DoD's $91.8M Contract for Military Analysts Awarded to Foreign Entities Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $91,830,118 ($91.8M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-01-10
End Date: 2011-02-09
Contract Duration: 760 days
Daily Burn Rate: $120.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: MILITARY ANALYSTS (MA)
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $91.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: MILITARY ANALYSTS (MA) Key points: 1. Significant spending on specialized consulting services for military analysis. 2. Competition was open, but awardees were foreign, raising potential geopolitical considerations. 3. Contract value is substantial, necessitating careful oversight of deliverables and performance. 4. The sector involves critical administrative and management consulting for defense operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $91.8M over two years for administrative management consulting is high. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without more specific service details, but the scale suggests a need for strong justification.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad solicitation. However, the award to 'MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES' suggests a potentially fragmented or less competitive landscape than anticipated, impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being utilized for specialized consulting services. The use of foreign awardees may have implications for domestic job creation and economic benefit, though competition aims for best value.
Public Impact
Potential impact on domestic consulting firms' ability to secure defense contracts. Questions regarding the strategic implications of relying on foreign entities for sensitive military analysis. Ensuring the quality and effectiveness of services provided by foreign awardees is crucial for mission success.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Reliance on foreign awardees for critical military analysis.
- Lack of specific detail on the 'miscellaneous' nature of foreign awardees.
- Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, maximizing potential for competitive pricing.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type limits financial risk to the government.
- Contract duration is defined, allowing for periodic performance reviews.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative and management consulting. Spending in this area for defense is common, but the scale and foreign awardees warrant scrutiny.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no specific set-aside for small businesses, and the awardees are described as 'miscellaneous foreign awardees,' suggesting small businesses were likely not the primary focus or beneficiaries of this particular contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is critical given the substantial value and foreign awardees. The Department of the Army must ensure robust performance monitoring and accountability mechanisms are in place to validate the necessity and effectiveness of these consulting services.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Geopolitical risks associated with foreign awardees.
- Potential lack of transparency in 'miscellaneous foreign awardees'.
- Ensuring data security and intellectual property protection with foreign contractors.
- Difficulty in verifying the qualifications and performance of numerous small foreign entities.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $91.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. MILITARY ANALYSTS (MA)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $91.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-01-10. End: 2011-02-09.
What specific military analysis tasks were performed under this contract, and how did they directly contribute to national security objectives?
The contract focused on administrative management and general management consulting services for military analysts. While the exact tasks are not detailed, such services typically involve strategic planning, operational efficiency improvements, data analysis, and policy support. These functions are crucial for informing military decision-making, optimizing resource allocation, and enhancing overall defense capabilities, thereby directly contributing to national security objectives by improving the effectiveness and efficiency of military operations.
What were the key factors that led to the award being given to 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' despite full and open competition?
The designation 'miscellaneous foreign awardees' suggests that multiple foreign entities, possibly small or specialized firms, collectively met the requirements of the solicitation. Factors could include unique expertise, cost-effectiveness, or a lack of sufficient domestic bids meeting specific technical criteria. Full and open competition aims to find the best value, and in this instance, foreign entities collectively offered the most advantageous solution, potentially due to specialized skills or pricing not readily available domestically.
How was the value for money assessed and ensured for a $91.8 million contract awarded to foreign entities for consulting services?
Value for money was likely assessed through a combination of technical merit, past performance, and price. The firm-fixed-price contract type inherently aims to control costs. The government would have evaluated proposals against defined criteria, ensuring the selected foreign awardees offered the best overall value proposition. Ongoing performance monitoring and deliverables verification would be crucial to ensure the services rendered justified the significant expenditure and met the intended military analysis objectives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $113,730,118
Exercised Options: $113,730,118
Current Obligation: $91,830,118
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W91GER06D0007
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-01-10
Current End Date: 2011-02-09
Potential End Date: 2011-02-09 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-11-20
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)