DoD's $51.7M Eielson AFB Housing Project: Firm Fixed Price Contract Awarded to Lakeshore Engineering Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,711,166 ($51.7M)

Contractor: Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-08-28

End Date: 2011-10-31

Contract Duration: 794 days

Daily Burn Rate: $65.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TAS::57 3404::TAS RECOVERYPROJECT#::FTQWO94001::RP# REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS AT EIELSON AFB, AK

Place of Performance

Location: EIELSON AFB, FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR County, ALASKA, 99702

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $51.7 million to LAKESHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. for work described as: TAS::57 3404::TAS RECOVERYPROJECT#::FTQWO94001::RP# REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS AT EIELSON AFB, AK Key points: 1. The project involved replacing military family housing units at Eielson Air Force Base, Alaska. 2. Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. was awarded the contract. 3. The contract type was Firm Fixed Price, indicating a set price for the work. 4. The project duration was 794 days, with an award date of August 28, 2009, and an end date of October 31, 2011.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $51.7 million for replacing military housing units is a significant investment. Without specific benchmarks for similar construction projects in remote Alaskan locations, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the firm fixed price structure suggests an attempt to control costs upfront.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which implies a limited competition. This method may have restricted the pool of potential bidders, potentially impacting price discovery and overall cost-effectiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of limited competition could have resulted in a higher price than if full and open competition had been utilized, potentially impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Ensured adequate housing for military families stationed at Eielson AFB. Supported the local economy in Alaska through construction activities. The project aimed to improve living conditions for service members and their families.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector by the DoD can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs and modernization efforts. Benchmarks for military housing construction in remote areas are highly variable.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary consideration for this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. This suggests that larger firms were likely involved, potentially limiting opportunities for small businesses in this specific procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would have been crucial during the construction phase to ensure quality, adherence to schedule, and budget control, especially given the remote location and firm fixed price nature of the contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ak, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $51.7 million to LAKESHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC.. TAS::57 3404::TAS RECOVERYPROJECT#::FTQWO94001::RP# REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING UNITS AT EIELSON AFB, AK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LAKESHORE ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-08-28. End: 2011-10-31.

What was the justification for excluding sources in the full and open competition?

The justification for excluding sources in the full and open competition is not detailed in the provided data. Typically, such exclusions are based on specific technical requirements, unique capabilities, or urgent needs that only a limited number of contractors can meet. Further investigation into the contract's award documentation would be necessary to understand the precise rationale.

How did the limited competition impact the final cost compared to a fully open bid?

It is difficult to definitively quantify the cost impact of limited competition without a comparative analysis against a hypothetical full and open bid. However, limited competition generally reduces the number of bidders, potentially leading to less aggressive pricing. The firm fixed price structure aims to mitigate cost overruns, but the initial price might have been higher due to reduced competitive pressure.

Were there any performance issues or cost overruns despite the firm fixed price contract?

The provided data does not contain information regarding performance issues or cost overruns. A firm fixed price contract is designed to place the risk of cost overruns on the contractor. However, contract modifications, change orders, or disputes can still arise, impacting the final cost and project timeline. A review of contract modification history would be needed for a complete picture.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7310 WOODWARD AVENUE, FIFT, DETROIT, MI, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,711,166

Exercised Options: $51,711,166

Current Obligation: $51,711,166

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA890306D8505

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-08-28

Current End Date: 2011-10-31

Potential End Date: 2011-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-08-26

More Contracts from Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc.

View all Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending