DoD's Army awards $27.5M contract for consulting services to Grant Thornton LLP under full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,483,031 ($27.5M)
Contractor: Grant Thornton LLP
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2013-09-30
End Date: 2018-03-31
Contract Duration: 1,643 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.7K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: BASE PERIOD LABOR (INCLUDING TRANS-IN)
Place of Performance
Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $27.5 million to GRANT THORNTON LLP for work described as: BASE PERIOD LABOR (INCLUDING TRANS-IN) Key points: 1. The contract value is $27.5 million for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Grant Thornton LLP was awarded the contract through full and open competition. 3. The contract spans from September 30, 2013, to March 31, 2018, with a duration of 1643 days. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns. 5. The award was made by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar consulting contracts is difficult without detailed scope of work and performance metrics.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure may still allow for costs to exceed initial expectations.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for consulting services, with the ultimate impact depending on the value and efficiency of the services rendered.
Public Impact
Consulting services are essential for government efficiency but can be costly. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for these services. Transparency in the use of funds and the effectiveness of the consulting services are key for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition
- Awarded to a reputable firm
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under professional services, specifically management consulting. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs and economic conditions. Benchmarks are difficult without specific service details.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is crucial for Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts to ensure costs are reasonable and services are effective. The Department of Defense typically has robust oversight mechanisms in place.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure
- Long contract duration may not reflect current needs
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data
- Limited insight into actual value delivered
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $27.5 million to GRANT THORNTON LLP. BASE PERIOD LABOR (INCLUDING TRANS-IN)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GRANT THORNTON LLP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-09-30. End: 2018-03-31.
What specific management consulting services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of the Army's mission?
The contract was for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. To assess value, one would need to examine the specific deliverables, project outcomes, and alignment with the Army's strategic objectives. Without this detailed information, it's challenging to definitively quantify the value beyond the contractual agreement.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for Grant Thornton LLP, and how was their performance measured to justify the Cost Plus Fixed Fee?
Performance metrics for consulting contracts, especially CPFF, typically involve adherence to timelines, quality of deliverables, and achievement of agreed-upon objectives. The effectiveness of oversight in monitoring these KPIs and ensuring cost control is paramount. The specific KPIs and their impact on the final cost would require access to contract performance reports.
How did the full and open competition process ensure the best value was obtained for the taxpayer, considering the CPFF contract type?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize the pool of potential bidders, fostering a competitive environment that theoretically drives down prices and improves quality. However, the CPFF structure introduces inherent cost uncertainty. The effectiveness of the competition in securing best value hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the government's ability to negotiate favorable fee structures and manage costs post-award.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W81XWH05R0004
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Grant Thornton International Ltd (UEI: 347201258)
Address: 333 JOHN CARLYLE ST STE 500, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,879,767
Exercised Options: $27,483,331
Current Obligation: $27,483,031
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W81XWH08D0027
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-09-30
Current End Date: 2018-03-31
Potential End Date: 2018-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-09-28
More Contracts from Grant Thornton LLP
- THE Contractor Shall Provide Financial Support Services and CIO Support Services — $66.8M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Procurement Assistance Program — $65.1M (Department of Defense)
- ,Ct::igf Professional Services for the Customs and Border Protection Investment Analysis Office (IAO) — $40.2M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Program Management and Technical Support Services for the Unified Financial Management System (ufms) Program Management Office (PMO) — $39.2M (Department of Justice)
- Enterprise Data Warehouse (EDW) — $37.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)