DoD's $95.4M Management Consulting Contract Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $95,405,070 ($95.4M)
Contractor: Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-02-18
End Date: 2010-03-07
Contract Duration: 748 days
Daily Burn Rate: $127.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: {PIIN: W91GER06D0006} SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT CONTRACT
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $95.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES for work described as: {PIIN: W91GER06D0006} SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract Value: $95.4 million over 748 days. 2. Competition: Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Risk: Low risk due to fixed-price contract type and established competition. 4. Sector: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting).
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $95.4 million for a 748-day period suggests a reasonable rate for specialized consulting services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale management consulting contracts would provide a more precise assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value. The specific pricing discovery mechanisms within this competitive process are not detailed.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to more efficient use of taxpayer funds by driving down prices through market forces.
Public Impact
Supports Department of the Army operations with essential management consulting. Potential for improved administrative efficiency and strategic planning. Contract duration of approximately two years allows for sustained support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition
- Firm fixed price contract
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically Administrative Management and General Management Consulting. Spending in this area is common for government agencies seeking expert advice on operational efficiency and strategic direction.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside or requirement for this contract. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small businesses were involved as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of full and open competition suggests a standard procurement process. Oversight would focus on contract performance, deliverables, and adherence to the firm fixed-price terms.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Contract duration is relatively long (748 days), requiring sustained oversight.
- Lack of specific small business participation noted.
- Details on specific performance metrics and outcomes are not provided.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $95.4 million to MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES. {PIIN: W91GER06D0006} SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MISCELLANEOUS FOREIGN AWARDEES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $95.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-02-18. End: 2010-03-07.
What specific management challenges did this contract aim to address for the Department of the Army?
The contract aimed to provide expert administrative management and general management consulting services to the Department of the Army. This could encompass a wide range of areas, such as improving organizational efficiency, developing strategic plans, optimizing resource allocation, or implementing new management practices to enhance overall operational effectiveness and support military readiness.
How does the firm fixed-price structure mitigate cost overrun risks for taxpayers?
A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract establishes a ceiling price that the contractor must adhere to, regardless of their actual costs. This structure shifts the risk of cost overruns from the government to the contractor. If the contractor incurs higher expenses than anticipated, their profit margin decreases, but the government's payment remains fixed, thereby protecting taxpayer funds from unexpected increases.
What is the expected impact of these consulting services on the Army's operational effectiveness?
The expected impact is enhanced operational effectiveness through improved management practices and strategic guidance. By leveraging external expertise, the Army can identify inefficiencies, refine processes, and implement best practices in administrative and general management. This can lead to better resource utilization, more informed decision-making, and ultimately, a stronger capacity to fulfill its mission objectives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: MISCELLANEOUS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2011 CRYSTAL DR STE 911, ARLINGTON, VA, 08
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $95,405,070
Exercised Options: $95,405,070
Current Obligation: $95,405,070
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W91GER06D0006
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-02-18
Current End Date: 2010-03-07
Potential End Date: 2010-03-07 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-04-13
More Contracts from Miscellaneous Foreign Awardees
- Additional Services Mca-Funded — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W27p4a05c0002} Bottled Water — $480.1M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gy007c0053} Rule of LAW — $372.4M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gdw07d4021} Reconstruction Security Support Services (rsss) — $188.8M (Department of Defense)
- {piin: W91gxy06c0094} AL Qudas GAS Turbine Expansion — $169.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)