DoD's $188.8M Security Support Services Contract Awarded to Foreign Entities Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $188,832,951 ($188.8M)

Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-02-01

End Date: 2008-07-16

Contract Duration: 166 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1M/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: {PIIN: W91GDW07D4021} RECONSTRUCTION SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (RSSS)

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $188.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GDW07D4021} RECONSTRUCTION SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (RSSS) Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $188.8 million, was awarded for Reconstruction Security Support Services (RSSS). 2. Competition was full and open, indicating a broad solicitation process. 3. The award went to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', raising questions about specific vendor capabilities and oversight. 4. The sector is administrative and general management consulting services, a broad category.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $188.8 million for a 166-day duration is substantial. Without specific deliverables or comparable contracts for similar security support services in foreign reconstruction zones, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. The firm fixed-price structure aims to control costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting multiple bids were considered. However, the award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' might indicate a lack of specific domestic or well-known international contractors for this niche service, potentially impacting price discovery and vendor vetting.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for security support services in a foreign context. While competition aims for efficiency, the broad nature of the awardee category warrants scrutiny to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Significant taxpayer investment in foreign security operations. Potential for complex logistical and geopolitical considerations due to foreign awardees. Need for robust oversight to ensure service delivery and accountability. Impact on domestic job creation is likely minimal given foreign awardees.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Awardee ambiguity ('Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees')
Lack of specific service details
Foreign operational context

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract type
Full and open competition

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611). Spending in this sector can vary widely based on the specific services required. For security support in complex foreign environments, costs are typically higher due to risk and logistical challenges.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees', indicating no direct benefit or opportunity for U.S. small businesses in this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Given the foreign awardees and the nature of security support services, robust oversight mechanisms are crucial. This includes monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and verifying the legitimacy and capabilities of the awarded entities to prevent misuse of funds.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Ambiguity in awardee identity
Potential for less stringent vetting of foreign entities
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data
Geopolitical and operational risks associated with foreign deployment

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $188.8 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GDW07D4021} RECONSTRUCTION SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES (RSSS)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $188.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-02-01. End: 2008-07-16.

What specific security support services were rendered under this contract, and how did the 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' demonstrate capability to perform them effectively in the designated operati

The contract PIIN W91GDW07D4021 for Reconstruction Security Support Services (RSSS) was awarded to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' for $188.8 million. Specific details on the exact services provided are not detailed in the provided data. However, the nature of RSSS typically involves physical security, personnel security, and potentially security consulting for reconstruction projects in potentially unstable regions. The capability demonstration by these foreign awardees would have been assessed during the full and open competition phase, though the broad categorization raises questions about the vetting process.

What were the key factors that led to the award being made to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' rather than more established domestic or international security firms, and did this impact the overall co

The decision to award to 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' under full and open competition suggests that these entities either offered the most competitive proposals based on price and stated capabilities, or that established firms did not bid or meet the specific requirements for this niche service. Without further details on the bidding process, it's difficult to definitively state the impact on cost-effectiveness. However, the broad classification could imply a less transparent or competitive landscape than anticipated.

How was the effectiveness of the security support services measured, and what mechanisms were in place to ensure accountability from 'Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees' given the potential complexities o

Effectiveness measurement and accountability for contracts with foreign awardees typically rely on rigorous performance metrics defined in the contract, regular reporting requirements, and on-site government oversight. For RSSS, metrics might include incident response times, security breaches prevented, and personnel adherence to protocols. Accountability mechanisms would involve contractual remedies for non-performance, payment withholding, and potentially legal recourse, though enforcing these internationally can present challenges.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $188,832,951

Exercised Options: $188,832,951

Current Obligation: $188,832,951

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W91GDW07D4021

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline