, particularly within the Department of Defense?

CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC has a significant track record of receiving federal contracts, including numerous awards from the Department of Defense. The provided data indicates this specific contract was awarded to them. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases would reveal the total value and volume of contracts awarded to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC over time, the types of services they have provided, and their performance history. Agencies often maintain internal contractor performance assessment reporting systems (CPARS) that provide qualitative feedback on contractor performance. Examining these records, if publicly accessible or obtainable through specific requests, would offer insights into their reliability, quality of service, and overall performance in fulfilling government requirements.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how was performance measured?

The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or details on how performance was measured for this contract. Typically, for mission support services, KPIs could include metrics related to response times, accuracy of reports, successful completion of tasks, adherence to deadlines, customer satisfaction, and cost control. Performance measurement is usually documented through Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) reports, which are completed by the government's technical monitors or contracting officers' representatives. Without access to the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) and any associated performance work statements (PWS), it is not possible to identify the specific KPIs or the methodology used to assess CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC's performance.

How has federal spending on 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' (NAICS 541990) evolved over the period this contract was active (2015-2019)?

Federal spending on NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services,' generally saw fluctuations but remained a significant category throughout the 2015-2019 period. This category is broad and captures a diverse range of services, making overall trend analysis complex. However, agencies like the Department of Defense consistently rely on these services for specialized support. Spending in this sector is often influenced by overall defense budgets, specific program requirements, and the government's strategy regarding outsourcing versus in-house capabilities. Examining aggregated federal procurement data from sources like USASpending.gov would reveal the total outlays for this NAICS code year-over-year, showing whether spending was increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable during the contract's active period.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W911S010R0008

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6354 WALKER LN STE 300, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,204,134

Exercised Options: $26,204,134

Current Obligation: $26,204,134

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $8,881,642

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911S011D0046

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline