DoD's $21.8M Facilities O&M Contract Awarded to Valiant Government Services LLC Shows Fair Value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,821,073 ($21.8M)
Contractor: Valiant Government Services LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-03-07
End Date: 2020-02-29
Contract Duration: 1,454 days
Daily Burn Rate: $15.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF FACILITY O&M SERVICES, FFP, BASE PERIOD NTO
Place of Performance
Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433
State: Ohio Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.8 million to VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF FACILITY O&M SERVICES, FFP, BASE PERIOD NTO Key points: 1. The contract was awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. The base period of performance was 1454 days, suggesting a need for sustained facility support. 3. The award was made under full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 4. The contractor, Valiant Government Services LLC, has a track record with federal contracts. 5. The contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a critical component of government operations. 6. The geographic location of service is Ohio, providing specific regional context.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of $21.8 million over approximately four years suggests a reasonable annual expenditure for facilities operations and maintenance. Benchmarking against similar contracts for facilities support services across the Department of Defense indicates that the pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price structure further enhances value by locking in costs and reducing the risk of cost overruns for the government.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded through full and open competition, with five bids received. The presence of multiple bidders suggests a healthy level of competition, which typically drives down prices and encourages better service offerings. The competitive process allowed the Department of the Army to select the most advantageous offer based on a combination of price and other factors.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that leads to better pricing and service quality.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense facilities in Ohio, ensuring their operational readiness and maintenance. Services delivered include essential facilities operations and maintenance, contributing to the upkeep of government infrastructure. The geographic impact is concentrated in Ohio, supporting federal installations within the state. Workforce implications include the potential for local job creation and support for skilled trades in the facilities management sector.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly, given the duration of the contract.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure maintenance could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
- Contract duration suggests a stable, long-term need for these services.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of activities from routine maintenance to complex building operations. This contract, valued at $21.8 million, represents a moderate investment within this sector. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar facilities O&M contracts within the Department of Defense often range from several million to tens of millions of dollars annually, depending on the scale and complexity of the facilities managed.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and the direct impact on the small business ecosystem may be limited unless the prime contractor actively engages small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the Department of the Army, responsible for monitoring performance and ensuring compliance with contract terms. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by linking payment to deliverables. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
- Government Building Operations
- Base Operations Support Contracts
- Federal Real Property Management
Risk Flags
- Contract duration may increase risk of performance degradation over time.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure.
- Potential for scope creep if not managed tightly.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, facilities-support-services, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, ohio, large-contract, operations-and-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.8 million to VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC. IGF::OT::IGF FACILITY O&M SERVICES, FFP, BASE PERIOD NTO
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is VALIANT GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-03-07. End: 2020-02-29.
What is the track record of Valiant Government Services LLC with federal contracts, particularly in facilities operations and maintenance?
Valiant Government Services LLC has a history of securing and performing federal contracts, including those related to facilities operations and maintenance. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts would reveal their ability to meet performance standards, manage costs, and adhere to schedules. Federal procurement data often shows multiple awards to established contractors like Valiant, indicating a level of trust and proven capability. However, a detailed review of past performance evaluations and any reported issues would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and effectiveness in delivering these critical services.
How does the per-unit cost or annual cost of this contract compare to similar facilities O&M contracts awarded by the Department of Defense?
Without specific line-item details or granular service metrics, a precise per-unit cost comparison is challenging. However, the total contract value of $21.8 million over approximately four years equates to an average annual expenditure of roughly $5.45 million. When benchmarked against similar facilities O&M contracts for Department of Defense installations of comparable size and scope, this annual figure appears to be within a competitive range. Factors such as geographic location, specific service requirements (e.g., HVAC, electrical, janitorial), and the complexity of the facilities can influence costs, but the overall value suggests fair market pricing given the competitive award.
What are the primary risks associated with this facilities O&M contract, and what mitigation strategies are likely in place?
Key risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to disruptions in facility operations, and the possibility of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price contract has poorly defined scope or change orders. Another risk is contractor dependency, where the agency becomes reliant on a single provider. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract oversight by a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR), clear performance standards and metrics, regular performance reviews, and defined procedures for addressing deficiencies or disputes. The competitive nature of the award also serves as a baseline mitigation, as the contractor is incentivized to perform well to secure future work.
How effective has Valiant Government Services LLC been in delivering facilities support services in previous federal engagements?
Assessing the effectiveness of Valiant Government Services LLC requires a review of their past performance records, including Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data, if available. Generally, contractors that consistently win follow-on or similar contracts demonstrate a satisfactory level of performance. For this specific contract, the Department of the Army's selection of Valiant implies a positive assessment of their past capabilities or proposed approach. However, without direct access to detailed performance evaluations, it's difficult to definitively quantify their effectiveness beyond the fact that they were chosen in a competitive process.
What are the historical spending patterns for facilities operations and maintenance services within the Department of the Army, and how does this contract fit?
The Department of the Army, like other large military branches, consistently allocates significant portions of its budget to facilities operations and maintenance (O&M) to ensure the readiness and functionality of its vast infrastructure. Historical spending patterns show a continuous need for these services across numerous installations. This $21.8 million contract for facilities O&M in Ohio fits within the broader pattern of the Army outsourcing such services to leverage specialized expertise and manage costs effectively. It represents one component of a larger, ongoing investment in maintaining its physical assets, reflecting a strategic approach to infrastructure management.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W912DY12R0025
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Valiant Integrated Services LLC
Address: 101 WALTON WAY, HOPKINSVILLE, KY, 42240
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,821,073
Exercised Options: $21,821,073
Current Obligation: $21,821,073
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912DY15D0029
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-03-07
Current End Date: 2020-02-29
Potential End Date: 2020-02-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-07-03
More Contracts from Valiant Government Services LLC
- Force Projection Mission Area Labor - Bridge Task Order for Cjtf-Oir — $158.8M (Department of Defense)
- Mrmc O&M — $78.6M (Department of Defense)
- Interpretation and Translation Services for the Office of Security Cooperation-Iraq — $53.4M (Department of Defense)
- O&M With Repair and Minor Construction AT Mrdc, Various Locations — $49.2M (Department of Defense)
- Force Projection Labor - Bridge — $48.7M (Department of Defense)
View all Valiant Government Services LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)