DoD's $39.9M Motion Picture Contract Awarded to Engility Corporation Under Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $39,942,749 ($39.9M)
Contractor: Engility Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-06-13
End Date: 2008-06-12
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $109.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)
Sector: Other
Official Description: TRAVEL, MATERIAL AND ODC
Place of Performance
Location: TAMPA, HILLSBOROUGH County, FLORIDA, 33621
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $39.9 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION for work described as: TRAVEL, MATERIAL AND ODC Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in visual information services for special operations. 2. Full and open competition suggests a potentially competitive bidding process, which can drive better pricing. 3. The contract duration of one year with a combination type indicates flexibility in service delivery. 4. Awarded to Engility Corporation, a known entity in government contracting, suggesting established capabilities. 5. The NAICS code 512110 points to a specific niche within the motion picture and video production industry. 6. Geographic location in Florida may indicate specific production needs or resource availability. 7. The absence of small business set-aside flags this as a large-scale procurement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this specific contract is challenging without comparable data for motion picture and video production services for U.S. Special Operations Command. The raw dollar amount of $39.9 million is substantial, but its value for money depends heavily on the scope, quality, and impact of the produced content. Without detailed performance metrics or comparisons to similar projects, assessing the true value is difficult. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which theoretically should lead to competitive pricing, but the specific per-unit costs or pricing structure are not detailed here.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 8 bidders suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of technical solutions, benefiting the government by potentially securing better value and innovation.
Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition in this procurement process is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely drove down costs and ensured the government received competitive offers for the motion picture and video production services.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are likely U.S. Special Operations Command, which receives visual documentation and potentially training or informational materials. Services delivered include motion picture and video production, crucial for operational documentation, training, public affairs, or historical archiving. The geographic impact is primarily within Florida, where the contract was administered, though the content produced may have global relevance for SOCOM. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for professionals in the film and video production industry, potentially including specialized technical roles.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and quality of the produced content.
- The specific use cases for the motion picture and video production are not clearly defined, raising questions about strategic alignment.
- Limited information on the contractor's specific experience in defense-related motion picture production.
- The one-year duration might suggest a project-based need rather than an ongoing requirement, potentially leading to discontinuity.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a fair and transparent procurement process.
- Multiple bidders (8) participated, suggesting a competitive market for these services.
- Engility Corporation is an established government contractor, implying a degree of reliability and experience.
- The contract addresses a specific need within the Department of Defense for visual media production.
Sector Analysis
The motion picture and video production sector is a dynamic industry that supports various government functions, including intelligence, training, public relations, and historical documentation. Within the federal landscape, spending on such services can fluctuate based on agency priorities and specific mission requirements. This contract, valued at nearly $40 million, represents a significant investment in specialized visual content creation for a critical defense agency. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more granular data on the specific types of productions and their intended use.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. The award to Engility Corporation, a large prime contractor, suggests that the primary focus was on securing specialized capabilities from a large-scale provider. This means that the direct economic impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific procurement is likely minimal, unless Engility independently engages small businesses as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the U.S. Special Operations Command's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be tied to the contract's performance work statement, delivery schedules, and quality standards. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being publicly available, but detailed project specifics and performance reviews are often not disclosed for national security reasons. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Visual Information Services
- Special Operations Command Support Contracts
- Motion Picture and Video Production Services
- Government Media Production Contracts
Risk Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics
- Unclear strategic purpose of content
- Limited public information on specific deliverables
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, u.s.-special-operations-command, motion-picture-and-video-production, full-and-open-competition, large-contract, engility-corporation, florida, information-services, visual-media
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $39.9 million to ENGILITY CORPORATION. TRAVEL, MATERIAL AND ODC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ENGILITY CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (U.S. Special Operations Command).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $39.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-06-13. End: 2008-06-12.
What specific types of motion picture and video content were produced under this contract, and for what primary purposes?
The provided data indicates the contract was for 'Motion Picture and Video Production' under NAICS code 512110, awarded to Engility Corporation by the U.S. Special Operations Command. However, the specific types of content (e.g., documentaries, training videos, operational footage, public affairs materials) and their primary purposes (e.g., intelligence gathering, historical archiving, personnel training, public outreach) are not detailed in the summary data. This information would typically be found in the contract's statement of work or performance work statement, which are not publicly available in this context. Understanding the specific deliverables is crucial for assessing the contract's strategic value and impact.
How does the $39.9 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar visual information services by U.S. Special Operations Command?
