DoD's $20.6M Enterprise Mission Support Services contract awarded to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC for technical services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $20,570,880 ($20.6M)

Contractor: Calibre Systems Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-09-30

End Date: 2013-12-30

Contract Duration: 822 days

Daily Burn Rate: $25.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TSS ENTERPRISE MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96857

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $20.6 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC for work described as: TSS ENTERPRISE MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $20.6 million over approximately 2.7 years. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541990 indicates 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services'. 5. The contract was awarded as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. 6. The contractor, CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, has a track record with federal contracts. 7. The contract was awarded to a single entity, CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. 8. The contract duration is 822 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total contract value of $20.6 million over 822 days averages to approximately $25,000 per day. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, it is difficult to benchmark the value for money. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for the government if the contractor is experienced and efficient. Further analysis would require understanding the scope of 'Enterprise Mission Support Services'.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition', indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 4 bidders (implied by 'no': 4) suggests a moderate level of competition. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a market-driven price. It provides taxpayers with confidence that the government sought the best value available.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Army, receiving mission support services. The services delivered are broadly categorized as 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services', suggesting a wide range of potential support functions. The contract was awarded in Hawaii, indicating a geographic focus for service delivery. The contract may have implications for the workforce in Hawaii, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in professional and technical services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The professional, scientific, and technical services sector is a significant part of the federal procurement landscape. This contract falls under the broad category of technical support services, which are essential for various government operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific nature of the 'mission support' provided, but the overall federal spending in this sector is in the tens of billions annually. This contract represents a small fraction of that total.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have been set aside for small businesses, nor is there an indication of specific small business subcontracting requirements mentioned in the provided data. The award to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC, a mid-sized to large contractor, suggests that small business participation might be limited unless subcontracting opportunities arise from the prime contractor. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program office within the Department of the Army. As a delivery order under a larger contract, oversight mechanisms would be tied to the parent IDIQ contract's structure. Transparency is moderate, as the award is publicly available, but detailed performance reports or specific oversight activities are not provided. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, hawaii, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, enterprise-mission-support, calibre-systems-inc, mid-size-contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $20.6 million to CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC. TSS ENTERPRISE MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $20.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-30. End: 2013-12-30.

What specific services fall under 'Enterprise Mission Support Services' for the Department of the Army in Hawaii?

The provided data categorizes this contract under NAICS code 541990, 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.' This broad classification suggests a wide range of potential support functions, which could include areas such as program management, administrative support, logistical assistance, technical consulting, data analysis, or specialized operational support tailored to the Army's mission in Hawaii. Without access to the specific Statement of Work (SOW) or contract line item numbers (CLINs), the precise nature of these services remains undefined. Typically, 'mission support' encompasses activities that enable the primary mission of an organization to be carried out effectively and efficiently, freeing up core personnel for mission-critical tasks.

How does the $20.6 million contract value compare to similar mission support contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

Benchmarking this $20.6 million contract requires comparing it to similar 'mission support' or 'professional, scientific, and technical services' contracts awarded by the Department of the Army, particularly those with similar durations and scopes. Given the broad NAICS code, direct comparisons are challenging. However, federal spending databases indicate that contracts for professional and technical services for the DoD can range from a few million to hundreds of millions of dollars. The value of this contract appears to be in the mid-range for a specific geographic location like Hawaii, especially considering its duration of approximately 2.7 years. A more precise comparison would necessitate identifying contracts with identical or highly overlapping SOWs.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC under this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate CALIBRE SYSTEMS INC's performance. For a Firm Fixed Price contract, performance is typically assessed against the requirements outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). Success would likely be measured by the contractor's ability to deliver the specified services on time, within budget (as defined by the fixed price), and to the required quality standards. Common metrics in such contracts might include adherence to delivery schedules, accuracy of reports, responsiveness to requests, and overall client satisfaction as determined by the government's technical point of contact or contracting officer's representative (COR).

What is the historical spending pattern for 'Enterprise Mission Support Services' by the Department of the Army in Hawaii?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for 'Enterprise Mission Support Services' by the Department of the Army in Hawaii requires accessing historical contract data beyond this single award. This specific contract, valued at $20.6 million over 822 days, represents a snapshot. To understand historical trends, one would need to aggregate spending data for similar services (using relevant NAICS codes and keywords) awarded by the Army in Hawaii over several fiscal years. This would reveal whether spending in this category has been consistent, increasing, or decreasing, and identify other major contractors or contract vehicles utilized for such services in the region.

What is the risk associated with a Firm Fixed Price contract for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services'?

The primary risk associated with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract, especially for services that can be somewhat undefined (like 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services'), is the potential for scope creep. While FFP shifts cost risk to the contractor, if the government's needs evolve or the initial SOW was not sufficiently detailed, the contractor may be incentivized to perform additional work without a corresponding price adjustment, or conversely, may cut corners to maintain profitability. The government's risk lies in ensuring the SOW is comprehensive and in diligently managing contract modifications to prevent unauthorized work or ensure fair pricing for any necessary changes. Effective oversight and clear communication are crucial to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: W911S010R0008

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6354 WALKER LN STE 300, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22310

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $20,570,880

Exercised Options: $20,570,880

Current Obligation: $20,570,880

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W911S011D0046

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-09-30

Current End Date: 2013-12-30

Potential End Date: 2013-12-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-07-08

More Contracts from Calibre Systems Inc

View all Calibre Systems Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending