Department of Defense awards $981,942 contract for procurement support services to EAI Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $9,819,429 ($9.8M)
Contractor: EAI Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-12-08
End Date: 2010-09-30
Contract Duration: 1,757 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200603!009322!1700!M67004!COMMANDER !M6700404D0039 !A!N! !N!0028 ! !20051208!20060930!042217141!042217141!042217141!N!EAI CORPORATION !1308 CONTINENTAL DRIVE !ABINGDON !MD!21009!00200!025!24!ABINGDON !HARFORD !MARYLAND !+000005182687!N!N!000000000000!R707!CONTRACT, PROCUREMENT & ACQUISITION SUPPORT SVCS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!009!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1727!M67854!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: ABINGDON, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21009
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $9.8 million to EAI CORPORATION for work described as: 200603!009322!1700!M67004!COMMANDER !M6700404D0039 !A!N! !N!0028 ! !20051208!20060930!042217141!042217141!042217141!N!EAI CORPORATION !1308 CONTINENTAL DRIVE !ABINGDON !MD!21009!00200!025!24!ABINGDON !HARF… Key points: 1. Contract provides essential acquisition and procurement support, indicating a need for specialized expertise. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a robust marketplace for these services. 3. A relatively long contract duration of over 1700 days implies a significant, ongoing requirement. 4. The contract's value is substantial, reflecting the complexity and importance of the services rendered. 5. EAI Corporation's performance and track record will be key indicators of value for money. 6. The specific nature of 'Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers' NAICS code is unclear in relation to procurement services.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $981,942 over approximately 4.8 years results in an average annual spend of roughly $204,571. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for procurement and acquisition support services is challenging without more specific service details. However, the total value appears moderate for a multi-year federal support contract. The absence of detailed performance metrics or cost breakdowns makes a definitive value-for-money assessment difficult.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 9 bids suggests a competitive environment, which typically drives better pricing and service offerings for the government. The level of competition is a positive sign for price discovery and ensuring the government receives a fair market price.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of providers to compete, potentially leading to cost savings and improved service quality compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.
Public Impact
The Department of the Army benefits from specialized procurement and acquisition support services. Services delivered likely include contract administration, strategic sourcing, and acquisition planning. The geographic impact is primarily within the agency's operational areas, with potential for remote support. Workforce implications include the potential for specialized roles within EAI Corporation and support for government acquisition personnel.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The NAICS code 'Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers' (423990) seems incongruent with 'CONTRACT, PROCUREMENT & ACQUISITION SUPPORT SVCS', raising questions about the classification or the specific nature of the services provided.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics or deliverables makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the services rendered.
- The contract duration is substantial, increasing the risk associated with potential changes in government needs or technology over time.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a healthy competitive process.
- The contract has a clear start and end date, providing defined project parameters.
- The award value is clearly stated, offering transparency on the financial commitment.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically supporting government acquisition and procurement functions. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous firms offering expertise in navigating federal procurement regulations and processes. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific services rendered, but federal spending on acquisition support is significant across various agencies.
Small Business Impact
There is no explicit indication of a small business set-aside for this contract. The award to EAI Corporation, a single entity, does not preclude subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. However, without specific subcontracting plans or goals detailed in the award, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem remains unclear.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though detailed performance data may not always be publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy
- Army Contracting Command
- Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Services
- Contract Management Support Services
Risk Flags
- NAICS code mismatch with service description.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics.
- Long contract duration increases potential for obsolescence or changing requirements.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, procurement-support, acquisition-support, professional-services, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, eai-corporation, maryland, service-contract, miscellaneous-business-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $9.8 million to EAI CORPORATION. 200603!009322!1700!M67004!COMMANDER !M6700404D0039 !A!N! !N!0028 ! !20051208!20060930!042217141!042217141!042217141!N!EAI CORPORATION !1308 CONTINENTAL DRIVE !ABINGDON !MD!21009!00200!025!24!ABINGDON !HARFORD !MARYLAND !+000005182687!N!N!000000000000!R707!CONTRACT, PROCUREMENT & ACQUISITION SUPPORT SVCS !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !999
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EAI CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $9.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-12-08. End: 2010-09-30.
What specific procurement and acquisition support services does EAI Corporation provide under this contract, and how do they align with the assigned NAICS code?
The provided data lists the service type as 'CONTRACT, PROCUREMENT & ACQUISITION SUPPORT SVCS' and the NAICS code as '541990 - Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers'. This presents a potential discrepancy, as NAICS 541990 typically covers establishments primarily engaged in providing a variety of miscellaneous business services not elsewhere classified, which can include some support functions, but is not specific to procurement. It's possible the services involve logistical support or supply chain management related to durable goods, or that the NAICS code is a broad classification. Without further details on the Statement of Work (SOW), it is difficult to ascertain the precise nature of the services and their alignment with the NAICS code. Further investigation into the contract's SOW would be necessary to clarify this potential mismatch and understand the specific value EAI Corporation is delivering.
How does the contract value of $981,942 compare to similar procurement support contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?
The total contract value of $981,942 over its duration (December 8, 2005, to September 30, 2010) averages approximately $204,571 per year. Benchmarking this requires comparing it to contracts for similar services, such as acquisition planning, contract administration, and strategic sourcing support. Federal procurement support contracts can range significantly in value, from smaller task orders to multi-billion dollar indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicles. Given the duration and the fact it was a delivery order under a larger contract (implied by the structure), this value appears moderate. However, without knowing the specific scope, deliverables, and the number of personnel or hours involved, a precise comparison is difficult. Contracts for high-level strategic acquisition consulting or large-scale program management could easily exceed this value, while simpler administrative support contracts might be lower.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate EAI Corporation's performance on this contract?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate EAI Corporation's performance under this contract. Typically, federal contracts include a Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW) that outlines specific deliverables, service levels, and quality standards. Performance is often assessed through contractor performance evaluation reports (CPARS). Common KPIs for procurement support might include timeliness of deliverables, accuracy of reports, adherence to budget, successful contract closeouts, and client satisfaction. Without access to the contract's SOW or performance evaluations, it is impossible to detail the specific KPIs for this award.
What is the historical spending pattern for procurement and acquisition support services within the Department of the Army?
Historical spending on procurement and acquisition support services within the Department of the Army is substantial and fluctuates based on defense budgets, operational tempo, and specific acquisition programs. The Army consistently spends billions of dollars annually on a wide array of services to support its complex acquisition lifecycle, from research and development to sustainment. This includes contracting for program management, systems engineering, logistics support, and specialized acquisition expertise. The specific category of 'procurement and acquisition support' is broad, encompassing numerous contract types and service providers. Analyzing historical spending requires examining detailed budget appropriations and contract databases, looking at trends in service contracts, consulting, and professional support over multiple fiscal years to identify patterns and significant investments.
Does EAI Corporation have a track record of performance on similar federal contracts, and what is their overall performance rating?
The provided data indicates EAI Corporation was awarded this contract. To assess their track record, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for past performance information. CPARS reports provide ratings on contractor performance, management, cost control, and compliance for completed federal contracts. Without accessing these external systems, it's impossible to definitively state EAI Corporation's track record or overall performance rating on similar federal contracts. A positive performance history on prior contracts would generally indicate a lower risk for this current award.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers › Other Miscellaneous Durable Goods Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1308 CONTINENTAL DRIVE, ABINGDON, MD, 21009
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: M6700404D0039
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-12-08
Current End Date: 2010-09-30
Potential End Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-04
More Contracts from EAI Corporation
- Training Support — $140.8M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Managerial Services — $33.9M (Department of Defense)
- Upgrade Analytical Laboratory System — $29.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200309!000657!2100!AD13 !USA Materiel Command Acquisition!daad1303c0042 !A!N! !N! !20030530!20040430!042217141!042217141!042217141!n!eai Corporation !1308 Continental Drive !abingdon !md!21009!00200!025!24!abingdon !harford !maryland !+000000827160!n!n!000004842111!b541!defense Studies !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!1000!not Discernable or Classified !541690!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!d!n!j!1!001!n!1g!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !b!b!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $28.6M (Department of Defense)
- 200606!009953!1700!m67004!commander !M6700404D0039 !A!N! !N!0030 ! !20060314!20060930!042217141!042217141!042217141!n!eai Corporation !1308 Continental Drive !abingdon !md!21009!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000012222742!n!n!000000000000!r707!contract, Procurement & Acquisition Support Svcs !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541990!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!u!y!2!009!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! !1727!N00052!0001! ! — $21.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)