Direct comparison of this $39.9 million contract to historical spending is difficult without access to detailed historical procurement data for U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) specifically for motion picture and video production. SOCOM's needs can be highly specialized and vary significantly year to year based on operational tempo and strategic priorities. While Engility Corporation is a known contractor, the value of this specific award needs to be contextualized against previous SOCOM investments in similar services. A trend analysis over several years would reveal whether this represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment in visual information capabilities.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and did Engility Corporation meet them?
The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or performance assessment details for this contract. Typically, government contracts outline specific metrics related to quality, timeliness, and scope of deliverables. For a motion picture and video production contract, KPIs might include adherence to production schedules, quality of final output (e.g., resolution, editing standards), content accuracy, and successful delivery of all specified media assets. Without access to the contract's performance work statement and subsequent performance reviews, it is impossible to determine if Engility Corporation met its contractual obligations or how its performance was evaluated.
What is Engility Corporation's track record with defense contracts, particularly in media production?
Engility Corporation (now part of SAIC) has a significant track record with various U.S. federal agencies, including the Department of Defense. While their broader portfolio often includes IT services, engineering, and program management, they have also been involved in providing support services that could encompass media production or related technical support. Specific details on their expertise and past performance solely within the niche of defense-related motion picture and video production for entities like U.S. Special Operations Command would require a deeper dive into their contract history and project portfolios. Their status as a large, established contractor suggests they possess the organizational capacity and potentially the necessary clearances for such work.
Given the 'full and open competition' and 8 bidders, what was the estimated cost savings or price reduction achieved compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario?
While the data confirms 'full and open competition' with 8 bidders, it does not provide the specific data needed to calculate estimated cost savings or price reductions compared to alternative competition levels. In theory, a higher number of bidders in a full and open competition drives down prices through market forces. To quantify savings, one would need to compare the awarded price against a baseline, such as the government's independent government cost estimate (IGCE), or against prices from sole-source negotiations or a limited competition scenario for a similar scope of work. Without these comparative figures, the precise financial benefit to taxpayers from the competitive process remains unquantified, though it is presumed to be positive.
What is the strategic importance of motion picture and video production for U.S. Special Operations Command, justifying a nearly $40 million investment?
The strategic importance of motion picture and video production for U.S. Special Operations Command (SOCOM) likely stems from its critical role in operational documentation, intelligence gathering, training, historical archiving, and public affairs. SOCOM units often operate in complex and sensitive environments where high-quality visual media is essential for mission debriefs, after-action reviews, evidence collection, and disseminating information to relevant stakeholders. Furthermore, video content is invaluable for realistic training simulations and for communicating SOCOM's capabilities and missions to policymakers and the public. A nearly $40 million investment suggests a significant, ongoing need for sophisticated visual storytelling and documentation capabilities tailored to the unique demands of special operations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Information › Motion Picture and Video Industries › Motion Picture and Video Production
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: H9222205R0008
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 008898843)
Address: 241 18TH ST S STE 900, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $39,942,749
Exercised Options: $39,942,749
Current Obligation: $39,942,749
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: H9222205D0012
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-06-13
Current End Date: 2008-06-12
Potential End Date: 2008-06-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-07-14
More Contracts from Engility Corporation
- IT Support for Network Operation and Security Center for Usafcent — $150.8M (General Services Administration)
- [piin: W912cm-05-D-0011-0011] Migrated Award & Mods UP to 0005 — $121.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $113.5M (Department of Defense)
- 200303!000021!1700!A8305 !naval AIR Warfare Center Trainin!n6133900d0032 !A!N! !N!0003 !20021203!20040614!177153319!008898884!008898843!N!L-3 Communications Government !3750 Centerview Drive !chantilly !va!20151!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000039861464!n!n!000000000000!6930!operational Training Devices !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!2afx!f-18 Hornet !333319!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !n!z!a!u!m!2!002!b! !Z!N!F! ! !n!b!y!n! ! !Z! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $91.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000084!5700!GV68 !esc/Ack !gs35f5396h !C!N! !N!F1962802F8162 !20020409!20040131!081080707!011147928!048341838!n!the Titan Corporation !1900 Campus Commons Drive !reston !va!20191!01375!037!24!andover Estates !ST. Mary S !maryland !+000011005449!n!n!000000000000!r499!other Professional Services !A7 !electronics and Communication !3000!NOT Discernable or Classified !334290!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !y!c!n!n! ! ! ! ! ! !* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $86.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)