Army awards $98.6M for tactical radio systems training to Engineering Solutions & Products LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $98,603,244 ($98.6M)

Contractor: Engineering Solutions & Products LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-07-31

End Date: 2011-12-30

Contract Duration: 1,613 days

Daily Burn Rate: $61.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: AWARD NEW TASK ORDER FOR U.S. ARMY C-E LCMC, DIRECTORATE FOR READINESS, FORCE MODERNIZATION DIVISION TOTAL PACKAGE FIELDING AND NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT MANAGER TACTICAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.

Place of Performance

Location: EATONTOWN, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07724, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $98.6 million to ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS & PRODUCTS LLC for work described as: AWARD NEW TASK ORDER FOR U.S. ARMY C-E LCMC, DIRECTORATE FOR READINESS, FORCE MODERNIZATION DIVISION TOTAL PACKAGE FIELDING AND NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT MANAGER TACTICAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS. Key points: 1. The award focuses on critical field support and training for tactical radio communications systems. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is over 4 years, indicating a significant, long-term need. 4. The sector is primarily engineering services supporting defense modernization.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $98.6 million for a 4-year period appears reasonable for specialized engineering and training services in the defense sector. Benchmarking against similar large-scale training and fielding contracts would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives best value.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being utilized efficiently through a market-driven pricing approach.

Public Impact

Ensures U.S. Army personnel receive essential training on advanced tactical radio systems. Supports the modernization and readiness of critical communication infrastructure. Contributes to the operational effectiveness of soldiers in the field. The award highlights the ongoing investment in defense technology and training.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns in Time and Materials contracts if not closely managed.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical training and fielding.
Scope creep could increase the final cost beyond initial estimates.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition likely secured competitive pricing.
Focus on essential readiness and modernization aligns with strategic goals.
Contractor has a defined role in critical defense systems.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically supporting defense communications and modernization. Spending in this area is substantial, driven by the need for advanced technological capabilities and ongoing soldier training to maintain operational readiness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award, though subcontractors could potentially be involved.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense, which has established oversight mechanisms for major acquisitions. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure necessitates diligent monitoring to control costs and prevent scope creep.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Long contract duration increases the risk of technology obsolescence or changing requirements.
Lack of small business participation limits broader economic impact.
Potential for vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is concentrated.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical training and fielding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $98.6 million to ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS & PRODUCTS LLC. AWARD NEW TASK ORDER FOR U.S. ARMY C-E LCMC, DIRECTORATE FOR READINESS, FORCE MODERNIZATION DIVISION TOTAL PACKAGE FIELDING AND NEW EQUIPMENT TRAINING IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT MANAGER TACTICAL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS & PRODUCTS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $98.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-07-31. End: 2011-12-30.

What is the projected cost per training hour or per soldier trained, and how does this compare to industry benchmarks for similar defense training programs?

Without specific breakdowns of training hours or soldier numbers, calculating a precise per-unit cost is not possible from the provided data. However, the total award of $98.6 million over approximately 4 years suggests a significant investment. Benchmarking would require detailed cost data from comparable defense training contracts to assess efficiency and value for money.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will the Army measure the effectiveness of the training and fielding support provided by Engineering Solutions & Products LLC?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Effective measurement would likely involve metrics such as trainee proficiency rates, successful system fielding timelines, reduction in equipment malfunctions post-training, and overall soldier feedback. The Army's Directorate for Readiness and PM Tactical Radio Communications Systems would be responsible for defining and monitoring these KPIs.

Are there any identified risks associated with the specific tactical radio communication systems being supported, and how does this contract mitigate those risks through training and fielding?

The data does not detail specific risks associated with the tactical radio systems themselves. However, the contract's focus on 'Total Package Fielding and New Equipment Training' directly addresses the risk of operational failure due to improper use or maintenance. By ensuring soldiers are well-trained and systems are properly fielded, the contract aims to maximize system reliability and effectiveness in the field.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14566 LEE RD, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $122,690,997

Exercised Options: $98,603,244

Current Obligation: $98,603,244

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W15P7T06DE406

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline